Peer-to-peer networks are the strongest force of action

Peer-to-peer networks are the strongest force of action

Peer-to-peer work, transversal, spontaneous or not, collaboration,?peer-to-peer influence, peer-to-peer activities of Viral Change? champions or activists, all of this is the WMD of change and transformation in organizations. I mean Weapons of Mass Diffusion.

Traditional management was established to work top down and through formal structures, such as teams and committees. More and more, the neat and innovative work is taking place outside the formal, hierarchical structures, in the informal networks of the organization.

Forming and nurturing relationships outside the formal structures is a new key competence for mangers and leaders, and for that matter, all employees. It’s not new, but the emphasis and the weight is.

But, over the last few years, we have come a long way from seeing this intuitively and as an anecdote, to making it part of the leadership of the organization. It’s of course at the core of what is called ‘distributed leadership’. And it’s an engine far more powerful than the hierarchical one when it comes to shaping cultures, diffusing unwritten rules, copying and spreading behaviours, creating new norms, sharing and establishing new ideas.

Understanding and nurturing informal relationships has become an essential part of organizational leadership.

In the formal organization, you would not survive if you did not know the teams you have, their composition, their leaders, their goals etc. If you don’t have an equivalent for the informal organization (influencers, hyper-connected people, activists, mavericks, positive deviants, advocates, ‘who influences whom’ outside hierarchies– these are not the same, by the way), then you are missing at least three quarters of the game.

There are of course ways of identifying these informal, peer-to-peer networks and integrating them into the life of the organization. However, the formal organization likes swallowing anything. It’s a macro-phagocyte that will tend to corporatize anything that moves. And this is a life sentence for the peer-to-peer networks which detest the?teamocracy?of the formal system.

__________________________________________________________________________

If you feel that you are a bit behind in all these, or that it is all very well conceptually, but not sure what to do about it, well, the world is in front of you.

Start by reading about SNA (Social Network Analysis) or watching our webinar recording on the topic and explore possibilities. Through our?Viral Change? programmes, we at The Chalfont Project work with a particular peer-to-peer network of highly connected people, using 3CXcan.?To learn more about how we can help you in understanding and managing your informal social networks, contact us now.

Thomas M Heneker

I can help senior teams launch new business, drive efficiencies and develop operations. I have over 20 years' experience of business analysis, strategic development and cross-functional team leadership.

2 年

Leandro. Thank you for the great article. I've been very interested in distributed leadership & hierarchies for a while so this really piqued my interest.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dr Leandro Herrero的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了