Pederasty in ancient Greece: a view of a now forbidden institution
Wilfred Alex
Author of the book "... In the Last Days of America's Hegemony" see amazon.com/author/wilfredruhega
By Catherine S. Donnay
(from her Master's dissertation shared in the link below, see Pg. 12)
The Social Upheavals of Pederasty
Adapting the Mythological Tradition to Emerging Pederastic Norms
With the emergence of the intuition of pederasty in classical Athens, myths which originally had no homosexual erotic elements were changed to include these types of relationships, especially that of pederasty. Although myths recorded before 600 BCE portrayed Greek gods and heroes as heterosexually promiscuous, after that time pederastic episodes were introduced into the established mythology. As it did not exist before, these pederastic scenes became newly created literature. Again, we will examine the evidence of vase painting for this transition below. It is the lyric poets who first present us with these new mythological episodes. While neither challenging the heterosexuality of the Olympians, nor restructuring the basic society of Olympus these poets assigned at least one eromenos to every important god as well as many legendary figures. It is noteworthy that the only male deity not subjected to a pederastic episode was Ares, the god of war. Almost two centuries later, the Greek comic poets, would use the introduction of the immortals’ eromenoi as a satirical routine on stage.
In these new stories, the eromenoi of the gods were heroes, either half or fully mortal. These heroic eromenoi would in turn, upon reaching adulthood, become erastes themselves. They did not invent pederastic myths about the gods to excuse a human custom that they found immoral, but rather they considered pederasty an improvement over an earlier, and what they considered more primitive, system. Immortal approval of pederastic couples provided mythological legitimization for this growing custom. Among the numerous examples of the changing of mythology to include pederastic relations, this paper will provide only two, that of Zeus and Ganymede, and that of Achilles and Patroclus.
Zeus and Ganymede
Zeus, as most school children know, was the king of the gods of the Greek pantheon. Ganymede was a young half divine Trojan boy, son of a great hero and of the daughter of the river Scamander. Homer described the relationship between Zeus and Ganymede in the following way: …
领英推荐
Homer does not depict in anyway, or even infer, a sexual relationship between Ganymede and Zeus.
However lyric poetry of the sixth century BCE presents a vastly different picture. For at least one poet depicts Zeus and Ganymede as the perfect model of a pederastic relationship. Indeed, the example of the king of gods is used as a justification for pederasty on earth:
Achilles and Patroclus
A similar situation occurs with Achilles’ relationship with Patroclus. In the Illiad, Homer depicts this pair as very close, but not physically intimate:
Patroclus-the man I loved beyond all other comrades, loved as my own life-I’ve lost him… My spirit rebels-I’ve lost the will to live… Let me die at once… since it was not my fate to save my dearest comrade from his death.
Although Homer is specific in describing the relationship between Achilles and Patroclus as one of love, Homer is also specific in indicating that the sexual partner of Achilles is Bryseis, his slave woman. However, by the time of Plato, it is generically accepted that Patroclus and Achilles: …
Read more here:
NFL, American Gladiator (Sabre), Spiritual Counselor - Motivational Speaker, CEO Forever Noble Foundation Inc.
1 年And the Greeks were into polytheism (multiple gods). They changed the Name of the MasiYAH from YAHshua to jesus, which means earth pig. HalleluYAH for Truth
Retired Family Medicine Practitioner, was self employed.
1 年Or was it just the paedophiles in eons past who took advantage of the choices of others to their own ends? Indeed an exploitation of power by the more powerful classes, and those within such groups who lead the moves - but not recognising that not all humans have feelings of attraction only for the opposite sex was surely a ploy to legitimise their own proclivities?