Peak TV Has Not Peaked
Brad Schlachter
Fractional CMO | Growth Marketing Executive | Disney, Microsoft, MLB, and Scrappy Startup Alum |
Three years ago, FX Networks CEO John Landgraf coined the term “Peak TV” to describe how the explosion of scripted original shows across online services, broadcast, and cable TV was overwhelming consumers with too much choice. With a record 495 original scripted shows produced in 2018 — largely driven by a 37% increase from streaming services — many industry insiders are warning that the pace of growth is unsustainable; that too much content is being made relative to audience needs; and that consumer choice has reached its econometric limits.
But TDG’s analysis in January 2018 forecasted that this rapid proliferation would continue and highlighted the growing importance of original content in its Big-3 SVOD & The Original Content Arms Race report. In fact, we projected that content spending by Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon would increase dramatically over the next five years and that the amount invested in originals would triple to $10 billion annually by 2022.
What explains these contrasting views?
Peak TV May Be On The Horizon, But New Peaks Are Ahead of Us
TDG expects the pace of original productions to continue, as streaming services continue to shift their focus from licensed content to developing more original programming. An expanded array of high-quality originals is seen as the best way to differentiate themselves from the competition, gain new subscribers, and reduce churn.
And this strategy is paying off, especially for Netflix, which continues to post strong subscriber and revenue growth. TDG’s original research from early 2018 showed that roughly 50% of Netflix users now cite original programming as “very important” or “absolutely critical” in their decision to sign up for the service, with more than 60% stating the same for their continued use.
Subscription streaming services and premium cable networks also have proven that high profile original programming such as Game of Thrones, The Handmaids Tale, and Stranger Things can lift a brand and earn the respect of Hollywood. In other words, it is highly unlikely that these networks will pull back on original content spending any time soon, especially with new players joining the originals arms race (e.g., YouTube and Apple) and intensifying competition.
Can We Have Too Much Choice?
The benefits of high-quality originals have content providers investing in new productions at an annual cost that is unsustainable over the long term. This much is certain, though it has yet to limit production schedules or the pace of investment.
But is the vast array of entertainment options overly intimidating for today’s quantum consumer?
The explosion in content makes it more challenging for customers to find what to watch, especially when shows are fragmented between linear TV and a growing array of streaming apps. However, new technologies will ultimately make massive content catalogs a positive for customers and not a burden. The emergence of voice-activated search on streaming devices and AI-driven content personalization are already helping viewers navigate and discover the right content at the right time.
Netflix’s Ted Sarandos goes a step further, countering ‘the paradox of choice.’ He recently told Variety that “the notion of Peak TV is a completely backwards idea, which is that somehow you can have too much of things.” He noted that Netflix will continue to make a large volume of programming, since individuals’ tastes are diverse and “the idea that there’s too much out there is silly, and it’s a very kind of analogue idea of how to make programming choices.”
Conclusion
The escalation of original programming will continue over the next few years, as high-profile streaming services from Disney and AT&T’s WarnerMedia are set to launch late in 2019. As more major studios jump into the direct-to-consumer streaming space, they will continue to pull back the licensing rights to their owned IP and force further investment in originals.
All TV services and networks are battling for consumer attention, and with the competition intensifying, high-profile original shows are of paramount importance. Over the long term, the mounting production costs will cause the pace of growth to slow, but we still have a way to go before we hit that peak.
Brad Schlachter is a Senior Advisor for TDG and a highly accomplished digital marketer and advisor for leading entertainment and technology focused organizations. Prior to TDG, Brad served as the marketing lead for Motor Trend OnDemand, the premier OTT destination for gearheads, and was the VP of marketing at Hallmark Labs for the launch of its family-friendly SVOD service. He currently lives in Los Angeles.
So Landgraf actually stole the "peak TV" thing from me after I interviewed him in 2014 about the emerging glut of TV shows ... which FX had been first to track. I want medal, damn it!
Chief Marketing Officer @ NPR | Marketing Communications, New Media
6 年Great article.? Paradox of choice theory says increased perceived assortment size leads to more fear of missing out anxiety.? But as you say, AI content personalization reduces the perceived assortment size to less stressful levels - e.g. even as Netflix's library grows, you still see the same number of recommendations on your home screen.? So for viewers, more content doesn't mean more choices, just better recommendations.??
Fractional CMO | Growth Marketing Executive | Disney, Microsoft, MLB, and Scrappy Startup Alum |
6 年Could not agree more!
President at Media Dynamics Inc.
6 年With so many channels out there and new sources popping up almost weekly, it's a given that there will be more and more "scripted" shows. Moreover, it's nonsensical to portray this as a problem for the viewer. Actually, it's a benefit. The danger, from a programmer's viewpoint, is creating too many "me too" shows---like supposedly "edgy" dramas---- which glut the available menus of fans of the better shows of this type and eventually pull down the entire genre---- which then requires a "rest" for five or six years. So, it's not a viewer problem---it's a content supplier's problem.