Payment Processing vs. Aggregation vs. PayFac

Let's start to make some order in this complex and dynamic payment service providers modals based on the calls we are getting.

Payment Processing vs. Aggregation vs. PayFac: Understanding the Best Model for Your Business

Introduction

As businesses expand into the digital economy, selecting the right payment infrastructure becomes a crucial decision. The choice between payment processors, aggregators, and PayFac (Payment Facilitators) impacts a company's operational efficiency, compliance burden, and revenue potential.

This article explores the three primary models, their advantages, challenges, and ideal use cases to help businesses determine the best payment solution for their needs. We will also provide real-world examples and in-depth insights to help merchants, SaaS businesses, and enterprise-level companies make informed decisions.

Understanding the Three Payment Models

1. Payment Processing

A payment processor acts as the intermediary between merchants, acquiring banks, and card networks (e.g., Visa, Mastercard, American Express). This model provides businesses with a dedicated Merchant Identification Number (MID) and direct integration with an acquiring bank.

How It Works:

1. A customer initiates a transaction on a merchant’s website or POS system.
2. The transaction details are sent to the payment processor.
3. The processor routes the request to the acquiring bank and card networks for authorization.
4. Upon approval, funds are settled in the merchant’s account.

Pros of Payment Processing:

• Lower Transaction Costs: Direct agreements with acquiring banks offer better rates compared to aggregators.
• More Control: Merchants handle their own fraud prevention, risk management, and settlement cycles.
• Customization & Flexibility: Ability to optimize payment flows, dispute resolution, and fraud prevention tools.
• Better Data Insights: Direct access to transaction data helps merchants optimize operations and fraud prevention.

Cons of Payment Processing:

• Complex Setup: Requires underwriting, compliance checks, and technical integration.
• Higher Compliance Burden: Merchants must adhere to PCI DSS, KYC, and fraud monitoring requirements.
• Risk Exposure: Full liability for chargebacks, fraud, and compliance violations.

Example: A large eCommerce retailer processing $50M annually partners with Adyen as a payment processor to reduce fees, manage disputes efficiently, and optimize cross-border payments.

2. Payment Aggregation

A payment aggregator streamlines payment acceptance by allowing multiple businesses to process transactions under a shared Merchant ID. This model is commonly used by platforms like Stripe, PayPal, and Square.

How It Works:

1. Merchants sign up with an aggregator instead of obtaining their own MID.
2. The aggregator processes transactions on behalf of sub-merchants.
3. Payments are collected under the aggregator’s merchant account and then distributed to individual businesses.

Pros of Payment Aggregation:

• Faster Onboarding: Businesses can start accepting payments within minutes.
• Less Compliance Hassle: The aggregator handles fraud monitoring, chargebacks, and PCI compliance.
• Ideal for Small Businesses & Startups: Lower upfront costs make it accessible for businesses that want a quick setup.
• Built-in Security & Compliance: The aggregator assumes most compliance responsibilities.

Cons of Payment Aggregation:

• Higher Fees: Aggregators charge higher processing rates compared to direct processors.
• Limited Control: Businesses must adhere to the aggregator’s risk and compliance policies.
• Payout Delays: Settlements often take longer, as funds are disbursed based on the aggregator’s policies.

Example: A small SaaS startup selling subscriptions opts for Stripe for its ease of setup, allowing them to focus on product growth rather than payment compliance.

3. Payment Facilitation (PayFac)

A Payment Facilitator (PayFac) acts as an intermediary, similar to an aggregator, but with more control and the ability to onboard sub-merchants directly. This model is popular among companies like Shopify Payments and Toast.

How It Works:

1. A business becomes a PayFac and registers with an acquiring bank.
2. The PayFac onboards sub-merchants, managing KYC, underwriting, and compliance.
3. Transactions are processed under the PayFac’s infrastructure, allowing full control over payments and settlements.

Pros of PayFac:

• Revenue Generation: Businesses can charge transaction fees, creating a new revenue stream.
• Control Over Merchant Experience: Customizable onboarding, pricing, and risk management.
• Branding & Customer Retention: Merchants remain within the PayFac’s ecosystem, increasing stickiness.
• Scalability for Marketplaces & Platforms: Ideal for businesses with multiple sub-merchants.

Cons of PayFac:

• Regulatory Compliance: Requires adherence to strict financial regulations, including PCI DSS and KYC.
• Complex Setup & Costly Infrastructure: Significant investment is needed for underwriting, fraud prevention, and risk monitoring.
• Ongoing Risk Management: The PayFac is responsible for monitoring fraud and chargeback ratios.

Example: A SaaS platform for freelancers becomes a PayFac to streamline payouts and revenue sharing among service providers, reducing Stripe fees and improving control over merchant onboarding.

Which Model is Right for Your Business?

Choosing the right payment model depends on various factors, including business size, growth trajectory, and risk appetite.

Use a Payment Processor If:

? Your business processes high transaction volumes and wants to optimize processing costs. ? You have the resources to handle compliance, fraud monitoring, and chargebacks in-house. ? You want full control over the payment experience.

Use a Payment Aggregator If:

? You need a quick and easy setup with minimal compliance overhead. ? Your business is in early-stage growth and not yet handling large transaction volumes. ? You are comfortable with higher processing fees in exchange for convenience.

Use a PayFac Model If:

? You operate a SaaS platform, marketplace, or vertical solution requiring direct merchant onboarding. ? You want to control risk and fraud while offering a streamlined merchant experience. ? You are willing to invest in compliance and operational infrastructure to maximize long-term revenue.

Final Thoughts

Selecting the right payment model is critical for scaling a business efficiently. Many startups begin with payment aggregators for ease of onboarding, transition to PayFac for better margins and control, and eventually migrate to direct processors for full ownership of payments.

As digital payments evolve, businesses must continuously assess their payment strategy to balance convenience, cost-effectiveness, and control.

What’s Your Payment Strategy?

Which payment model aligns best with your business goals? Let’s discuss in the comments!

www.edatapay.com +1-561-395-9554