Paying the Price for Hands Free

Paying the Price for Hands Free

Undefined, Unregulated Hands-Free Driving Means Unsafe Roads

Hands-free driving

By Junko Yoshida

Calling their vehicles “Level 2” gives automakers a free pass to blame drivers for crashes since Level 2, by definition, means human drivers are responsible for all driving -- with or without hands. A recent crash raises concerns that BMW might be practicing unsafe testing of a iX test vehicle, using Level 2 designation as a security blanket.

Read more...

************************************

Proposed 'Reverse CFIUS' Would Curb China Investments

Reverse CFIUS

By George Leopold

If enacted, outbound investments by U.S. companies could be scrutinized by a proposed interagency review panel.

Read more...

*****************************************

Startups Seek to Crash the Metaverse Party

AR glasses

By Peter Clarke

Entrepreneurs are focusing on smart eyeglasses, audio, touch and the wireless connections needed to create an alternate reality.

Read more...

****************************************

Look, Kids! No Hands!

hands free

By David Benjamin

What the hands-free driving ads miss is the primordial urge to grab the steering wheel.

Read more...

*****************************************

Metaverse, Omniverse--How Versed Can We Get?

metaverse

By Jon Peddie

The promise of Infinite communications in 3D worlds.

Read more...

********************************************

What Caught Our Eye This Week

California Bill Targets TeslaOne might say it’s about time to tie Tesla’s hands.Legislation targeting Tesla’s claim of “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) passed California’s state legislature this week. The bill now heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom for his signature.

Given that Tesla’s FSD clearly doesn’t make its vehicles self-driving, the bill calls for the ban on false advertising. It also sets new requirements for automakers to clearly explain?the capabilities and limits of partial-automation technology?when a new car is delivered and when software is updated.

Despite the existing rules within the department banning ads for “self-driving” cars when they are not, California’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has never enforced the ban.“Impatient with the DMV, the state Legislature is stepping in, going over the DMV's head and making its false advertising regulation a state law,” the?LA Times?reported.

The new bill doesn't specifically address the safety of FSD technology, instead limiting its scope to the way it's portrayed in advertising. The question legislators should be asking is: Should testing of the beta version of Tesla’s FSD be allowed on public roads by what one industry analyst calls Tesla’s “FSD testing vigilantes”?

Critics notes that politicians and regulators are ill-equipped to question the safety of increasingly software-driven vehicles featuring partial autonomy.

Los Angeles Times:?Bill targeting Tesla’s ‘self-driving’ claims passes California Legislature


Race Begins for CHIPS Act FundingCommerce Secretary Gina Riamondo is urging states and public universities to compete for federal subsidies aimed at reviving U.S. semiconductor manufacturing and technology supply chains.

“This is a race,” Riamondo said during an event at Arizona State University. “It’ll be competitive. It’ll be transparent and I hope every state competes.”

The Commerce Department launched its?CHIPS.gov website?last week to jumpstart the competition for federal funding. Among the implementation priorities listed are meeting economic and national security needs along with reestablishing U.S. leadership in semiconductor design and manufacturing.

Critics of the CHIPS and Science Act argued against providing subsidies to the booming semiconductor industry, which prospered in part from offshoring manufacturing. Hence, the $52.7 billion in CHIPS Act funding includes “guardrails” designed to ensure funds are invested in U.S. manufacturing and workforce training.

According to the Commerce website, “The CHIPS program will include rigorous review of applications along with robust compliance and accountability requirements to ensure taxpayer funds are protected and spent wisely, and are not used for dividends, stock buybacks, or windfall profits.”

Bloomberg:?Riamondo Says States Must Compete for New Chips Investment, Jobs

*******************************************

If you like stories like these,?please subscribe to the Ojo-Yoshida Report.You will receive:

要查看或添加评论,请登录

The Ojo-Yoshida Report的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了