The Path to Reconciliation

The Path to Reconciliation

My friend Asana gave me the script of a short play from when she was involved in the UN’s Reconciliation of the Dagomba and Konkomba tribes in Yendi. I’m glad I saved it, because our world needs reconciliation now, more than ever. The four players in Reconciliation are Mercy, Truth, Justice, and Peace.

Who does Peace fear most? Not uncompromising Truth, but Mercy! The reason is that Mercy is often too quick to insist that everyone forgive and move on, without allowing Truth to tell her story. When Truth is sidelined, Justice is circumvented as well. This attempt at a quick fix to the problem can bring temporary Peace, but that Peace is fragile, because it is not founded upon Reconciliation. Reconciliation comes only from both parties acknowledging what they did and what the other party did and agreeing to relationship anyway, which sometimes requires that Justice step in as well.

People are often told to forgive quickly and to move along – as if that will bring Peace. This can work for minor troubles, but for serious wrongs, it is not enough. Mercy, without Truth and Justice, provides an empty promise of Peace. Without Truth and Justice, the feelings of hurt and injustice are not resolved, and bitterness and resentment, rather than lasting Peace and Reconciliation, are fostered. When Mercy-filled conflict avoiders create an atmosphere in which discussing Truth verbally is taboo, violent confrontations can be the result, because eventually pent up feelings of injustice explode. Of course, ruminating over Truth and demanding absolute Justice, silencing Mercy, blocks Peace as well. Truth, Mercy, Justice, and Peace must act together to bring Reconciliation.

The script did not mention that the ideas in it come from the Bible, but clearly they do. Psalm 85 discusses God reconciling himself to his disobedient children, the nation of Israel, who have committed unspeakable sins against him. Verse 10 says, “Mercy and truth have met each other: justice and peace have kissed.”

In modern Christianity, people often disagree over the idea of “cheap grace.” One side says that of course, grace should be given freely, because grace from God is free. The other side urges that grace not be trivialized. Christ spoke of generous forgiveness (Luke 17:3-4, Matt 18:22) but immediately prior to that He also spoke of truth and reconciliation. We are to go to our brother who has wronged us, urgently (Matt 5:23-4), first alone (Matt 18:15) and if that is unsuccessful, with others (Matt 18:16-17). This is not a depiction of a quick mental assent to “forgive and forget” but rather, doing the WORK of talking it out – getting to the Truth – admitting guilt (and if appropriate, repenting) so that Justice and Mercy can be balanced and true Peace – Reconciliation – can be achieved. Resentment can eat away at our souls. Lev 19:17 warns, “Don’t secretly hate your neighbor. If you have something against him, get it out into the open; otherwise you are an accomplice in his guilt.” Forgiveness is a personal, private act (Mark 11:25); we can forgive and leave Justice to God. However, it is only when we are reconciled that our relationship is restored (Col 1:20). And really, that is what the Gospel is all about: reconciling each person to God (II Cor 5:18-20).  


Linda L L Benskin

Independent Researcher/Educator for VHWs AND Clinical Research, Education, & Charity Liaison for Ferris Mfg. Corp

4 年

My friend Rick Hodges had this to add to this topic. Relationships and Conflicts JOSHUA 22 It could be said that the entire Bible is a book of conflict. Most every book contains conflict. The shortest book of the Bible is all about conflict (Philemon). Because the Bible is a book about relationships, it is necessarily a book of conflicts. There are conflicts between individuals, families, tribes, groups, and nations. Even thought we can now have peace with God through the sacrifice of Christ, as long as we live in a world where sin exists, we will find peace with others one of our most challenging endeavors. The class today centers around an episode of conflict among God’s people centuries prior to the birth of Christianity. This passage in Joshua is a reminder that harmony is as fragile as individuals are flawed. The story reveals how conflicts may begin and how they may be resolved. In today’s story we have the 12 tribes of Israel who have entered the promised land. Two and a half of the tribes took the land Moses had given them east of the Jordan River. The remaining tribes stayed on the west side. This made a majority settlement and a minority settlement. Can you feel any conflicts coming? Shiloh, the location of the tabernacle, was on the west side. That was where real worship was to take place. Can you feel some trouble brewing? The eastern tribes erected an altar to serve as a witness to affirm that although they were on the other side of the river, far from Shiloh, they loved God too. When the western tribes heard of it, they began organizing to go to war against the eastern tribes. TAKEAWAYS FOR TODAY 1. Faulty information almost always leads to flawed interpretations that provoke wrong conclusions with potentially disastrous results. Fortunately in this story, calmer heads and wiser thinkers prevailed and disaster was averted though reasonable conflict resolution. 2. Resolution is not possible without communication. A delegation of the western tribes headed by Phineas the priest paid a visit to the east side altar builders. Instead of just attacking the supposed idol worshippers with a punishing army, they sent a team of investigators and negotiators. Instead of sending warriors armed with weapons, they sent diplomats bearing questions. 3. Good conflict resolution almost always begins with questions rather than accusations. The delegation began with a series of questions, although presented in the way a prosecuting attorney asks questions when he or she is certain of the answer. Nevertheless, the leading questions at least provided the stunned eastern tribes with a chance to answer and make their intentions clear. 4. Reconciliation is not possible without cooperation. Even though the delegation was fairly certain that they had correctly perceived the grievous offense, they proposed a way of repentance and made a generous offer to share their own land (v 19). This is a great example of reconciliation being tried through cooperation. Additional evidence of cooperation is seen in that both sides were fairly respectful in their communication. Achieving reconciliation requires the mutual cooperation of respectful communication. It takes two to achieve harmony; it only takes one to sabotage it. 5. Unity is not the absence of conflict but the result of resolved conflict. Unity must incorporate and negotiate the differences we all bring to any relationship whether personal or in any group. And we all bring differences. Romans 12:18 – “If it is possible as far as it depends on you, live peacefully with all men

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Linda L L Benskin的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了