The Path to Intermodality

Welcome to the latest edition of Urban Tales, our newsletter focused on exploring the dynamic world of urban development. In this issue, we highlight insightful discussions between the Mayor and Pepet on improving intermodality.

?

Chapter #50: The Path to Intermodality

The soft hum of city life filled the office as the Mayor and Pepet, his devoted assistant, sat down to tackle their latest challenge. Carpolis was at a crossroads. As the Mayor leaned over the maps of the city, it was clear he was ready to embrace change, but he needed a direction—a path to a greener, more accessible city.

“Pepet, it’s time for Carpolis to rethink its transportation. We need something that keeps cars from dominating the roads but allows people to move freely and conveniently,” the Mayor began, his brow furrowing with determination.

Pepet, his eyes lighting up, had come prepared. “Mayor, we’re not just talking about removing cars; we’re talking about creating an intermodal transport system that combines different forms of transit. Intermodality isn’t just a buzzword. It’s essential for sustainable mobility,” he explained, referencing studies he’d collected on cities that had transformed their transportation systems by integrating various modes of transport.

“In practical terms, what does intermodality mean for Carpolis?” the Mayor asked, leaning forward.

“Think of it this way,” Pepet responded, pointing to different areas on the map. “Intermodality is like weaving a network of routes that combine buses, trains, bikes, and walkways. For instance, we could have intermodal stations that serve as central hubs where travelers can seamlessly transfer from one mode to another, whether it’s from a bus to a bike or a train to a pedestrian pathway.”

The Mayor considered this vision thoughtfully. “So, we’re creating new stations or hubs?”

“Exactly,” Pepet continued. “These intermodal stations will become the pivots of the city’s mobility network. They need to be organized, accessible, and reliable, with minimal waiting times. High levels of service and affordable, integrated tickets will attract users from all demographics. We’re talking about a city where everyone, regardless of age or income, can get around without relying on a private car.”

“Accessibility for all,” the Mayor murmured, “that’s key. And what about specific neighborhoods?”

Pepet nodded, turning to another section of the map. “Different neighborhoods will have different combinations of transport modes. For example, urban neighborhoods could prioritize bicycle and public transport combinations, while decentralized areas might blend car access with public transit. Well-connected areas might rely on a mix of buses, trams, or trains, depending on the density.”

The Mayor’s eyes lit up. “It sounds wonderful, but we’ll have to make it easy for people. You know, people don’t like switching between modes if it feels like a hassle.”

“True,” Pepet agreed. “That’s why time efficiency is crucial. We’ll make transfers comfortable and minimize wait times by integrating new technology. Real-time travel information will give passengers accurate estimates of arrival and departure, reducing frustration. We want moving from a bus to a train to feel seamless, not like an obstacle.”

“So, we’re talking about apps and digital boards?” the Mayor asked, excitedly imagining how this might look.

“Yes, exactly. Apps, digital boards, and even simple signs at every transfer point. With new information and communication technology, people will plan and adjust their routes in real-time. For instance, a delay in one mode will instantly offer alternatives,” Pepet explained, painting a vivid picture of Carpolis’ future transport network.

“And you mentioned ticketing?” the Mayor inquired.

“One ticket,” Pepet said with a grin. “One ticket to travel anywhere within the city, valid on all forms of transport. Integrated tariff systems are standard in large cities implementing intermodality, allowing residents and tourists alike to access the entire network with ease.”

The Mayor nodded, inspired. “But this kind of project isn’t just for city commuting, right?”

“Correct,” Pepet replied, outlining three levels of connectivity for Carpolis: City, Regional, and Transnational. “City connectivity will enhance local transit hubs and integrate all urban transport options. Regional connectivity will extend beyond Carpolis, improving rail and bus links between Carpolis and nearby cities. And for transnational connectivity, we’re talking fast rail and perhaps maritime links for major destinations across borders. A network like this makes public transport competitive with private cars, even for longer journeys.”

“Pepet, this sounds like a complete rethinking of our city’s mobility,” the Mayor said, impressed. “But it’s going to be a challenge.”

“It will,” Pepet admitted. “But with a phased approach, starting with city-level hubs and gradually expanding, we can make it happen. The benefits to the environment and to our citizens’ quality of life will be immeasurable.”

The Mayor took a deep breath, feeling a new sense of direction. “Let’s start small and build from there. It’s time for Carpolis to embrace the future—one intermodal connection at a time.”

With a handshake and a shared vision, the Mayor and Pepet prepared to embark on the journey of transforming Carpolis into a model city for sustainable, integrated urban mobility. And all this was happening in Carpolis, a city that wanted to change its name.

References

Pazzini, M., Lantieri, C., Vignali, V., Simone, A., Dondi, G., Luppino, G., & Grasso, D. (2022). Comparison between different territorial policies to support intermodality of public transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 60, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.010

?