Partner or Die: How to Succeed Even After the Digital Health Hype Quiets Down

Partner or Die: How to Succeed Even After the Digital Health Hype Quiets Down

This article, co-authored with Rob Coppedge, CEO of Echo Health Ventures, was originally published as a two-part series at Xconomy.com in early December.

More than 6,500 people descended on HLTH in Las Vegas last month to “solve the most pressing problems facing health care today”. Walking the halls, we couldn’t shake a nagging question: Who are all these people? Contrary to some of our own predictions, digital health is not dead yet. The hype cycle is still going strong. So strong in fact that attendees were treated to Mark Cuban cursing big pharma, an ever-present DJ, and several overly earnest hackathons. Importantly, we counted no fewer than 1,000 tweets and selfies posted from the private Flo Rida concert. 

Against this backdrop reminiscent of Corporate Burning Man, we participated in a panel discussion focused on what it takes for health care innovators and incumbents to cut through the noise and truly be successful in today’s market, and we are pleased that this conversation has continued in the weeks following the conference. We want to share several key points that aim to help both startups and legacy companies build differentiated and sustainable business models (even after the digital health hype quiets down).

Digital Health Survivors

While venture capital continues to flow freely and every Rock Health report is more positive than the last, our conversations in Vegas confirmed what we already sensed – the digital health sector continues to divide between winners and losers.

Today’s successful companies understand the importance of enterprise relationships and channel access. They have hired health care experts, partnered effectively, and have even co-developed their models alongside legacy players. Many raised venture capital from strategic corporate investors who have helped them refine their product, accelerate channel access, and get past the risk of “death by pilot”. These “Digital Health Survivors” have taken a road that is unfortunately less traveled.

The other road is cluttered with well-intentioned point solutions still looking for “product-market fit” and “sales traction”. These companies are facing numerous challenges – and raising capital is very difficult for them (or will soon be). Most have failed to craft meaningful channel partnerships or leverage scaled partners to find early, credible proof points. Surprisingly, many highly respected venture capital firms have invested in these companies; venture capitalists that do not have a reputation for overlooking product-market fit problems, sales traction hiccups, or lack of credible proof points in other industries. There is still time for some of these companies (and investors) to adjust direction and retool, however, it will require new thinking and new talent in many of their C-suites and board rooms.

Advantage: Innovative Incumbents

Despite being attacked on all sides from innovative start-ups, well-capitalized tech companies, big retail brands, and government regulators, traditional health care services companies simply don’t seem disrupted yet. In fact, driven by consolidation and strong financial performance, many are healthier and appear more confident than ever. And some of the more successful ones even seem downright innovative themselves – having learned from innovators to build, buy and partner their way to new capabilities.

Upon closer inspection, these “Innovative Incumbents” have a few things in common. First, many of them are on a similar mission, in pursuit of the “triple aim” of improved affordability, outcomes and experience. They also have risk-tolerant, innovation-embracing boards and management teams, strong balance sheets, and the ability to attract top talent.

Most importantly, these Innovative Incumbents are differentiated by their commitment to becoming good partners with the “Digital Health Survivors.” They have realized that winning in the future means bringing together better solutions and consumer experiences than their competitors. We have seen them add new technology and nimble operating models to their existing business with a focus on bringing enhanced value propositions to market at scale. They have created teams and set aside budget to make these partnerships successful and many are creating technological, data, and operational APIs to drive efficiency in standing up partnerships with innovators.

The Path Forward

Between Echo and Blue Cross NC, we work deeply on both sides of these partnerships and have perspective that accelerate their development or shut them down. Our advice to start ups wanting to ensure their Digital Health Survival always includes:

  1. Don’t confuse marketing with sales: All of your Twitter followers, conference keynotes, and grand theories about disrupting our industry are great, but will only get you so far. Focus on proving your expertise, be specific about how you helped navigate challenging implementations, show us the money, and be clear about how you delivered actual value. Your tweets become far more interesting when they articulate something you’ve done instead what you want to do.
  2. Build a strong, high value investor syndicate, board and advisory team… and use them: While VC mega-rounds drive great early press releases, it is earnings, outcomes and a right-sized cap table that will drive your digital health returns. If you are lucky enough to be able to choose, make sure you pick quality allies, co-developers and distribution partners over even the “smartest” capital. We are seeing the lack of demonstrable proof points, solid outcomes studies and references stand in the way of accelerated sales across digital health. In the early stages of building your business those are priceless. As you scale, investors that can help open doors and drive growth play the same role. Prioritize true strategic value over the brand name on your fleece vest every time.
  3. Do your homework and understand the priorities of all of your partner’s stakeholders: When you come to pitch us on a strategic partnership, show that you actually know what we need. Who at the table will benefit from a strategic partnership with you? Who fears losing autonomy and influence as a result of your partnership? You need to sell a personalized strategy and use case for each and every potential stakeholder at the table. Entrepreneurs must understand the context for the "disruption" they plan to bring to market, which requires a keen understanding of the gory details of workflows, productions systems and financial flows that underpin the broken systems.
  4. Be honest about your competitors. You have them (and they’re also pitching us): In the rare times where there is literally no one else doing what you are doing, your primary competitor is human behavior. What are your customers doing now instead of using your product? Be prepared to share your detailed plan on how you will outplay, outwit, and outlast the competition.
  5. No matter what race you think you are running – prepare for a marathon, not a sprint: Realistic valuations and investor expectations remove barriers for downstream fundraising, strategic pivots, or exit options. You need investors and partners that not only understand this, but who can also help you learn faster – and support your agility in making these decisions earlier.
Of course, partnership is a two-way street. For legacy companies seeking to build their capabilities as an Innovative Incumbent, it requires a top down commitment to adaptation.

In particular:

  1. Get commitment from your board:  Strategic partnerships between Innovative Incumbents and Digital Health organizations have very high upside, as they can combine the incumbent’s track record and institutional capability with the digital health company’s expertise and energy to drive meaningful change. But those very same qualities can offer downside too. Bringing together the best of these two worlds starts with ensuring both organizations are in complete strategic alignment – both philosophically and financially. This is not just among leadership, but all the way up through the board as well.
  2. Strategy trumps investment: Value for the Innovative Incumbent is likely in the commercial arrangements (i.e. through lower cost of care or enhanced market opportunity). Be aware of this and ensure the relationships deliver. Taking an equity stake, and even potentially a board seat, with the partner should further align incentives but should NOT be a goal in and of itself (We joke regularly that there may be more near-term financial return for a health plan in mail room optimization than start-up investing – but the strategic value of the relationship with start-ups can be transformative.)
  3. Culture eats strategy for lunch. Incumbent health insurers are in the business of managing risk. You should get more comfortable with taking some. This might mean making decisions and moving faster than feels comfortable and rethinking your technical requirements to deal with more nascent companies and technologies. Remember you are entering into a partnership, which means compromises must be reached. Yes, your legal department is larger, but you don’t always need to bring a bazooka to a knife fight.
  4. Measure. Iterate. Move on: When it comes to partnerships, things will go wrong. Therefore, it’s critical to subject everything to exhaustive evaluation. This means testing hypotheses empirically, learning, and improving (and when necessary, standing down or starting over). Don’t give up, but also don’t fall into the sunk-cost fallacy. While some start-ups may push back at first, the smartest less mature companies realize they can benefit greatly from the structure and experience that working with incumbents can provide.
  5. Play the Long Game: It’s easy to get caught up in the issues of today, making decisions year-by-year or quarter-by-quarter. It’s also easy to judge the digital health start-up on what they can do today versus what you can do together over time. That kind of tactical thinking is where mistakes are made too often. Don’t make them. As the old saying goes, someone’s sitting in the shade today because someone else planted a tree a long time ago.

Partner or Die

Twitter went aflutter with excitement when CB Insights named the “Digital Health 150” (a list of the most promising startups) – which we are proud to say include several we have invested in and/or work with closely. Certainly these companies – stand out among their peers and have a better shot at growth and longer term success. However, there is a long road ahead for all of these companies and their digital health siblings.

When we look at this list and attempt to predict which are best positioned to be a true market leader in five years, we apply an additional filter: which companies have demonstrated the ability to attract, execute, and expand partnership with Innovative Incumbents. There is no better way for these innovators to efficiently access channel and achieve scale. There is likely not enough capital in Silicon Valley for the Digital Health 150 to get there any other way.

We believe strongly that if we are ever going to stop talking about impending disruption and instead get on with sharing the results of a system reorganized to enable patient and family affordability, access and experience, it will require true, scaled partnership between the Digital Health Survivors and the Innovative Incumbents. Both sides need to do their homework, rethink their approaches and approach these partnerships with the requisite humility that will allow each side to leverage its strengths (and not be anchored down by their limitations).

At a not too distant conference, we look forward to celebrating these true digital health success stories where finally, there will be something truly worth tweeting about. 

Andrea Marcos

Strategy | Customer Experience | Branding & Marketing

4 年

Yes to all of this

Nikhil Bhojwani

Managing Partner @ Recon Strategy | Healthcare Consulting | AI in Health | Visiting professor | Keynote speaker | Alum of Wharton, BCG, St. Stephen's College

4 年

This is a wonderfully written article that every digital health startup CEO should read. It is from the perspective of an "innovative incumbent" defined? in the article as those who are pursuing the triple-aim and have "risk-tolerant, innovation-embracing boards and management teams, strong balance sheets, and the ability to attract top talent". The challenge for many startup CEOs is that there are too few truly innovative incumbents and that it's not always easy to identify who exactly those are (beyond the most obvious ones such as the companies associated with the authors). Maybe someone will come up with a rating or list of innovative incumbents in healthcare (hint, hint).

William Bennett, MBA

Merging analysis of dollars and data to drive operations, relationships and spend for 5th largest health insurer in US

4 年

Great article Bryony Winn. Thank you for sharing. Your article provides some great insight on how to evaluate and approach strategic partnerships with digital health companies. Your evaluation criteria for digital health start up success make a lot of sense. I look forward to seeing future content.

Thank you, Bryony and Rob - this is one of the best summaries of the realities of digital health success that I’ve read. Couldn’t agree more with the need to focus on execution rather than marketing and the criticality of working in partnership with leading incumbents. Thanks for putting this together.

Bradford Shepherd

VP of Sales at Evive Health | Experienced Commercial Real Estate Investor

4 年

That's phenomenal insight. The next five years in this space will be very interesting.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Bryony Winn的更多文章

社区洞察