Participation vs Contribution

Live entertainment thrives on collaboration, but not all collaboration is created equal. I’ve recently been contemplating what the difference is between participation and contribution, which can often define the line between a good production and an exceptional one. We are all participators in the work we do--and we show up in different ways--but understanding how to make the shift from a participant to a contributor is crucial for us to lead effectively.

1. The Basics: What’s the Difference?

Participation: Simply showing up, following instructions, and performing tasks without additional engagement. Essentially doing your job. For example, a follow-spot operator executes cues as called but doesn’t alert the team to potential sightline issues during rehearsals.

Contribution: Actively engaging in problem-solving and offering insights. That same operator might notice those sightline issues and proactively suggest adjustments.

Why It’s Important:

Participation ensures functionality; contribution drives improvement and innovation. To shift from participating to contributing, ask, “How can I add value beyond my job description?” There is a line, so be mindful of how you incorporate this and know your audience.

2. The Ripple Effect: Impact on Productions

Participation’s Impact: Keeps the production running as planned but leaves little room for growth or adaptation. For example, A team focusing solely on participation might stick to the cue sheet but struggle when unexpected challenges arise.

Contribution’s Impact: Strengthens adaptability and builds trust. For example, A team focused on contribution might suggest alternatives or adjust on the fly to maintain a seamless performance.

Why It’s Important:

Participation prevents failure, but contribution elevates success by anticipating needs and exceeding expectations. To make the shift, look for opportunities to improve the process, not just complete the task.

Read the full article on Half-Hour.