Part1: The Fabric Cover-up: Why Ultra-Fast Fashion Brands Want You to Ignore The Truth
Pic Credit: Project CECE

Part1: The Fabric Cover-up: Why Ultra-Fast Fashion Brands Want You to Ignore The Truth

In today's fast-paced fashion industry, ultra fast fashion brands have taken the market by storm, offering trendy and cheap styles to meet consumers' insatiable desire for the latest fashion fix. However, amidst the seemingly glamorous allure of these brands, there exists a dangerous trade-off that is too often overlooked – the detrimental impact of the synthetic fibers they utilize in their garments. Among them, polyester has emerged as a dominant player due to its low cost, durability, and versatility. However, beneath its seemingly beneficial qualities lies a host of environmental and health concerns that warrant our attention. This article delves into the harmful effects of polyester, shedding light on its production, impact on consumers, and difficulties in disposal.

Production Process and Environmental Impact:

  • The production of polyester fabric emits an estimated 1.5 trillion kilograms of greenhouse gases annually, contributing to approximately 3% of global CO2 emissions. (Source: Quantis)
  • The extraction and refining of non-renewable resources, like petroleum and natural gas, required for polyester production release significant amounts of carbon emissions, exacerbating climate change.
  • Polyester production consumes approximately 70 billion barrels of oil each year. (Source: World Wildlife Fund)
  • Textile dyeing and finishing processes release numerous toxic chemicals, with the fashion industry identified as the second-largest polluter of clean water globally. (Source: United Nations Environment Programme)Health Impact on Consumers:

  • Polyester's non-absorbent nature leads to moisture and heat being trapped against the skin, increasing the risk of discomfort, skin irritations, and the growth of bacteria and fungi.
  • Chemical treatments applied to polyester garments, such as flame retardants and stain repellents, can contain hazardous substances. For example, flame retardants may include polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), which have been linked to neurodevelopmental delays and hormone disruption. (Source: Green Science Policy Institute)
  • Formaldehyde resins, often used to give polyester garments wrinkle-resistant properties, can cause skin allergies, respiratory problems, and irritate the eyes and throat. (Source: American Academy of Dermatology)Disposal Challenges and Microplastic Pollution:

  • Polyester fabrics take several decades to hundreds of years to decompose fully in landfills, leading to a significant accumulation of textile waste. In terms of the after-effects of polyester decomposition, research has found that adding polyester microfibers to soil can affect litter decomposition rates. Polyester's presence in the soil can alter decomposition processes and impact microarthropod communities, potentially disrupting soil ecosystems.
  • The laundering of polyester clothing releases microplastics into water bodies. It is estimated that a single load of laundry can release up to 700,000 microplastic fibers. (Source: International Union for Conservation of Nature)
  • Microplastics generated by synthetic fibers, including polyester, Nylon, Acrylic etc are ingested by marine organisms, entering the food chain and potentially impacting human health.

The widespread use of polyester in the fashion industry has come at a significant environmental and health cost. Its production process contributes to climate change, depletes non-renewable resources, and pollutes air and water. Polyester garments treated with hazardous chemicals pose risks to human health, while the disposal of polyester clothing adds to the landfill crisis and contributes to microplastic pollution. By choosing sustainable and natural fiber alternatives, supporting secondhand clothing, and advocating for responsible fashion practices, we can collectively reduce the harm caused by synthetic fibers like polyester and work towards a more sustainable future. I will be covering the alternatives to synthetic fibers in my following posts.


Aharnish Arpit Tirkey

Corporate Sustainability |M.Sc. Sustainability & Climate Change Master's Candidate | TISS Mumbai |NIFT

11 个月

Thank you for this illuminating article Amar Nagaram The data on polyester's environmental impact is sobering, especially considering its prevalence in today's fashion industry. It would be useful to compare polyester with other fibres. For instance, while cotton is often cited as a more 'natural' alternative, it's worth noting that conventional cotton farming is water-intensive and frequently relies on pesticides. According to the World Wildlife Fund, cotton production is responsible for 24% of insecticides and 11% of pesticides globally, despite using only 3% of the world's arable land. Also, the CO2 emissions for producing one kilogram of cotton stand at around 5.3 kg, compared to polyester's 9.52 kg, per a study by the Journal of Cleaner Production. I am eager to learn how you approach this complex issue of sustainability while balancing it with the need for affordability and scalability in your business models? I am looking forward to your next article.

回复
Janne Einola

Chief Executive Officer at Pizza Hut Finland

1 年

The use of bio-based fibers and yarns in textile production has a number of environmental advantages, including resource conservation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and the potential for a more circular and sustainable textile economy. Biomass sources for bio-based fibers frequently sequester carbon dioxide during growth, assisting in the offset of emissions and mitigating the effects of climate change. By embracing these fibers, the textile industry can take a more sustainable and responsible approach to meeting the growing demand for textiles.

Disha Zaveri

International Education Specialist| Manager - North America Ex - University of Utah

1 年

Polyester – more like 'Polysustain' ! It's time to thread our way towards sustainable choices. Your post sheds light on a fabric-related epiphany, and it's clear that sustainability is the 'seamstress' of change in our fashion landscape. Kudos to you for weaving this important message into the fabric of our consciousness #SustainabilityStitches

回复
Narendra Makwana

Co-Founder at GreenStitch.io | Visiting Faculty, IIT Delhi | Empowering Fashion Brands with Data-Driven Sustainability

1 年

There is no single 'best' fiber; synthetics are not inherently 'absolutely worse.' Even textile exchange reports suggest the same. Natural fibers are not the 'absolute best' either. Each fiber has its own pros and cons. It's important to consider the complete environmental impact across all parameters, including water, greenhouse gas emissions, land degradation, toxicity, etc., to determine how to move forward. Labeling any single fiber as the worst is a form of greenwashing. What we need are more circular fibers.

Ranganathan Aravamudhan

3PL II SCM II SAAS-OMS/WMS II Digital Transformation II Cross Border Sales

1 年

Also. What about the entire dyeing process? It is a water consuming polluting process. Can on demand be a good alternative?

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了