Part III - 06-11-2024 Town of Miami Lakes Council Meeting Review
06-11-2024 Council Meeting Video Recording, click below
02:51:43 Item 13 C moved by Councilman Luis Collazo who reopens the order of Business to accommodate those waiting their turn...
Memo:
Recommendation:
Staff recommends to consider whether to revert the Senior Village Property to its prior Future land Use and Zoning designations. The property was rezoned to RM-36 in 2017 to accommodate the residential portion of the Senior Village Project which has failed to progress permitting.
Exhibit ‘A’ - from the Industrial and Office Category, to the medium-high density residential category. (Rey)
Ordinance No. 17-206
Section 13-307 of the Code, Town of Miami Lakes
Subsection 13-307 (b)
03-21-2017: Planning & Zoning Agenda
Ordinance 17-207 Senior Village
‘On 06-06-2017, after conducting a properly noticed quasi-judicial public hearing and considering the recommendations of the public, the Local Planning Agency, and the Administrative official, the Town Council finds it in the public interest to adopt the proposed amendment to the Official Zoning Map.
Background:
06-06-2017 Agenda / Video:
52:15: On the dial: Ordinances- 2nd Reading - Public Hearing:
Item 11A 56:46 on the dial, public is sworn in
57:06: Darby starts with Item 11 A
On June 6, 2017, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 17-206 redesignating a 9.445 +/-acre property located on the West side of Commerce Way and NW 146th Street from Industrial Office to Medium-High Residential (36 units to the Acre) in order to allow for the residential component of the development of the “Senior Village”. The Senior Village project encompassed a 62+ residential area, an ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility, and a Senior Center, all of which were intended to function as a complex.
At the same hearing, on June 6, 2017, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 17-207 rezoning the property from IU-C (Industrial Use Conditional) to RM-36 (Residential Multifamily 36 units to the Acre), As well as Resolution 17-1457 approving the siteplan, variances and conditional use for the ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility to be operated by Miami Jewish Health Systems, and Resolution 17-1455 approving the siteplan for the 220-unit residential area.
The conditions of approval of the ordinances stipulated that permits for the residential portion and the ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility portion of the complex should be obtained within two (2) years of approval, and that construction should occur within five (5) years. Failure to achieve permits or Certificate of Occupancy for both the residential and ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility would require the Town to consider re-designation to prior Industrial Office and IU-C designations.
@ 02:00:14 Graham Companies Luis Martinez presents the project plans...
On December 10, 2019, the Town Council adopted Resolution No. 19-1650 removing Miami Jewish Health Systems from the language of the approvals in order to allow for different operators for the ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility.
On November 29, 2021 the Town Council adopted Resolution No. 21-1797 approving the siteplan, variances and conditional use for the ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility to be operated by DOS of Hialeah. Since that time, DOS of Hialeah has ceased its pursuit of permits for this project.
Attachments: Resolution
Proposed Resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 24 - __________
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MIAMI LAKES, FLORIDA, CONSIDERING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND REZONING OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY WITH FOLIO NUMBER 32-2022-068-0010, LOCATED AT 14650 OAK LN, MIAMI LAKES, FLORIDA 33016, FROM MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, RM-36 TO INDUSTRIAL-OFFICE, IU-C; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF RECITALS; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2017, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 17-206 (attached), which allowed for an amendment to the Town of Miami Lakes ( the “Town”) Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to allow for the rezoning of a 9.445 +/-acre property located on the West side of Commerce Way and NW 146th Street, Miami Lakes, Florida (the "Property"), IU-C (Industrial Use Conditional) to RM-36 (Residential Multifamily 36 units to the Acre) in order to allow for the residential component of the development of the complex known as “The Senior Village.”
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2017, the Town Council adopted Ordinance No. 17-207 (attached) rezoning the Senior Village from an IU-C (Industrial Use Conditional) to a RM-36 (Residential Multifamily 36 units to the Acre); and
WHEREAS, conditions of approval of Ordinance No. 17-206 and 17-207 stipulated that permits for the residential portion and the ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility portion of the complex should be obtained within two (2) years of approval, and that construction should occur within five (5) years; and
WHEREAS, failure to achieve permits or Certificate of Occupancy for both the Residential and the ALF and Skilled Nursing Facility would require the Town to consider re-designation to prior Industrial Office and IU-C designations. WHEREAS, the Senior Village project has failed to progress to permitting; and WHEREAS, after deliberation and careful consideration the Town Council has decided to (1. Allow the property’s Future Land Use and zoning to remain RM-36, 2. Revert the property back to IU-C).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MIAMI LAKES, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. Future Land Use and Zoning. After deliberation and careful consideration regarding the Future Land Use amendment and rezoning of certain 9.445 +/-acre property located on the West side of Commerce Way and NW 146th Street, Miami Lakes, Florida as described in Ordinance 17-206 and 17-207, from Multifamily Residential, RM-36 to Industrial Office, IU-C, the Town Council has decided to (1. Allow the property’s Future Land Use and zoning to remain Multifamily Residential, RM-36, 2. Revert the property back to Industrial Office, IU-C). If the property reverts to Industrial Office, IU-C two separate Ordinances will be necessary.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
Page 3 of 3 Resolution No.
Passed and adopted this ___ day of ______ 2024.
The foregoing resolution was offered by ______________who moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by _____________ and upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Mayor Manny Cid ____
Vice Mayor Tony Fernandez ____
Councilmember Luis E. Collazo ____
Councilmember Josh Dieguez ____
Councilmember Ray Garcia ____
Councilmember Bryan Morera ____
Councilmember Marilyn Ruano ____
Attest: Manny Cid MAYOR
Gina M. Inguanzo TOWN CLERK
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
Lorenzo Cobiella
Gastesi, Lopez and Mestre, PLLC
DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY
02:25:56 Deputy Town Attorney Lorenzo Cobiella explains
Before the Council is the consideration as to whether to rezone to the original designation or continue with Residential... Next, Town of Miami Lakes Planner
领英推荐
Planning
Overview
The Planning Department provides comprehensive planning, development, and design services to ensure that Miami Lakes remains a vibrant, growing community that preserves a sense of place and conserves its character. As part of its role, the Planning Department is here to process the development of Miami Lakes neighborhoods, commercial and industrial districts, as well as prepare plans and regulatory tools to ensure Miami Lakes’ growth and development. Additionally, the Planning Department gathers, updates, and analyzes demographic, environmental, transportation, and infrastructure data to help the Town prepare and plan for the future. https://www.miamilakes-fl.gov/departments/planning/
Susana Alonso P 305-364-6100 Ext 1102 Email: [email protected]
Promises Made / Promises Broken
December 2019 Message from Councilman Joshua Dieguez
Hello everyone,
I wanted to take a moment to further explain my position in favor of the Senior Village Project last night.
First, I want to go over what did not change from the prior approval given in 2017:
Second, I want to discuss what did change from the prior approval given in 2017:
Therefore, in my mind, this made the most sense for our Town’s best interest with respect to a project that was already approved in 2017.
We achieved a long held policy objective of bringing a world class Senior Community Center to the Town of Miami Lakes, secured a development that will serve the needs of our aging seniors for years to come, tie up the land in a manner that will not maximize density and intensity of use (aka less traffic and semi-trucks compared to the alternative), and the developer remains on the hook for payment of impact fees and provision of the senior center.
It may be that the Town could have secured an additional concession or two, but that approach also carries risk. If the “coupling” condition was left alone and as a result the Grahams did not locate or decided not to continue locating an operator for the senior care facility parcel, then all 9 acres of land would revert back to the industrial zoning classification by the end of 2023. According to the testimony of our Senior Planner, who has over 15 years of experience in this field, that classification would have resulted in more vehicle trips in that area than the senior housing component of the project. What’s more, even if no operator is ever found or approved by the Council, then we basically managed to secure 5 out of 9 acres of land for uses that unquestionably result in less trips and therefore less traffic than warehouses or offices. Further, the vested rights the Grahams have on that land would not expire until approximately October of next year and they can be extended, cumulatively, by six months for every emergency declaration called by the Governor in any part of the State, whether for Zika, hurricanes, red tide, or even the opioid crisis. In other words, if just two declarations of emergency are made next year, the Grahams would be entitled by Florida Law to an additional year of vested rights and non-payment of mobility fees.
The Town has been diligently working, for at least two years, to stop this ridiculous loophole in state law, but unfortunately, we have not been able to get much traction to change this quirk in the law.
I understand that not everyone will agree with my decision and that is your right to do so. But I have always believed it is my duty to thoroughly explain my position to you and then let you evaluate my decision-making process and its result for yourselves.
Yours in service, Josh Dieguez, Council Member
Miami Lakers discuss these issues:
Susana Herrera Josh Dieguez thank you for the detailed explanation.
That being said, one of the items that came to light was the “proposed” covenant of 60 years offered by The Graham’s that would detail the terms of said covenant. When asked to produce the covenant document, Council was advised that it had not yet been drafted. At that point, a question was directed to the Town attorney asking if this item could be voted without a review of the covenant documents, and he indicated that it could if the terms of the approval indicated these would be contingent on review and acceptance of the covenant. If the Town disagrees, then the approval would be retracted and the item would return back to the Town.
Also during this process, both the P&Z Sr Planner and the Town attorney were asked if they had time to review the proposed covenant agreement, and BOTH of them went on the record stating that there was nothing in place and they would need more TIME to review terms in order to properly advise Council. That should have been enough for Council to table this matter.
One of our sitting council member has championed elderly affairs in our community for 24 years. More personal and hands on experienced than any other member of this Council, and he was asking the right questions. The Graham’s did not care to negotiate because somehow they walked in assuming this was a done deal.
It should not have been a done deal, and we should have have given the time that Town staff was requesting to properly prepare a fair agreement. The nursing and ALF facility was a critical element to this package.
All of the points you brought above are valid, but there was neither enough information or time requirement to move it forward last night.
Why the rush!?
The Town’s legal counsel and Sr. Planner asked for time, and the Council voted against them. That is a very dangerous precedent to set.
Again, we thank you for the clarification and willingness to engage in positive conversation. I truly appreciate it.
Mirtha Mendez "The 48 hour rule - Any item which does not appear on a lawfully-noticed public agenda may NOT be deliberated nor acted upon." Thank you Josh Dieguez for your explanation.
I am in total agreement with Susana Herrera. The proposed covenant proffered by the Grahams was waiting for you on the dais on 12/10/19 and never made available to the public.
Did you have enough time to review what was being proposed?
Did you get to read it?
This item should have been tabled before the discussion started.
All of the Council members who voted for this did a disservice to the community by not analyzing what was being proposed.
In other words, you did not perform the job you were elected to do.
I am so disappointed!!!
Josh Dieguez Mirtha Mendez I plan to re-watch the meeting and then respond to Susana Herrera because I want to give accurate responses. With respect to your comments, I understand you are disappointed but I read the covenant before the meeting.
It’s part of the reason I was at Town Hall all day following my annual ethics and Sunshine Law training and why I was not there for presentations. I also asked the attorney if they felt comfortable enough with it to render an opinion and Mr. Gastesi indicated that was the case and that he saw no problems with it.
I’ll go back into the tape in case I misunderstood.
Mirtha Mendez Did you get the required 48 hours?
Susana Herrera Josh Dieguez feel free to cue the tape to 2:19:36. Open to continued conversations.
Josh Dieguez Susana Herrera Thank you, Susana. I will take a look at it.
Susana Herrera Josh Dieguez cue tape to 3:56 where Nelson Rodriguez inquires on whether they should vote on dismantling 3 components without agreement to covenant terms. Response is it can move forward conditioned to review of the terms. Not only is it not efficient, it violates every principle I’ve been taught about review and approval process related to contractual practices. It should have been tabled. There was no rush. Also, I look forward to hearing your response to Mirtha Mendez inquiry regarding timely receipt of covenant by Council. Have a wonderful day.
Esperanza Amelia Rodriguez Diaz Councilman Josh Dieguez
First thank you for your thoughtful response.
Your end of year write up reveals a rather methodical approach to decision making and we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to provide bullet point details of what has NOT changed vs. what has changed, it puts the project into perspective. Let's ask:
From: Michael Horgan
Subject: SENIOR VILLAGE APPROVED BY TOWN OF Miami Lakes COUNCIL
Date: December 12, 2019 at 10:13:09 AM EST
To: Hope Reynolds
Hi Hope,
I think the senior village is great and necessary.? Hopefully, the politicians in Miami Lakes don’t turn it into an absentee ballot farm like in Hialeah.? That would be something good to bring up to try and prevent during the planning phase of it.
Take care and keep up the good work,
Mike Horgan
That Train has left the stage... We are done... Luis Martinez, Graham Companies 06-11-2024. We are done, we have beaten that horse for a very long time! No hypotheticals, we are done, I am being honest with you... 03:08 on the dial!