Parking Policy (part 2)

Carpolis had been heavily dependent on automobiles for transportation for a considerable time, but a transformative shift was taking place within the city. The Mayor of Carpolis, an empathetic and forward-thinking leader commonly referred to as the Mayor, initiated a mission alongside Pepet, their devoted and passionate assistant, to propel their cherished city into the contemporary age.

Welcome back to "Urban Tales," a Newsletter where we continue our journey through the city's transformation. In this chapter, we delve into the second and final part of Parking Policy and the profound impact they could have on our beloved Carpolis.

Chapter #10: Parking Policy (part 2)

As the Mayor and Pepet sat in the Mayor's office, the topic of discussion for the day was the city's parking policies. The Mayor leaned forward, eager to delve into the complexities of rethinking parking in Carpolis. Pepet, armed with his fountain of knowledge and enthusiasm, was ready to guide the Mayor through the issues at hand.

"Let's start with rethinking the curb and traditional parking policies," Pepet began. "We have two main problems with on-street parking: high demand and insufficient enforcement. We need to address both of these issues simultaneously."

The Mayor nodded, listening intently. "Illegal curbside parking seems to be a significant concern," he noted.

"You're absolutely right," Pepet affirmed. "A large portion of all parking in the city is occupied by illegal parkers. We must improve enforcement and ensure that regulations are followed. Double-parked vehicles cause even more problems, obstructing traffic flow and endangering cyclists and pedestrians. We need to find ways to address these issues and create safer streets."

The Mayor pondered for a moment before asking, "What about the airport model you mentioned earlier? How can we apply that to our city?"

Pepet smiled, pleased with the Mayor's question. "The airport model focuses on managing parking supply by pricing different lots to distribute parkers among them. We can adapt this concept to Carpolis by encouraging parkers to consider alternative options. For example, employees who spend several hours at work could park a bit farther away and take public transportation or walk the rest of the way. This would free up parking spaces for short-term parkers, such as shoppers or those attending meetings."

The Mayor nodded, envisioning a more efficient distribution of parking spaces in the city. "We also need to consider increasing metering opportunities," he suggested.

Pepet's face lit up. "Indeed! Metering parking is often met with political opposition, but it's a crucial step. We should expand metered parking beyond just retail store fronts and arterial streets. By doing so, we can reduce cruising for free parking and improve curb functionality in dense neighborhoods with mixed land uses."

The Mayor's mind was buzzing with ideas. "What about parking benefit districts?" he asked. "How can they contribute to our overall parking policy?"

Pepet leaned forward, eager to explain. "Parking Benefit Districts, or PBDs, are designated areas where parking is concentrated and affordable close to the city. However, meter rates are set higher in these districts, with the revenue being used to fund parking structures and streetscape improvements. The goal is to create a 'park once' area, where people can park and walk to various destinations. PBDs can help revitalize city and town centers, making them more walkable and attractive."

"Pepet," the Mayor continued, "I believe Park & Ride facilities could be an excellent solution to alleviate congestion and encourage the use of public transportation. What are your thoughts?"

Pepet nodded eagerly. "Indeed, Mayor. Park & Ride facilities, typically situated on the outskirts of urban areas, offer commuters the convenience of free or significantly cheaper parking. By providing easy access to public transportation, these facilities encourage people to leave their cars behind and utilize alternative modes of transportation to reach their destinations."

With Park & Ride facilities in mind, the discussion shifted to another critical aspect of parking policy—maximum requirements.

"To strike a balance between different modes of transportation, we need to predetermine the desired levels of access for each mode," the Mayor remarked. "If we prioritize auto access, we must ensure an ample amount of parking. On the other hand, if we aim for high transit, bicycle, and pedestrian access, we should limit parking availability. What are your insights on setting maximum requirements?"

Pepet leaned forward, ready to share his knowledge. "You're absolutely right, Mayor. The rational approach to maximum requirements is to align them with our desired mode split goals. By carefully managing parking supply, we can encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation and reduce reliance on private vehicles. It's about creating a harmonious balance that caters to the diverse needs of our residents."

Inspired by the potential impact of maximum requirements, the conversation delved into parking freezes. The Mayor was curious to learn more about this concept.

"Parking freezes can play a crucial role in curbing the negative effects of excessive off-street parking supplies," Pepet explained. "By imposing parking freezes, we can prevent the continued expansion of parking facilities that contribute to congestion, harm urban form, and degrade air quality. It's an effective way to encourage alternative transportation options and promote a more sustainable city."

The Mayor nodded, impressed by the power of parking freezes to shape Carpolis' future. "Now, Pepet, let's discuss the idea of eliminating or reducing minimum requirements. How can this reform contribute to our parking policies?"

Pepet's eyes sparkled with enthusiasm. "Eliminating or reducing minimum off-street parking regulations would provide developers and building owners with the flexibility to determine how many parking spaces to provide voluntarily. This shift allows for more efficient land use and avoids overbuilding parking spaces that may go unused. It's a step toward aligning our parking management strategies with the changing needs of our city."

As the conversation progressed, the Mayor and Pepet explored the benefits of shared parking. They recognized that different businesses and establishments attracted visitors at different times, creating a mismatch in parking demand.

"Shared parking is the answer," Pepet exclaimed. "By allowing businesses to share parking spaces, we optimize their utilization throughout the day. Zoning rules that require each establishment to provide its own parking spaces, even if they operate at different times, hinder efficient land use. Shared parking not only improves urban design but also reduces the need for excessive parking facilities."

The Mayor nodded in agreement. "Shared parking has the potential to transform Carpolis into a more vibrant and economically efficient city. We must encourage collaboration and cooperation among businesses to make the most of our available parking spaces."

Finally, the conversation turned to in-lieu parking fees, a strategy employed by several cities to reduce minimum parking requirements and fund the construction of shared public parking facilities.

"In-lieu parking fees offer a win-win situation," Pepet explained. "Developers have the option to pay a fee to the city instead of providing a predetermined number of parking spaces. This not only reduces construction costs, making projects like affordable housing or historic preservation more viable, but also consolidates scattered parking spaces, improving our district's urban design."

The Mayor nodded, his mind abuzz with possibilities. "Pepet, these insights are invaluable. It's clear that our parking policies need to evolve to meet the demands of the 21st century. Let us work together trying to overcome the setbacks that, for sure, LSB (*) will spread up about these new policies."

With a renewed sense of purpose, the Mayor and Pepet concluded their discussion, ready to embark on a journey of transformation. They understood that revamping parking policies was not a solitary task but required collaboration with city officials, stakeholders, and the community. And all this was happening in Carpolis, a city that wanted to change its name.

References

Weinberger, R., Kaehny, J., & Rufo, M. (2010). U.S. parking policies: An overview of management strategies. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy.

?

(*) The MLI stands for the Majority Illusion League and it was a reactive group of people that was fully grasped the significance of their collective opposition, understanding the potential ripple effect it could have on the broader masses. They were the antagonists of our heroes.