The Paradox of Sustainable Architecture: Balancing Durability and Transience in Urban Contexts
Alberto Zancanella
MBA @BBS | Export manager DACH, China and ASEAN area for DDCHEM
I am excited to share with you my latest article on LinkedIn's newsletter, dedicated to the paradox of sustainable architecture. In this article, we will explore the challenge of striking a balance between the durability of architectural works and the need to adapt to the transience of the urban social context.
In today's world, sustainable architecture is a vital response to the climate crisis and the urgent need to reduce the environmental impact of our constructions. However, an intriguing paradox arises: how can we design buildings that are both long-lasting and adaptable to the rapid social and economic changes that characterize our cities?
Durability and Symbols of Power
Looking back at history, we observe how ancient civilizations, such as the Romans, constructed enduring architectural wonders as symbols of power and grandeur. Conversely, Japanese philosophy embraced the concept of transience, as evident in the ritualistic rebuilding of Shinto shrines. These examples raise a crucial question: how do we adapt these principles to the contemporary context of sustainable architecture?
Embracing the Ephemeral in the Modern Context
In the present day, we witness the creation of structures like Olympic stadiums that represent a country's prestige but often become obsolete once the events conclude. This brings forward concerns regarding their long-term sustainability. Traditional shopping malls also face irrelevance due to societal shifts, such as the rise of online shopping. Architects now face the challenge of reimagining spaces to remain relevant in a rapidly evolving world.
The Metabolist Approach
Exploring the Japanese Metabolist movement, which recognized the constant growth of Japanese cities, we discover an attempt to create dynamic buildings that could "metabolize" to meet future needs. However, this approach also highlighted the limitations of predicting the movement's own future evolution.
领英推荐
Embracing Ephemeral Architecture as a Solution
In response to our fast-paced world, ephemeral architecture has gained significance. This approach focuses on creating structures and spaces with limited lifespans, offering flexibility and adaptability. However, it is crucial to address the environmental impact of these temporary structures, such as non-recyclable materials and excessive energy consumption.
Balancing Durability and Transience
In a technology-driven and rapidly changing world, architects face the challenge of designing for an uncertain future. Balancing the desire for architectural permanence and the need to adapt and evolve becomes crucial in shaping the architecture of the future. Sustainable architecture must embrace both longevity and adaptability, creating a built environment that is truly sustainable for future generations.
In conclusion, the paradox of sustainable architecture invites us to reflect on the relationship between durability and transience in the built environment. As architecture professionals, we have the responsibility to design buildings that are sustainable from both an environmental and social perspective, tackling challenges and finding innovative solutions. I look forward to hearing your thoughts and experiences on this topic. Please share your comments below, and together, let's contribute to shaping a sustainable future for architecture.
I encourage you to share this article with your colleagues and subscribe to my newsletter for the latest updates on sustainable architecture.
#DurabilityAndTransience #UrbanContext #BuiltEnvironment #Adaptability #future #futureshaper #innovation #green #greenarchitecture #sustainable
Principal Architect and Founder of Environmental Productions
1 年Architecture it self must be strong, yet adaptable to changing functions, changing tenants, and new needs. The day to day human needs come first. A sustainable building must be loved to endure. Stop the wasteful containerization?and commodification of space. I suggest an old title Stewart Brands "How Buildings Learn" to understand the process of change from actual historical source material. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/320919/how-buildings-learn-by-stewart-brand/
Civil Engineering Professional at CADKEY Services
1 年Yes, it's challenging to design buildings for the future. The future is totally uncertain and designing for it with sustainability aspect makes it more difficult for the designer. Japanese technology evolved from the frequent earthquakes they faced and they went for a simplistic approach. Now 3D printing has arrived and started an evolution already. This makes the author's point more notable and without a common answer.