A paradigm shift in the history of climate change protocols by the UNFCCC

The historical context around the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) agreements provides substantiation for the sustained commitment of the global community towards addressing the matter of climate change. The series of significant accomplishments in global climate efforts began with the Earth Summit that took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. During this summit, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was officially approved. The above-mentioned significant agreement laid the foundation for subsequent treaties, most notably the Kyoto Protocol in 1997, which enforced mandatory carbon reduction targets for wealthy countries. The Paris Agreement, which was founded in 2015, is a notable achievement since it brought together 195 nations in a collective effort to limit the rise in global temperatures and mitigate the impacts of climate change. The subsequent meetings of the Conference of the Parties (COP) have come to play an integral role in promoting international cooperation and shaping the direction of global climate policy. As the United Arab Emirates prepares itself for the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28), it becomes apparent that a collaborative and ambitious endeavour is needed to accomplish the goals delineated in these accords and safeguard the environment for forthcoming generations.

?Significant events such as the Kyoto Protocol in 2015 and the Paris Agreement were focused on the concept of common but differentiated duties and distinct capabilities.

It explores the necessity of amending these agreements to better align with economic realities and facilitate future attempts. The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has established an international treaty to address and mitigate "hazardous anthropogenic interference with the climate system." The document in question was ratified by a total of 154 nations during the United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development (NCED), which is commonly referred to as the "Earth Summit." The Kyoto Protocol, established in 1997, represents the inaugural implementation of a provision of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The formation of this entity was designed to accommodate three distinct categories of signatory states, each of which carries certain responsibilities. The three categories consist of developed nations, which are countries that have achieved advanced levels of economic development; developed countries with exceptional financial commitments, which are nations that possess significant financial responsibilities; and developing countries, which are nations that are in the process of progressing economically. The group of developed countries consisted of a total of 38 nations, with 13 of them being Eastern European countries undergoing a transition towards democracy and a market-based economy. Additionally, this group included countries that were part of the European Union. It is strongly recommended that nations falling under Category 1 undertake the implementation of comprehensive national policies and adopt appropriate measures aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of climate change. These efforts should primarily focus on the reduction of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Category 2 nations are being urged to provide additional financial resources to assist economically disadvantaged countries in fulfilling their obligations to develop comprehensive national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from various sources and the removal of such pollutants through natural sinks. These inventories should encompass all greenhouse gases that are currently not subject to monitoring. In contrast, emerging economies are compelled to submit inventories to the secretariat of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) due to the failure of significant signatory governments to fulfil their respective obligations. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has endeavoured to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions. The Kyoto Protocol is a globally recognized treaty that supplements the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), established in 1992. Its primary objective is to compel participating nations to decrease their carbon emissions following scientific consensus. The primary objective of the Kyoto Protocol is to effectively regulate and stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations inside the Earth's atmosphere, intending to mitigate the adverse impacts of human-induced climate change. The objective of mitigating anthropogenic interference with the climate system, as outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), has been successfully achieved through the reduction of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. The Kyoto Protocol mandated that 37 developed nations, in addition to the European Union, undertake measures to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases.

The Kyoto Protocol granted exemptions to more than 100 developing nations, notably China and India.

In alternative terms, the agreement specifically omitted developing nations. Although they did not emerge as the primary contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during the industrial era, their impact on the Earth's climate was relatively insignificant. The Kyoto Protocol, which was formed in 1999, has been widely regarded as a significant achievement. Nevertheless, there have been concerns regarding the long-term effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol in achieving reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This scepticism arises from the uncertainty around the extent to which industrialized nations can compensate for their emissions while also accounting for the ongoing emissions from developing countries. The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty aimed at addressing the issue of climate change.

The Paris Agreement, which was reached on December 12, 2015, by 196 parties during the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP 21) in Paris, officially entered into force on November 4, 2016.

In contrast to pre-industrial levels, the Paris Agreement aims to limit the increase in global average temperature to well below 2 degrees Celsius, with a strong preference for achieving a limit of 1.5 degrees Celsius. The Paris Agreement is based on a recurring five-year period during which nations undertake significant decarbonization efforts. The Paris Agreement signifies a significant milestone in global climate change efforts, as it is the first instance where a legally binding agreement has brought together all nations to collectively address the issue of climate change and its associated challenges. To effectively execute the Paris Agreement, it is imperative to undertake economic and social transformations that are informed by the most reliable and up-to-date information. Despite concerted worldwide efforts to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, there is a growing consensus among experts that the consequences of climate change, such as prolonged droughts and significant sea level rise, will have profoundly negative impacts. China, despite its status as the foremost global contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, does not possess any formal commitments within the framework of the Kyoto Protocol aimed at mitigating these emissions. During the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP) held in Copenhagen in December 2009, the international community reevaluated the Protocol. The full accession of China to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its active engagement in the global fight against climate change hold significant importance. The Copenhagen Conference of the Parties (COP) did not produce a treaty that carries legal obligations for subsequent COPs. There is a need for the international community to reassess the utilization of the shared but differentiated responsibilities (CDR) framework, which classifies states into two distinct categories—developing and developed—and allocates corresponding obligations. The notion of common but differentiated responsibilities (CDR) entails that developed nations should take the lead in reducing emissions, while underdeveloped countries gradually join in the efforts. The principle of equality is exemplified in international law through the concept of shared but diverse obligations and proportionate powers, which is not a novel idea.

The situation of China inside the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) suggests that the existing interpretation of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is wrong both politically and practically. This is because it fails to include emerging economies, which are significant contributors to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The idea of carbon dioxide reduction (CDR) was not well-received by the general population due to its inability to differentiate between the greenhouse gas stocks of emerging nations and the potential benefits derived from relaxed regulations in this regard. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) explicitly states that two key factors determine a country's climate change obligations concerning greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. One additional issue to consider is the capacity of the system to effectively reduce emissions in a cost-effective and technologically advanced manner. The CDR model is a retrospective framework that prioritizes past contributions to present emission levels and devises obligations that aim to rectify these impacts. The CDR concept entails that industrialized nations are obligated to undertake legally binding commitments to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Moreover, it is incumbent upon sovereign nations to assume responsibility for allocating financial resources and technological advancements to assist economically disadvantaged nations in their efforts to adapt to and reduce the adverse impacts of climate change. In contrast, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) does not impose a mandatory requirement on developing nations to decrease their greenhouse gas emissions or provide financial commitments. The accords place particular emphasis on addressing the challenges faced by countries commonly referred to as "least developed countries" (LDCs) and those that are highly susceptible to the impacts of climate change. The current iterations of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol lack explicit rules about the classification of member countries. The potential consequences of this situation pose a significant threat to the efficacy of global climate change legislation. The Comprehensive Disaster Response (CDR) exhibits robustness and fairness, rendering it a pivotal factor in climate discussions owing to its extensive backing within the global community. However, critics contend that the act of presenting varying understandings of what constitutes fairness for affluent and poor nations carries a significant level of uncertainty. Critics argue that due to the existing scientific ambiguity around the complexities of catastrophic climate change, making accurate predictions about the specific impacts on impoverished nations is a challenging task. Moreover, the critic posits that affluent nations should not bear responsibility for historical emissions inventories, asserting that imposing the burden of compensating for emissions emitted centuries ago on present-day populations is impractical. Detractors exhibited a lack of comprehension regarding the advantageous contributions that affluent nations had bestowed upon present-day cohorts. One significant issue of concern pertains to the pursuit of the aforementioned matter, which has resulted in political turmoil on a global scale. The prohibition hinders nations' ability to properly tackle the issue of global warming. The idea of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) established by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is deemed remedial because wealthier nations bear a significant responsibility for the bulk of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions now present in the atmosphere. However, the current commitment division based on the Kyoto principles of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) does not include a specific category for China and India. China does not fit into the existing classification of developing nations or industrialized nations that have caused environmental degradation during the industrial era. China has been actively engaged in the mitigation of climate change and has made significant contributions towards the achievement of the Post-2015 Development Agenda. The Kyoto Regime presents an opportunity for China to exert significant influence in shaping the forthcoming international climate accord for their respective countries. The proposed adjustment has not only enhanced China's worldwide leadership standing but also served as a testament to China's self-perception as a burgeoning leader shouldering greater responsibilities on the global stage.

On the occasion of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21), which took place in Paris in 2015, nearly all countries in the world ratified the Paris Agreement, which is an internationally recognized international treaty.

Although the Paris Agreement has established a foundation for collaborative efforts towards addressing climate change, the international community is still faced with significant challenges in effectively mitigating global warming to a level that remains comfortably below the 2°C threshold. The climate objectives now stated in the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) of states are insufficient to meet the goals outlined in the Paris Agreement. Even under the assumption of full implementation of all Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), it was anticipated that global emissions would experience an increase from 2015 to 2030. One of the significant challenges encountered during the implementation of the Paris Agreement is the delineation between developed and developing nations. The Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has established clear criteria for the formulation and execution of the agreement.

The 2015 Paris Climate Agreement holds importance within the realm of human rights legislation, not because of its explicit provisions on human rights, which are minimal, but rather due to its recognition of the imperative to address the potential consequences of climate change, including the risk of global temperature exceeding the thresholds of 1.5 or 2 degrees Celsius. The outcome of the agreement may vary in terms of success or failure, but individuals who choose to exert influence over the conclusion still retain the ability to do so. The human rights community is encompassed within this context. In light of the evident threat that climate change poses to human rights, it is imperative to consider the appropriate response of United Nations (UN) human rights organizations. Should the relevant authorities consider utilizing their existing oversight powers to examine the extent to which States Parties are effectively implementing or failing to implement the commitments outlined in the Paris Agreement? Alternatively, should individuals recognize and affirm their entitlement to an environment that is secure, hygienic, conducive to well-being, and capable of being maintained for future generations? Both options have the potential to significantly contribute to the continuing discourse surrounding topics such as human rights and climate change, thereby providing a platform for the global community to express perspectives that are currently insufficiently represented.

Although the Paris Framework does not explicitly mandate the initiation of carbon removal efforts by parties, it does provide a comprehensive set of tools necessary for undertaking such endeavours. The inclusion of carbon removal under the purview of "mitigation" measures is evident in the provisions of the agreement. Article 4 proposes the establishment of a harmonious equilibrium between anthropogenic emissions originating from various sources and anthropogenic emissions resulting from human activities. It further emphasizes the importance of employing sinks to remove greenhouse gases throughout the latter half of the twentieth century. Furthermore, it can be observed that the specific concept of CDR is addressed and regulated by the policy instruments outlined in the agreement. Another objective on a global scale is to

?The objective is to attain a state of equilibrium between anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and the natural processes that absorb and mitigate these emissions, specifically within the latter half of the current century. The semantic interpretation of this term, akin to numerous others within the lexicon of climate discourse, is not readily apparent and lacks clarity upon initial examination. However, the objective was unambiguous: to achieve global carbon neutrality, which refers to the state of having net zero global greenhouse gas emissions. By the year 2050, it is projected that any further greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will be effectively neutralized through the implementation of removal technologies, such as carbon capture and storage.

The Paris Agreement also underscores the significance of providing international financial support to economically disadvantaged states concerning both mitigation and adaptation efforts. The Conference of the Parties (COP) adopted a non-binding resolution that reiterates the objective of securing yearly contributions of up to $100 billion (US). The agreement additionally stipulates the requirement for support in enhancing capacity development, facilitating technical transfer, and promoting climate education. Initiatives aimed at augmenting the extent of forested areas the two clauses pertain to the market. The strategies that were previously outlined in the preceding part may prove to be crucial support tools for the implementation of GHG abatement technology and techniques. Transparency constitutes a fundamental pillar of the Paris Agreement, which received ratification in 2015. The Agreement's adoption of a bottom-up commitment strategy, which mandates Parties to contribute to the international climate change regime based on their national definitions, necessitated the establishment of a robust transparency framework to effectively implement and ensure the regime's efficacy. The principles of the Convention and the Paris Agreement control the transparency provisions, which are seen as procedural norms. Firstly, it is important to note that the Paris Agreement received endorsement from the Conference of the Parties to the Convention. The agreement and its accompanying decision make multiple references to the Convention. These references include the acknowledgement that the Convention's Conference of the Parties (COP) will function as the meeting of the parties under the agreement, the recognition that the Convention's Secretariat will provide administrative support for both agreements and the acknowledgement that any amendments to the Convention will be implemented.

The renewed attention towards addressing climate change has sparked enthusiasm, yet the lack of legal enforceability raises significant concerns around non-compliance. A soft agreement can be characterized as lacking the provision of reliable and steadfast policy measures at the national level. Moreover, the collective commitments are inadequate for fulfilling the 2°C threshold established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

There are two underlying factors contributing to the existence of Rebound. Advancements in the energy efficiency of technology or structures effectively alleviate existing energy limitations, enabling the expansion of activities and subsequently leading to a rebound effect in terms of energy consumption.

Ecosystems have been analogously likened to economies in terms of their capacity to expand in a manner that enhances energy acquisition and conversion. Restricted rationality, both at the individual and organizational level, manifests itself through several factors such as myopia, habits, and inadequate views. These factors contribute significantly to the occurrence of rebound phenomena. For example, individuals actively conserve energy. The individual's well-meaning intentions are hindered by a limited comprehension of the fact that reallocating the saved funds would lead to the emergence of fresh energy demands, together with the significant scale of these supplementary energy requirements. At their essence, the voluntary mitigation pledges, known as the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), are anticipated to restrict the rise in average global surface temperature to a range of 2.5 to 3.8 degrees Celsius. There is an expectation that the commitments will be reinforced on a sequential basis, to achieve the 2-degree Celsius and potentially even the 1.5-degree Celsius targets.

Variations in their economies have an impact on the changes in trade patterns resulting from shifts in nations' competitiveness. The extent of variation in climate policies among countries the occurrence of such leakage might pose potential risks to the effectiveness of emissions reduction initiatives, particularly in countries characterized by high levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as a distinct form of rebound effect. Emissions experienced a resurgence due to the implementation of stringent policies. The act of avoiding excessive rebound was perceived as a supplementary and persuasive rationale for implementing pricing incentives. However, the absence of an international climate treaty renders the establishment of efficient and sufficiently robust price incentives almost unattainable. This phenomenon is exemplified by the current implementation of comparatively limited economic regulations, which are being enacted independently by certain countries or areas.

The lack of substantial international policy coordination and an effective climate impact renders these pricing systems less than optimal.

The implementation of effective carbon pricing mechanisms by countries is contingent upon the existence of an international agreement. This is primarily due to valid concerns regarding the potential negative impact on their global competitiveness. The ongoing discourse surrounding this issue underscores the necessity of an international climate accord. According to the assertion, in the absence of an international climate treaty or a non-binding agreement like the 2015 Paris Agreement, regional and national climate initiatives that are well-intentioned will experience a significant rise in energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Any modification in the agreement or treaty will inevitably facilitate the establishment of a globally uniform and robust carbon pricing mechanism. The article has elucidated the efficacy of pivotal climate energy programs and policies. The advantages and disadvantages of the principle of common but differentiated obligations, as applied in both the Kyoto and Paris Agreements, have been subject to extensive analysis and debate. Despite the existence of numerous supplementary policy instruments for evaluation, it is recommended that a comprehensive assessment and comparison of programs be conducted, incorporating rebound effects as a core component of the policy criterion. In conclusion, as per the Durban Mandate, the Paris Agreement can be characterized as a "legally binding instrument or an authorized mechanism with legal ramifications," rather than being classified as a "protocol under the Convention." The established customary procedures serve as evidence that this factor does not affect its ability to enforce. The intriguing aspect lies in the legal and structural connection between the Paris Agreement and the broader United Nations climate regime, which includes the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the Kyoto Protocol, the Doha Amendment, the Marrakesh Rules, and numerous other decisions and actions established over twenty-seven consecutive conferences.

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?