The Paradigm Shift in Business
A Paradigm Shift: The Purpose of a Firm

The Paradigm Shift in Business

The science of leadership is undergoing a renaissance right now. We hear the term "paradigm shift" almost daily, but what does it mean? Where did it come from?

Thomas S. Kuhn, coined the term when he wrote the book on scientific revolutions in 1962, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", in which he served up a groundbreaking model of how scientific progress occurs. It challenged the traditional view of scientific progress and was backed up with many tangible examples of how revolution works. In a nutshell, Kuhn introduced the concept of "normal science," which he defined as the routine work of scientists within an established paradigm. Scientists solve problems within the framework of the prevailing paradigm, rarely questioning the validity of current thinking.

Kuhn outlined a set of attributes that help distinguish scientific revolutions from normal science and when a paradigm shift has occurred:

  • The accumulation of anomalies: A scientific revolution starts when the prevailing paradigm encounters an increasing number of anomalies or unexplained phenomena that cannot be resolved within its framework. This leads to a crisis in the scientific community as faith in the existing paradigm begins to wane.
  • The crisis and loss of faith: As the number of unresolved anomalies grows, scientists begin to doubt the validity of the current paradigm. This period of uncertainty and crisis is characterized by intense debate and dissatisfaction with the existing theoretical framework.
  • The emergence of alternative paradigms: During the crisis, competing theories and alternative paradigms are proposed to address the anomalies. Scientists engage in "extraordinary science," which involves exploring new ideas and methods that challenge the established paradigm.
  • The paradigm shift: A scientific revolution occurs when the scientific community accepts a new paradigm, resulting in a paradigm shift. This involves a radical change in the underlying assumptions, concepts, and methodologies of the scientific field. The new paradigm provides a new framework for conducting research and interpreting data. He coined this concept.
  • Incommensurability: Kuhn argues that different paradigms are incommensurable, meaning they cannot be directly compared or evaluated against one another. A paradigm shift involves a fundamental change in the way scientists view the world and the standards by which they judge scientific success and truth.
  • Resistance to change: Scientific revolutions often face resistance from scientists who are deeply invested in the old paradigm. This resistance can manifest as reluctance to accept new ideas, denial of the emerging paradigm's validity, or attempts to preserve the old paradigm by modifying it to account for anomalies.

One of the most important things I learned from his book is that without a paradigm, errors cannot be evident and we only learn when we can see errors. Essentially all innovation comes from the perception of error, making error much more valuable than confusion.

I believe the science of leadership is undergoing this major paradigm shift right now from a mechanical, Frederick Taylor and Milton Freidman-influenced paradigm to one that is fundamentally influenced by the science of human intrinsic motivation of people like Edward Deci, Richard M Ryan , and the thousands of social science researchers who have cracked the code on group creativity and human motivation.

It is my observation that the errors introduced by unfettered free-market capitalism purely motivated by profitability and shareholder value are profound and now obvious to most leaders. While profitability is necessary for survival and important for financial investment in the future of all organizations, neither is the goal of the modern organization.

The goal of the modern organization is to solve problems for people in unique ways that help establish long-term relationships between the organization and the people it leads (employees, customers, etc.) This requires creativity.

For business leaders, this is a paradigm shift of the highest order.

References:

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, by Thomas S. Kuhn, Ph.D. (1962)

Principles of Scientific Management, by Frederick Winslow Taylor (1911)

Capitalism and Freedom, by Milton Freidman (1962)

The Oxford Handbook of Self-Determination Theory, edited by Richard M Ryan (2023)

More Thinking:

On North Star Metrics

On Leadership and Creativity

On Relationships and Innovation

Andrea Jones, MBA, PMP, Speaker

Founder | Investor | Speaker | Consultant | Asker of direct questions to clarify intent and help teams execute.

1 年

Intrigued by the science of intrinsic human motivation. Looking forward to more on this paradigm shift.

Marc Emmer

President at Optimize | Keynote Speaker at Vistage Worldwide | Forbes & Inc.com Contributor | Expert Strategy Facilitator

1 年

I agree with Sean. The problem is many people don’t view leadership as science. Many schools don’t even offer business as a legitimate field of study. A paradigm shift is in order.

Sean Flaherty

>> Leadership and the Art of Possibility | The Momentum Framework

1 年

Tim Dodge >> Thank you for recommending Thomas Kuhn's book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions! I loved it.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Sean Flaherty的更多文章

  • Get Closer, Go Deeper >> The Power of Need Granularity

    Get Closer, Go Deeper >> The Power of Need Granularity

    Charlie Munger said, “Whoever gets closest to their customers wins.” But what does close actually mean? Getting close…

    17 条评论
  • Leveraging Self-Determination Theory to Navigate Individual and Group Motivation

    Leveraging Self-Determination Theory to Navigate Individual and Group Motivation

    To solve complex and challenging problems, leaders need to intentionally balance individual and group needs. To…

    24 条评论
  • The Infinite Creativity of Humankind

    The Infinite Creativity of Humankind

    A leader's job is to tap into the creativity of the people within their spheres of influence. On a recent trip to…

    10 条评论
  • The Science of Engagement

    The Science of Engagement

    Engagement statistics are dismal, everywhere I look. The latest Gallup poll shows that "employees in the U.

    14 条评论
  • The Power of Mantras: Elevating Organizational Culture

    The Power of Mantras: Elevating Organizational Culture

    As you scale an organization, your culture will get diffused. As a leader, you have the opportunity to architect the…

    8 条评论
  • Turning Constructive Feedback Into a Power Tool

    Turning Constructive Feedback Into a Power Tool

    I was given some amazing feedback on a talk that I gave to a group of CEOs in Oklahoma awhile back. I took too long and…

    10 条评论
  • The Relationship Between Vulnerability, Competence, and Performance

    The Relationship Between Vulnerability, Competence, and Performance

    When a business or a team possesses great competence, and the shared confidence that results, but fails to rely on each…

    8 条评论
  • More Advocacy, More Innovation

    More Advocacy, More Innovation

    Develop the breadth and depth of your organizational advocacy base, and you will get more innovation. The Inner and…

    9 条评论
  • A Tale of Two Navies

    A Tale of Two Navies

    Four lessons in leadership from the flight deck of an aircraft carrier Have you seen the movie Top Gun? Whether you…

    30 条评论
  • What Makes a Humble Team

    What Makes a Humble Team

    Humble teams innovate more predictably and sustain performance longer. Teams that don’t share gratitude, may perform…

    10 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了