Paper Leviathans: Lawfare does not stop Warfare!

Paper Leviathans: Lawfare does not stop Warfare!

“Covenants with the sword are but words and of no use to any man”.

Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan

?February 14th. There is nothing so galling as to listen to people who have told me I am wrong for so long suddenly popping up in the media to say they knew what was coming. Or, to put it another way, I was right all along. Two questions. Why are politicians so stupid? Will Trump use tariffs to force Europeans to increase defence expenditure?

The answer to the first question is that they are not stupid. Take Britain’s Starmer government. One could be forgiven for thinking that Downing Street is staffed with ideological twelve-year old ‘Special Advisors’ (SPADS) given the nonsense that comes out of it. The latest ‘wheeze’ is that Britain has to give away the Chagos Islands to China puppet Mauritius because the International Telecommunications Union might rule against Britain and that such a ruling might thus put broad spectrum military communications at ‘legal risk’.? You really cannot make this stuff up.

Yes, Starmer has surrounded himself with unworldly left-wing lawyers such as Lord Hermer, who fellow Labour man Lord Glasman this week called the epitome of the arrogant progressive fool.? That is not the real issue.? The hard truth is that Britain and other major western European powers have so neglected their armed forces over so many years they cannot afford to recapitalise them.? British defence chiefs this week warned Starmer that an increase to 2.5% GDP on defence "would not even touch the sides", partly because the cost of the nuclear deterrent means Britain?only spends 1.5% GDP on the NATO-usable conventional force.? ?So, Starmer is hiding behind the fantasy that soft power and lawfare can replace hard power and defence as a protection against high-end warfare.? To mix my metaphors they suggest a Paper Leviathan can replace American military power because Europeans cannot defend themselves.? Such self-delusion will be front and centre in Britain’s forthcoming Strategic Pretence Review. ??

The hard truth is that Starmer, Scholz and the ever more diminutive Macron and the indebted nations they lead cannot square the financial circle between social security, domestic security and national security even though they and their fellow members of the political class are responsible for imposing ever greater risk on the citizens they are meant to lead. Only the Poles and other Central Europeans get Europe’s new and very dangerous reality. Given what is likely to be imposed on Ukraine by Trump this is a tragedy about to get distinctly Greek.? Like it or not, Europeans are going to have to defend Europeans by Trump, who has told Europeans they cannot rely on the Americans for their defence. ‘Der’, I think the SPADs might say if they actually understood how the real world works.

Will Trump use tariffs to force Europeans to increase defence expenditure? Yes, in a word.? At the NATO Hague Summit in June the Americans will likely do the following.? First, talk about the need?to spend 5% GDP on defence as part of a negotiating?ploy. Second, emphasise?how much Europeans spend on defence using American (not NATO) definitions of defence expenditure. Third, reject the idea that Europeans will further increase defence expenditure to 2.5% or 3% (absolute maximum) “but”, to use the British trick, “only when economic circumstances permit”. Fourth, link tariffs to defence expenditure and offer tariff relief to those Europeans who commit immediately to spending more than 3% GDP on defence with a sliding scale thereafter for those who spend more.

Finally, they will put real pressure on Britain, France and Germany who spend some 70% of European defence expenditure and, critically, 90% of defence research and technology investment. They will also demand access for US companies as part of the ‘defence tariffs’ deal. NATO?? Expect the Americans to call for a strategic audit to see how Europeans can get more bang for their existing buck and match what they say they are going to deliver with what they actually deliver. They will also demand accelerated fielding time-limits for new equipment will be vital with buying American off the shelf another way to, buy, tariff relief.

The irony is this: for decades the Americans have been Europe’s defence Leviathan but they cannot and will not fund such a role any longer.? China’s rise makes it impossible. So, Europeans, no more empty words and no more soft power as real power. Above all, no more Paper Leviathans.? Time to step up!

Julian Lindley-French

Spot on.

回复

Far too many see the world through a prism of the world as they lazily wish it to be rather than harshly as it is

Nathan P.

Portfolio Career - ONE TEAM - Resiliency Builder - Scenario Planner - Problem Solver - I have no opinions, only questions.

2 周

Bravo Professor! #truth

回复
Simon B.

Hybrid Warfare | Trade & Commerce | Political Affairs.

2 周

Peacetime leadership, with peacetime staff, ineffectually supported with peacetime civil servants.

回复
Richard Allen Williams, Colonel, USA (Ret.)

Director, DMWC founded as a forum to discuss future security policy with NATO & EU experts

2 周

Julian, incisive analysis as per usual! I hope European leaders understand the gravity of their new defense responsibilities! And the USA appreciates the consequences of its new strategy & all but completely abandoning their European allies!

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Professor Dr Julian Lindley-French的更多文章

  • Fog in the Atlantic, America Isolated?

    Fog in the Atlantic, America Isolated?

    “The settlement of the Czechoslovak (Ukrainian?) problem which has now been achieved is, in my view, only the prelude…

    17 条评论
  • Oslo Security Council Speech, February 3, 2025

    Oslo Security Council Speech, February 3, 2025

    February 7th, 2025. I have just got back from the superb Oslo Security Conference.

    14 条评论
  • A New NATO Deal for America

    A New NATO Deal for America

    FP ARGUMENT An expert's point of view on a current event. A New NATO Deal for America Here is how Europe can meet the…

    4 条评论
  • Atlantic Charter 2025: A New NATO Deal for America

    Atlantic Charter 2025: A New NATO Deal for America

    “For the pace is hot and the points are near, And sleep has deadened the driver’s ear; And signals flash through the…

    13 条评论
  • Syria 2024

    Syria 2024

    “Do not try and do too much with your own hands. Better the Arabs do it tolerably than you do it perfectly.

    4 条评论
  • Virtue Imperialism: Law, Disorder and Power

    Virtue Imperialism: Law, Disorder and Power

    READ THE RETREAT FROM STRATEGY: A TIMES TOP FIVE BOOK ON WORLD AFFAIRS https://www.hurstpublishers.

    4 条评论
  • The Future Deterrence, Defence and Resilience Conference

    The Future Deterrence, Defence and Resilience Conference

    In October, I had the honour of directing the Future Defence, Deterrence and Resilience Conference at Wilton Park in…

    1 条评论
  • Riga Test 2024: Mean What We Say, Do What We Say!

    Riga Test 2024: Mean What We Say, Do What We Say!

    “That’s why I argue that the defence of the UK starts in Ukraine. It’s why I argue that Estonia and the border with…

    7 条评论
  • Athens and Sparta, Israel and Iran

    Athens and Sparta, Israel and Iran

    “The real cause I consider to be the one which was formerly most kept out of sight. The growth of the power of Athens…

    23 条评论
  • The Retreat from Strategy

    The Retreat from Strategy

    Though much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven;…

    19 条评论

其他会员也浏览了