Palindrome Symmetry in Complex Systems: Evolution, Reconfiguration, Feedback and Simplicity

1. Introduction: The Power of Symmetry in Nature

Symmetry is a fundamental concept that governs many physical systems, from atomic structures to the cosmos. It refers to the idea that an object or system remains unchanged under certain transformations such as rotation, reflection, or translation. Symmetry plays a vital role in establishing conservation laws, which are key principles in physics. These laws, such as the conservation of energy, momentum, or charge, emerge directly from specific symmetries present in the natural world [1].

For instance, Noether's theorem links time-translational symmetry to the conservation of energy and spatial-translational symmetry to the conservation of momentum [1]. Mathematically, Noether's theorem can be expressed as:

dQ/dt = ?L/?α

Where Q is the conserved quantity, L is the Lagrangian of the system, and α is the parameter of the continuous symmetry transformation.

In quantum mechanics, symmetry helps physicists predict the existence of new particles, as particles often arise due to symmetries in the vacuum. As scientists search for symmetries, they uncover deeper laws of nature.

2. Broader Applications of Symmetry in Physics

Symmetry also plays a critical role in particle physics, where it aids in predicting the existence of particles. For example, supersymmetry (SUSY) is a theoretical framework that extends the Standard Model of particle physics by proposing that each particle has a corresponding superpartner [2]. It's important to note that while SUSY is a compelling theory, it remains unconfirmed by experimental evidence as of 2024.

Symmetry principles help physicists determine the behaviors and properties of fundamental particles, and breaking of symmetries can lead to the discovery of new phenomena in the universe. These broader applications illustrate how symmetry is not just limited to classical physics but extends into complex realms like quantum mechanics and cosmology.

3. Types of Symmetry

Symmetry manifests in various forms across nature and human-made systems, including:

1. Vertical Symmetry: Also known as mirror symmetry, this occurs when an object can be divided into two identical halves by a vertical line. Many animals and objects in nature, such as butterflies or leaves, exhibit this form of symmetry [3].
2. Horizontal Symmetry: This occurs when an object can be divided into two identical halves by a horizontal line. Examples include certain patterns in architecture or design.
3. Rotational Symmetry: Objects with rotational symmetry appear unchanged when rotated around a central axis. The circle is a prime example of infinite rotational symmetry, as it looks identical no matter how much it is rotated. Mathematically, an object with n-fold rotational symmetry satisfies the equation: f(r, θ) = f(r, θ + 2π/n) Where f is a function describing the object, r and θ are polar coordinates, and n is the order of symmetry.
4. Translational Symmetry: When an object or pattern can be shifted by a certain distance and still looks the same, it demonstrates translational symmetry. Crystals or tiling patterns often exhibit this kind of symmetry. Mathematically, a function f(x) has translational symmetry if: f(x + a) = f(x) Where a is the translation distance.

4. Symmetry in Biological Systems: A Comprehensive Overview

4.1 Types of Symmetry in Biology

1. Bilateral Symmetry: Common in most animals, including humans, where the body can be divided into mirror-image halves along a single plane.
2. Radial Symmetry: Found in organisms like jellyfish and sea anemones, where body parts are arranged around a central axis.
3. Spherical Symmetry: Rare in multicellular organisms but common in some unicellular organisms like Volvox.
4. Asymmetry: Many internal organs and some external features in bilaterally symmetrical organisms are asymmetrical [35].

4.2 The Reality of Biological Symmetry

4.2.1 Imperfect Symmetry and Fluctuating Asymmetry

Contrary to idealized models, perfect symmetry is rare in nature. Fluctuating asymmetry, characterized by small, random deviations from perfect symmetry, is common and can be an important indicator of:

• Developmental stability
• Genetic quality
• Environmental stress

Research has shown that the degree of fluctuating asymmetry can influence mate choice and predator-prey interactions [4].

4.2.2 Functional Trade-offs

While symmetry often confers advantages, asymmetry can also provide functional benefits:

1. Organ Packing: The asymmetrical arrangement of internal organs in vertebrates allows for more efficient use of body cavity space.
2. Specialized Functions: Some organisms have evolved asymmetrical features for specific functions. For example: The asymmetrical ears of owls enhance their ability to localize sound [5]. The asymmetrical claw of fiddler crabs is used in mating displays and combat [6].

4.2.3 Developmental Constraints and Plasticity

Symmetry in organisms is influenced by both genetic factors and developmental processes:

1. Constraint: Some aspects of symmetry are highly conserved due to developmental constraints. For instance, the basic bilateral body plan is established early in embryonic development through conserved genetic pathways [7].
2. Plasticity: Environmental factors can influence the degree of symmetry during development. For example, nutritional stress can lead to increased fluctuating asymmetry in many species [8].

4.3 Evolutionary Perspectives on Symmetry

4.3.1 Adaptive Significance

Symmetry can be adaptive in various ways:

1. Locomotion: Bilateral symmetry facilitates directional movement in many animals.
2. Sexual Selection: Symmetrical features are often perceived as attractive and may signal genetic quality [9].
3. Camouflage: Symmetrical patterns can help in blending with the environment.

However, the adaptive value of symmetry can vary depending on the specific trait and environmental context.

4.3.2 Evolutionary Trade-offs

The evolution of symmetry often involves trade-offs:

1. Energy Allocation: Maintaining symmetry requires energy that could be allocated to other functions.
2. Specialization: Asymmetry can allow for functional specialization of body parts.
3. Developmental Stability: Perfect symmetry may come at the cost of developmental robustness in changing environments.

4.4 Molecular Basis of Symmetry

4.4.1 Genetic Regulation

Symmetry in organisms is regulated by complex genetic networks:

1. Hox Genes: Play a crucial role in establishing body axes and symmetry during development [10].
2. Nodal Signaling: Important in determining left-right asymmetry in vertebrates [11].

4.4.2 Epigenetic Factors

Epigenetic mechanisms can influence symmetry by modulating gene expression in response to environmental cues, leading to phenotypic plasticity in symmetrical traits [12].

4.5 Symmetry Beyond Morphology

4.5.1 Behavioral Symmetry

Some organisms display symmetry in behavior, such as the figure-eight dance of honeybees or the symmetrical territorial displays of some birds [13].

4.5.2 Symmetry in Ecological Interactions

Symmetry concepts extend to ecological relationships, such as mutualism, where both species benefit equally from an interaction.

5. Palindromes: Reflective Symmetry in Configuration

A palindrome is a structure that maintains reflective symmetry, meaning it appears the same when reversed. In its simplest form, a palindrome is a sequence, such as a word or number, that reads identically forward and backward (e.g., "level," "radar," or "121"). However, palindromes extend beyond language and numbers—they can also describe patterns in physical systems where structures mirror themselves across a central point.

Palindromic symmetry is unique in that this reflective property is not spatial, like vertical or horizontal symmetry in objects, but is often conceptual, based on the order of elements in a sequence. This means the symmetry is not visually apparent but exists in how the sequence is interpreted when reversed. Unlike other forms of symmetry that can be easily observed, palindrome symmetry requires a cognitive or computational process to appreciate.

6. Symmetry and the Conservation of Information

Symmetry is crucial in maintaining the conservation of information within evolving systems. Conservation laws typically govern physical quantities such as energy or momentum, but we propose that symmetry may also conserve information—the descriptions or configurations of a system's internal states [14]. In complex living systems exhibiting palindromic symmetry, the system can access and reuse past useful descriptions and configurations as it moves forward in time.

In palindrome symmetric complex systems, information doesn't simply accumulate as the system evolves; it is recycled and spontaneously reconfigured to prevent overload. The Retrieve Backward Loop (RBL) is a retroactive cybernetic mechanism by which palindrome symmetric complex systems retrieve and apply the most useful past configurations, preserving information without generating unnecessary complexity. The past serves as a blueprint, allowing these systems to maintain stability while balancing inherent complexity [14].

Rather than relying on novelty or ever-expanding complexity, palindrome symmetric complex systems prioritize simplicity and efficiency through reflective symmetry. This avoids chaotic or non-linear consequences of information overload. In complex systems, the conceptual reflection of past useful configurations into future states keeps the system resilient and prevents it from being overwhelmed by ever-increasing information—overload may lead to inefficiency in processing rather than a complete lack of information [14].

7. Evolving Toward the Future: Feedback and Feedforward Loops

In palindrome symmetric complex systems, the evolution toward the future is guided by a dynamic interplay between positive feedback and anticipatory feedforward loops [15].

• Positive Feedback Loops: As the system evolves, positive feedback loops drive growth and complexity. They amplify existing behaviors, pushing the system toward new states by reinforcing certain effective patterns [15]. Mathematically, a simple positive feedback loop can be represented as: dx/dt = kx Where x is the system variable, t is time, and k is a positive constant.
• Feedforward and Anticipatory Feedforward Loops: Feedforward mechanisms provide the system with anticipatory insights, allowing it to quickly adjust and adapt to potential future states by leveraging recycled information from the past [15]. These anticipatory feedforward loops help the system predict future behaviors and make corrective adjustments before errors or instability occur. A basic feedforward model can be expressed as: y(t) = G(s) * u(t) Where y(t) is the output, G(s) is the transfer function, and u(t) is the input.
• Discarding Negative Feedback Loops: Palindrome symmetric systems tend to avoid or downplay time-sensitive negative feedback loops. These are less efficient because they require sufficient time to monitor and execute a response. By focusing on anticipatory feedforward mechanisms and positive feedback loops, palindrome symmetric systems lessen the need for constant correction, moving smoothly toward spontaneous future configurations [15].

8. Collective Reconfiguration: Simplicity through RBLs

Palindrome symmetric systems achieve simplicity not only by leveraging symmetry but also through the behavior of collective agents driven by Retrieve Backward Loops (RBLs). These loops enable agents to self-organize and retrieve the most resilient past configurations, simplifying their behavior as they reconfigure toward more efficient patterns.

In contrast to systems where complexity increases exponentially as individual agents have more degrees of freedom to choose from, RBLs inherently drive a strong constriction, reducing the variety of potential actions agents can take. As the collective of agents grows, the available ways of acting to achieve efficient reconfiguration decrease. This arises because larger systems of agents converge on a few simpler, more resilient configurations that have proven useful in the past.

9. Retrieval Backward Loops (RBLs) and Retroaction in Complex Systems

Retrieval Backward Loops (RBLs) exemplify retroaction, a fundamental cybernetic property of complex systems. Retroaction occurs when a system uses feedback from its past to adjust its future behavior. In this process, the system continually draws upon its previous states or outputs to gather information, enabling self-regulation and adaptation. By incorporating past data into current decisions, retroaction allows the complex system to navigate an uncertain future while minimizing abrupt corrections or errors.

In complex systems such as ecosystems, economies, or social networks, retroaction plays a crucial role in maintaining stability and adaptability. These systems rely on feedback loops to sense and respond to changes, utilizing historical information to make balanced, thoughtful adjustments. Longer retroaction loops provide greater stability, adaptation, and resilience by helping the complex system smooth out sudden short-term fluctuations, thus reducing the likelihood of overreacting to unexpected temporary changes.

Ultimately, retroaction ensures that complex systems can adapt intelligently and resiliently over time, leveraging their past experiences to navigate future uncertainties with minimal disruptions. This process of continuous adaptation eventually contributes to the long-term survival of the complex system.

The concept of RBLs and retroaction is particularly relevant in the context of palindrome symmetry in complex systems. Just as palindromes reflect a symmetry in their structure when reading forwards or backward, RBLs allow complex systems to "read" their past states and use this information to inform future states. This creates a kind of temporal symmetry in the system's behavior, where past and future states are linked through the process of retroaction.

10. Fred Hoyle's Ideas with RBLs and Retroaction in Complex Systems

Sir Fred Hoyle (1915-2001) was a renowned British astronomer, mathematician, and science fiction writer who made significant contributions to the fields of stellar nucleosynthesis and cosmology. He is perhaps best known for coining the term "Big Bang" and for his controversial ideas about panspermia and the origins of life on Earth. Sir Fred Hoyle's concept from "The Intelligent Future" (1984) provides a fascinating extension to the idea of retrieval backward loops (RBLs) and retroaction in complex systems [39]. Let's explore how Hoyle's assertion aligns with and expands upon the RBL concept:

10.1 Temporal Symmetry and Self-Organization

The text in point #9 states: "Just as palindromes reflect a symmetry in their structure when reading forward or backward, RBLs allow complex systems to'read' their past states and use this information to inform future states."

Hoyle takes this idea further by suggesting that intelligence "self-organizes beyond time" and "reaches out from all points in the remote and infinite future back to all points in the infinite past." This concept amplifies the notion of temporal symmetry in RBLs, proposing a more profound interconnection between past and future states in complex systems.

10.2 Expanded Retroaction

The text in point #9 defines retroaction as a process where "the system continually draws upon its previous states or outputs to gather information, enabling self-regulation and adaptation."

Hoyle's idea expands this concept dramatically. Instead of just drawing upon previous states, he suggests that advanced intelligence can influence its own past, "feeding itself in the past the very information that will allow it to become so unfathomably intelligent in the remote future." This presents a more radical form of retroaction, where the system not only learns from its past but actively shapes it.

10.3 Long-Term Adaptation and Survival

The text in point #9 mentions that: "Longer retroaction loops provide greater stability, adaptation, and resilience by helping the complex system smooth out sudden short-term fluctuations, thus reducing the likelihood of overreacting to unexpected temporary changes."

Hoyle's concept takes this to an extreme, suggesting that intelligence evolves by creating the longest possible retroaction loop—one that spans the entire timeline of its existence. This could be seen as the ultimate form of long-term adaptation and survival strategy for a complex system.

10.4 Bootstrapping Intelligence

While the text in point #9 focuses on how complex systems use past information to navigate future uncertainties, Hoyle introduces the idea of intelligence "lifting itself up by its own bootstraps." This suggests a cyclical, self-reinforcing process of evolution that goes beyond simple adaptation, implying that advanced intelligence might be capable of engineering its own development across time.

10.5 Implications for Complex Systems Theory

Hoyle's assertion, when integrated with the RBL concept in point #9, suggests that the most advanced complex systems might not just react to past events, but actively participate in shaping their entire temporal existence. This could imply that the pinnacle of complex system evolution is a state where the system achieves a form of temporal omniscience and omnipresence within its own timeline.

In conclusion, while the RBL concept provides a framework for understanding how complex systems use past information to adapt and evolve, Hoyle's idea presents a more radical and speculative extension of this principle. It suggests that at the highest levels of complexity, systems might develop the ability to transcend conventional temporal limitations, creating a self-reinforcing loop of evolution that spans their entire existence.

11. Critical Analysis

While the concept of palindrome symmetry in complex systems presents intriguing possibilities, and the novel cybernetic RBL's can be a potential contribution to complex systems theory, it is crucial to address other contradictory perspectives to the one presented and described in this article [16].

11.1 Asymmetry and non-palindromic patterns in complex systems

There are potential counterexamples where asymmetry or non-palindromic patterns might play equally important roles in complex systems.

In biological systems, asymmetry often confers significant advantages. For instance, the human brain exhibits functional lateralization, where certain cognitive processes are associated with specific hemispheres, leading to more efficient information processing [17]. This asymmetry is crucial for language development, with language functions typically lateralized to the left hemisphere in most individuals [18].

Moreover, at the molecular level, chirality (hand-like asymmetry) is fundamental to life. Many biological molecules, including amino acids and sugars, exist in chiral forms, and life on Earth predominantly uses only one chiral form of each [19]. This homochirality is essential for the proper functioning of biological systems and the formation of complex structures like proteins [20].

In physics, symmetry breaking plays a crucial role in many phenomena. The Higgs mechanism, responsible for giving particles mass, involves the spontaneous breaking of electroweak symmetry [21]. This demonstrates that asymmetry can be as important as symmetry in fundamental physical processes.

11.2 Alternative hypotheses to palindromic symmetrical sequences in DNA

The efficiency of palindromic sequences in DNA, for example, might be due to factors other than, or in addition to, their symmetrical nature.

One alternative hypothesis is that palindromic sequences in DNA serve as recognition sites for restriction enzymes, playing a crucial role in bacterial defense mechanisms against viral infections [22]. These sequences allow bacteria to cleave foreign DNA while protecting their own genome through methylation [23].

Another hypothesis suggests that palindromic sequences facilitate the formation of secondary structures in DNA and RNA, such as hairpins and cruciform structures. These structures can regulate gene expression, DNA replication, and recombination [24]. The functionality of these sequences may be more related to their ability to form these structures than to their symmetrical nature per se.

Furthermore, some researchers propose that palindromic sequences in DNA may be a byproduct of molecular evolutionary processes rather than serving a specific function. For instance, certain types of palindromes could arise from the expansion of tandem repeats or from the insertion of transposable elements [25, 36].

11.3 More established explanations about RBL's

In the discussion of Retrieve Backward Loops (RBL's), where the concept is presented as a novel universal principle, there isn't sufficient critical examination. A more balanced approach would involve discussing the limitations and potential exceptions to the RBL concept [26].

11.4 Increased complexity enhances some system's Stability

For example, while the article emphasizes the importance of simplicity in complex systems, there are instances where increased complexity leads to enhanced system stability and functionality. The concept of degeneracy in biological systems, where structurally different components can perform similar functions, contributes to system robustness and adaptability [27]. This complexity can enhance the system's ability to respond to environmental changes and perturbations.

In ecology, the diversity-stability hypothesis suggests that more complex ecosystems (those with higher biodiversity) are often more stable [28]. While this hypothesis has been debated, recent studies have provided evidence supporting the idea that complexity, in some cases, can indeed contribute to stability in certain ecological contexts [29].

Additionally, in some cases, symmetry breaking rather than symmetry conservation leads to more efficient or stable configurations. For instance, in condensed matter physics, symmetry breaking is crucial for the emergence of various phases of matter and associated properties, such as ferromagnetism and superconductivity [30].

11.5 Evolution may not favor symmetry in all contexts

There's a tendency in the article to attribute purpose or intention to evolutionary processes, particularly in the discussion of symmetry in biological systems. This teleological thinking can lead to misinterpretation of evolutionary mechanisms.

It's important to emphasize that evolution is a process of natural selection acting on random variations rather than a directed process towards a specific goal [31]. The appearance of design or purpose in biological systems is an emergent property resulting from the interplay of variation, heredity, and differential reproductive success [32].

For instance, while bilateral symmetry is common in many organisms, it likely evolved not because of any inherent superiority of symmetry, but because it was a stable solution that emerged from developmental constraints and was favored by natural selection in certain environments [33]. The prevalence of symmetry in nature doesn't necessarily imply a universal principle favoring symmetry in all contexts.

Moreover, evolutionary processes often result in imperfect or "good enough" solutions rather than optimal ones. This concept, known as "satisficing", suggests that traits or behaviors evolve to be satisfactory for survival and reproduction, not necessarily optimal or perfect [34, 37]. This perspective challenges the notion that symmetry or any other feature would be universally favored by evolution.

It is expected that considering a broader range of evidence and hypotheses would provide a more balanced and scientifically rigorous treatment of palindrome symmetry in complex systems. It would also open up new avenues for research and potentially lead to a more nuanced understanding of the role of symmetry and asymmetry in various natural and artificial systems [38].

12. Conclusion

The examination of palindrome symmetry across both biological organisms and complex systems reveals a deep, underlying connection between natural evolutionary processes and system optimization. In organisms, palindromic sequences in nucleic acids and symmetrical patterns in developmental structures are essential for genetic regulation and evolutionary success. Similarly, in complex living systems, palindromic reflective symmetry, along with Retrieve Backward Loops (RBLs), drives simplicity, efficiency, and stability by recycling past most useful configurations for future use.

Just as symmetry in organisms influences movement, environmental interaction, and evolutionary adaptability, palindrome symmetry in complex systems ensures survival through efficient reconfiguration and minimal complexity. Thus, the interplay between biological and complex systems highlights how symmetry, in various forms, is integral to maintaining balance, evolution, and longevity.

The concept of Retrieval backward Loops (RBLs) as a novel type of retroaction information mechanism provides a new framework for understanding how complex systems leverage their past experiences to navigate uncertain futures. This process of continuous adaptation, where systems draw upon historical data to make balanced adjustments, contributes significantly to their long-term survival and resilience.

Ultimately, simplicity and spontaneous reconfiguration of large collectives, rather than individual or centralized innovation, lie at the heart of palindrome symmetric systems' adaptability. These systems survive uncertain futures by dynamically balancing between feedforward and positive feedback loops while drawing on past most successful patterns through RBLs.

As we continue to explore the concept of palindrome symmetry in complex systems, it is crucial to maintain a critical and balanced perspective. While the ideas presented in this article offer intriguing possibilities for understanding system organization and evolution, they should be subjected to rigorous empirical testing and theoretical scrutiny. By addressing potential biases, considering alternative hypotheses, and actively seeking out contradictory evidence, we can refine and strengthen our understanding of symmetry's role in complex systems.

This approach will not only enhance the scientific validity of the palindrome symmetry concept but also potentially reveal new insights into the fundamental principles governing complex adaptive systems across various disciplines. Future research should focus on:

1. Developing robust mathematical models to describe and predict the behavior of palindrome symmetric systems.
2. Conducting empirical studies to test the predictions of palindrome symmetry theory in various domains, from molecular biology to ecosystem dynamics.
3. Exploring the limitations and boundary conditions of palindrome symmetry and identifying contexts where asymmetry or increased complexity might be more advantageous.
4. Investigating the potential applications of palindrome symmetry principles in fields such as artificial intelligence, organizational management, and sustainable design.
5. Further examining the role of RBLs and retroaction in different types of complex systems, and how these mechanisms interact with other system properties.

By pursuing these research directions with a critical and open-minded approach, we can advance our understanding of complex systems and potentially uncover new principles that bridge the gap between simplicity and complexity in nature and human-made systems. The concept of palindrome symmetry, along with RBLs as a novel type of retroaction, offers a promising framework for exploring the intricate balance between past experiences and future adaptations in complex systems.

?

References

1. Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G?ttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 1918, 235-257.
2. Wess, J., & Zumino, B. (1974). Supergauge transformations in four dimensions. Nuclear Physics B, 70(1), 39-50.
3. Lambert, G., & Lambert, C. C. (2003). Bilateral symmetry and the evolution of structure and function in marine organisms. Marine Ecology, 24(3), 227-239.
4. Van Valen, L. (1962). A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution, 16(2), 125-142.
5. Norberg, R. ?. (1977). Occurrence and independent evolution of bilateral ear asymmetry in owls and implications on owl taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 280(973), 375-408.
6. Backwell, P. R., & Passmore, N. I. (1996). Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38(6), 407-416.
7. Gilbert, S. F. (2000). Developmental Biology. 6th edition. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
8. Parsons, P. A. (1990). Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. Biological reviews, 65(2), 131-145.
9. M?ller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta‐analysis. The American Naturalist, 151(2), 174-192.
10. Pearson, J. C., Lemons, D., & McGinnis, W. (2005). Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(12), 893-904.
11. Hamada, H., Meno, C., Watanabe, D., & Saijoh, Y. (2002). Establishment of vertebrate left--right asymmetry. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(2), 103-113.
12. Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2020). Inheritance systems and the extended synthesis. Cambridge University Press.
13. Ghirlanda, S., Frasnelli, E., & Vallortigara, G. (2009). Intraspecific competition and coordination in the evolution of lateralization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1519), 861-866.
14. Lloyd, S. (2000). Computation capacity of the universe. Physical Review Letters, 88(23), 237901.
15. Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18-24.
16. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
17. Toga, A. W., & Thompson, P. M. (2003). Mapping brain asymmetry. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(1), 37-48.
18. Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357-1392.
19. Blackmond, D. G. (2010). The origin of biological homochirality. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 2(5), a002147.
20. Hein, J. E., & Blackmond, D. G. (2012). On the origin of single chirality of amino acids and sugars in biogenesis. Accounts of Chemical Research, 45(12), 2045-2054.
21. Englert, F., & Brout, R. (1964). Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons. Physical Review Letters, 13(9), 321-323.
22. Pingoud, A., & Jeltsch, A. (2001). Structure and function of type II restriction endonucleases. Nucleic Acids Research, 29(18), 3705-3727.
23. Vasu, K., & Nagaraja, V. (2013). Diverse functions of restriction-modification systems in addition to cellular defense. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 77(1), 53-72.
24. Brazda, V., Laister, R. C., Jagelská, E. B., & Arrowsmith, C. (2011). Cruciform structures are a common DNA feature important for regulating biological processes. BMC Molecular Biology, 12(1), 33.
25. Warburton, P. E., Giordano, J., Cheung, F., Gelfand, Y., & Benson, G. (2004). Inverted repeat structure of the human genome: the X-chromosome contains a preponderance of large, highly homologous inverted repeats that contain testes genes. Genome Research, 14(10a), 1861-1869.
26. Flack, J. C. (2017). Coarse-graining as a downward causation mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2109), 20160338.
27. Edelman, G. M., & Gally, J. A. (2001). Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 13763-13768.
28. Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., & Knops, J. M. (2006). Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature, 441(7093), 629-632.
29. Pennekamp, F., Pontarp, M., Tabi, A., Altermatt, F., Alther, R., Choffat, Y., & Petchey, O. L. (2018). Biodiversity increases and decreases ecosystem stability. Nature, 563(7729), 109-112.
30. Anderson, P. W. (1972). More is different. Science, 177(4047), 393-396.
31. Futuyma, D. J., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2017). Evolution. Sinauer Associates.
32. Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. WW Norton & Company.
33. Finnerty, J. R. (2005). Did internal transport, rather than directed locomotion, favor the evolution of bilateral symmetry in animals? BioEssays, 27(11), 1174-1180.
34. Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129-138.
35. Levin, M. (2005). Left-right asymmetry in embryonic development: a comprehensive review. Mechanisms of Development, 122(1), 3-25.
36. Bzymek, M., & Lovett, S. T. (2001). Instability of repetitive DNA sequences: The role of replication in multiple mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(15), 8319-8325.
37. Page, S. E. (2010). Diversity and complexity. Princeton University Press.
38. Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press.
39. Hoyle, F. (1984). The Intelligent Universe: A New View of Creation and Evolution. Michael Joseph Ltd.

?