No Pain, No Long-Term Gain
Image by Aaron Blanco

No Pain, No Long-Term Gain

Don't let volatility confuse you. The world and the markets are far more random than we’d like to think and can imagine. From a statistical perspective, market risks tend to be concentrated in rare but extreme market events which are impossible to predict. Black Monday 1987, negative oil prices, the stock prices of Lehman Brothers or GameStop – the list goes on. All of these are outliers.

At Takahē Capital? we think it’s prudent and necessary to accept volatility and drawdowns rather than following an investment approach that seeks to achieve the opposite but is hazardous to our capital. It’s a form of pain arbitrage, and in order to execute this arbitrage, we need to adopt the mindset of a professional loser. That is, accept a lot of small and somewhat painful losing trades in a process that swaps return-smoothness for resilience and attractive long-term gains.

A painkiller, but not a risk-killer, is to invest in illiquid funds which don’t mark-to-market. You’ll have less pain because the daily return randomness remains hidden from sight. However, it does not mean that you’ll have less risk. It might just be an expensive placebo.?Cliff Asness aptly calls it “volatility laundering.”

How can we put volatility into perspective and avoid getting confused?

Imagine an investment that generates 15% annualized returns with 10% volatility – a superstar Sharpe ratio of 1.5. Using Gaussian statistics, this means that the probability of making a gain in a random year is 93%. However, when we reduce this time horizon down to a single month, this probability drops to 67%.

Now consider a more realistic yet still very attractive Sharpe ratio of 0.8 based on a 20% p.a. return with 25% volatility. The probability of achieving a positive return in any random month is now 59%, and any time horizon shorter than that isn’t much better than 50:50 coin toss.

Source: Takahē Capital

These numbers include some important facts which I believe you should be aware of when investing in funds or other investment products:

  • It may take much longer than you think for your investment to make money – even in the case of an investment with a Sharpe ratio of 0.8. Statistical edges require time and sample size to shine through. Investors therefore need a long-term time horizon for their investment.
  • This in turn requires patience as well as the endurance of some pain as the investment deals with the daily market risks while being on a path to its long-term expected return.
  • Investors who shorten their time-horizon in response to volatility and drawdown tend to underperform as they end up chasing returns. Mean regression is a fact and not a fantasy.
  • Double-digit monthly returns, both up and down, are not a sign of product failure if the fund’s aim is to earn more than 20% per year.
  • Investing isn’t a beauty contest.

Happy Trading & Happy New Year!


Mehul Bapodra

Personal Investment Portfolio Management at Bapodra Investments

1 年

Thank you Moritz Seibert a very interesting article. I think volatility is one of the most challenging aspects to investing/trading. The impact or should I say experience may be different if you are a long term investor compared to a more shorter/medium term trader. Also volatility can differ depending on whether it is a large cap or say micro/nano cap. Some of those who use stop losses will find they get stopped out due to volatility and they may not have factored this in or did not quantify any impact volatility will have on suggested stop losses. There is a view that stop losses are a risk management tool for traders. On occasions it can increase the risk if applied incorrectly. One of the causes of this can be our dear friend volatility.

Abbas Syed

CRE- Private Debt | Improving Your Judgment Certification

1 年

Haven't I learned this the hard way, now I know, When in doubt, Zoom out!! Happy new year Moritz Seibert

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Moritz Seibert的更多文章

  • Bloomberg Is Making Stuff Up

    Bloomberg Is Making Stuff Up

    Oil's wild ride is driven by an opaque group of algorithmic traders - or so they say This morning I came across this…

    11 条评论
  • Trading the Night Effect

    Trading the Night Effect

    The dream of making money while you sleep Yesterday, the Financial Times published an article(1) about the Night Effect…

    10 条评论
  • Juicy!

    Juicy!

    Squeezing every drop out of that long OJ trade Yesterday, Frozen Orange Juice futures have continued their amazing…

    7 条评论
  • March Monthly Market Update

    March Monthly Market Update

    Welcome to our March monthly market update. In our market update, we provide a brief high-level wrap-up of what…

    4 条评论
  • The Costly Mistake of Misjudging Luck from Skill

    The Costly Mistake of Misjudging Luck from Skill

    Following up on a great H2 2014, most trend following CTAs continued to produce strong gains during Q1 this year. Good…

    2 条评论
  • High Volatility Reduces Risk

    High Volatility Reduces Risk

    My last article (Smooth Risk, May 2015) concluded that investors do not necessarily lower their risk by lowering the…

  • Smooth Risk - The Dangers of Investment Safety

    Smooth Risk - The Dangers of Investment Safety

    The CTA industry has changed a lot during the past ten years. New regulations and increased demand from institutional…

    1 条评论
  • CTAs: Equity Hedge, Crisis Alpha, Long Volatility – True or False?

    CTAs: Equity Hedge, Crisis Alpha, Long Volatility – True or False?

    Many CTAs emphasize that their products can produce “crisis alpha,” provide an “equity hedge” and enhance the overall…

    1 条评论
  • Like to dislike trend following

    Like to dislike trend following

    Everyone involved in the systematic trend following business has probably heard it many times, and I have heard it…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了