The Ozempic Effect
Bob Hutchins, MSc
?? Bridging Silicon & Soul | AI Literacy | Digital Anthropologist | Author | Speaker | Human-Centered Marketing & Media Psychology | PhD Researcher in Generative AI | EdTech.
I've been thinking about some possible shifts on the horizon, especially with the rise of what I call the "Ozempic Effect." The landscape of health, consumption, and societal norms seems poised for a significant transformation, and it's got me thinking deeply about the implications, particularly through the lens of marketing, packaging, and the broader cultural shifts we might witness.
What are the broader implications of a society where millions might consume 20% fewer calories due to medications like Ozempic and other similar drugs? If projections I have been reading are correct and 7% of the U.S. population, or 24 million people, could be taking these drugs over the next decade, the impact on food sales could be profound.?
First, let's talk about marketing. I'm curious about how the narrative around snack foods and health foods will evolve. With millions potentially consuming fewer calories due to medications like Ozempic, could we see a dramatic pivot in how foods are advertised? Will the emphasis shift more forcefully towards health and wellness, further stigmatizing high-calorie, low-nutrient options? It makes me wonder if this could signify a slow demise—or at least a radical transformation—of the fast food industry as we know it. Will they double down on targeting those not on the drug, or adapt by offering more health-conscious options?
Then there's packaging. This one's intriguing because it's both literal and metaphorical. On the surface, we might anticipate smaller portion sizes and packaging that communicates nutritional value more transparently. But on a deeper level, how will the packaging of these ideas about health and consumption change in our cultural narrative? Will the virtue of moderation and mindful eating become more prominently featured in the way we "package" and sell lifestyle choices?
领英推荐
The potential socio-economic implications are particularly thought-provoking. The use of Ozempic and similar drugs could introduce or exacerbate a class division based on who can afford these medications and who can't. This disparity might not only affect access to the drugs themselves but could also influence how different segments of the population are targeted by marketers. Will there be a premium placed on foods marketed toward those on these medications, further entrenching societal divides?
I'm also reflecting on the broader societal impact. Is this shift towards medically assisted weight management a positive step forward, signaling a more health-conscious society? Or does it hint at a more concerning trend towards seeking pharmacological solutions to issues that might be better addressed through lifestyle changes and societal reforms? The nuanced debate around these questions and decisions made in the near future could shape our collective approach to health, equity, and consumption in the years to come.
These questions and thoughts aren't only academic to me; they're deeply personal and reflective of the complex web of choices we all navigate daily. As someone deeply interested in the intersections of technology, culture, and human flourishing, I find myself at once hopeful and cautious about what changes are coming in our future.
What are your thoughts about this ‘trend’, or should I say tidal wave?
Providing Comprehensive Diagnosis and Treatment of Endocrine Disorders and Obesity as Medical Director of NorthShore Weight and Metabolism | Educator on Diabetes and Weight Management Issues | Podcast Guest
1 年I've been considering the dynamic between Big Ag, Big Food and Big Pharma for a while. Unfortunately the corporate agriculture and food industries got a big head start, and over many years have shaped this entire landscape of disease- obesity, metabolic disease, cancer etc. As far as treatment of obesity there already is a division- maybe not 'class' division per se, yes on the surface there are those that can afford the meds and those that can't. It's not nearly that simple though. A minority of people can indeed just pay for it. Some can afford the still huge out of pocket cost after insurance. Some have great insurance coverage. The largest segment doesn't have access to decent medical care period, much less support for weight management. It's this population that is most vulnerable to the horrible effects of ultra-processed "food". A slow demise? We should be so lucky. The obesity epidemic didn't result from society NOT being health-conscious, and while the GLP-1 tidal wave may help, it can only do so in concert with a LOT of education, better ethics and appropriate use.
?? Consultante, Coach & Mentore en WebMarketing & Outils I.A. ?? ?? Créativité | ?? Stratégie | ?? IA & Innovation
1 年A fascinating topic! I'm curious to see how the market and food industry will adapt to this potential shift. ???
Director of Member / Customer Experience Design | Geek for Holistic Experience Management
1 年While shifts to greater physical health should always be celebrated, I have to wonder if we'll simultaneously find ways to consider the whole person if we move in the directions you speculate. Without addressing the underlying issues leading to unhealth, it's easy to replace one unhealthy habit or lifestyle approach with another. It's like this classic old WSJ article about the addiction to a seemingly good thing, exercise, it becoming a crutch of disconnection. Can we do the hard work it takes to move beyond the quick pharmaceutical, which may be and is a very important component in the puzzle, and focus on human wellness...or sidestep wellness and think changing one aspect of the person means health has happened, perhaps leaving one issue to be replaced with another? https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703439504576116083514534672
While you are considering this, you may want to examine the considerable costs of treatment for diabetes, heart attack and stroke, the costs for knee and hip replacement. I could go on. Are we not better off with a healthier culture? I detect an alarming bias on your part, likely because you haven't done your homework. Most people are not using Ozempic to lose weight to fit into Marilyn Monroe's dress for the prom, they're doing it for health. And they are not doing it without the changes to diet and exercise that simply were not working.