Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) as a Quality System Metric

Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) as a Quality System Metric

Aside from meeting specific quality system standard requirements—such as those found in ISO 9001 or IATF 16949—well-designed quality system metrics also can serve as meaningful indicators of the strengths and weaknesses of an organization’s various processes.

As a quality manager, I often consider how precisely our quality system objectives and other metrics describe the effectiveness of our processes. One metric I started using recently—overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)—has provided our management team with a composite measurable that encompasses three major branches of our operation: maintenance, production and quality.

Over the past three decades—during which standardized quality systems have taken a prominent role in manufacturing—certain metrics have risen to the top as the most common key indicators of performance in each of these three areas.

Consider this simple example to see how common key indicators work together to form OEE:

Machine availability is a commonly used indicator for measuring the effectiveness of an organization’s maintenance process. It is calculated as the ratio of a machine’s actual run time to its scheduled run time. In some organizations, operator breaks and tardiness can reduce a machine’s run time, but unplanned outages because of maintenance problems always reduce availability.

For instance, if a machine was scheduled to run for eight hours during a given shift, but it actually ran only 6.1 hours, then its availability was:

(6.1 / 8.0) = 76.3%

For production, efficiency is a key metric calculated as a ratio of the number of parts produced in a certain amount of time to the maximum number of parts that could have been produced in the same amount of time.

For instance, if a time study demonstrates that the same machine can produce 2,500 pieces per hour, and during our example shift it produces 13,000 pieces in the 6.1 hours it ran, then this operation had an efficiency of:

(13,000 / 6.1) / 2,500 = 85.2%

Quality is often measured as the ratio of the number of good parts produced to the total number of parts produced. So, if only 12,770 of the 13,000 in our example shift met the customer’s specifications, the measure of quality acceptance was:

(12,770 / 13,000) = 98.2%.

OEE is then calculated as the product of these three metrics:

OEE = % Available x % Efficient x % Acceptable

So for our example, the OEE is:

OEE = 76.3% x 85.2% x 98.2 = 63.8%.

In his book, Overall Equipment Effectiveness, Robert Hansen details the OEE evaluation scale shown in Table 1. According to the scale, the OEE of this process is unacceptable.

More importantly than comparing their organization’s OEE to a general table like the one shown above, manufacturing professionals can gain better insight into their operation by comparing the OEE metrics of part families, time periods, or other logical groupings. When applied to the bottleneck operation in a process flow, OEE can also provide a powerful indicator of the potential sales lost due to system deficiencies.

Developing and using metrics such as OEE that highlight an organization’s best opportunities for improvement have the potential to unlock the next level of profitability.

Reference:

1. Robert C. Hansen, Overall Equipment Effectiveness: A Powerful Production/ Maintenance Tool for Increased Profits, first edition, Industrial Press Inc., 2011.

Ray Harkins is the General Manager of Lexington Technologies in Lexington, North Carolina. He earned his Master of Science from Rochester Institute of Technology and his Master of Business Administration from Youngstown State University. He also teaches manufacturing and business-related skills such as Quality Engineering Statistics, Reliability Engineering Statistics, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Root Cause Analysis and the 8D Corrective Action Process through the online learning platform, Udemy. He can be reached via LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/ray-harkins or by email at [email protected].

#OEE #SixSigma #Operations #IndustrialEngineering #Quality


Jeremy Panitz

Open to quality technician, entry-level engineering, or administrative / clerical positions.

4 周

Interesting article. Though if one could have 99.0% for each of the 3 categories the max OEE possible is then 97.0299%. the problem then is how to accomplish this given that each category has specific needs: machines require downtime for maintenance or tooling adjustments or even for speed incrementing, & quality requires training or coding verification, & production speed is possibly a merger of these two.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Ray Harkins的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了