Outcomes-Based Commissioning: Eh?

Outcomes-Based Commissioning: Eh?

I didn't really understand what it meant either, until quite recently...

But within my journey working in our care sector, I’ve come to realize the true impact of outcomes-based commissioning, and its potential to transform our approach to care.

This approach, which shifts our focus from traditional “time and activity” based models to strategic and individual outcomes, has the power to revolutionise the way we deliver care. I’d like to share my understanding of outcomes-based commissioning and reflect on why it is so crucial for our sector.

First of all, what is it?

Outcomes-based commissioning is a model that prioritises the results achieved for people by care providers, rather than the processes they follow. This model is designed to ensure that the care provided truly meets the needs of individuals and the wider population.

As commissioners and providers, we are navigating an era of significant change, with new government policies and evolving societal needs. It's time to think differently, but how do we get there?

Understanding Outcomes-Based Commissioning

As the costs of social care rise, it's becoming increasingly important to ensure that we deliver real value across society - this isn't just about people surviving - it's about people thriving.

Outcomes-based commissioning emphasises:

  • Setting specific, measurable goals before commissioning a service.
  • Providers being accountable (with support from commissioners) for meeting those outcomes.
  • Tracking qualitative and quantitative data and metrics to monitor progress.
  • Allowing flexibility for providers to innovate and find efficiencies.

This approach aligns closely with outcome-based care planning, where the focus is on person-centered outcomes. However, it’s important to recognise the complexities involved...

Advantages and Challenges of Outcomes-based Commissioning

One of the key advantages of OBC is its focus on results, which drives quality and innovation. Providers are incentivised to achieve clear goals, leading to creative solutions that benefit those in need. However, this model also places significant risk on providers in today's economy, which can impact workforce sustainability. It's also tricky to define and measure outcomes, especially as individual needs change. Flexibility, regular communication and adaptability is required on all sides - and this is challenging to manage with increasing wider societal needs (and larger caseloads).

Lessons Learned and Moving Forward

Through my experiences, I’ve realised that commissioning for outcomes requires a delicate balance of flexibility and precision. Clear, measurable goals are essential, but so is the ability to adapt to changing needs. As we move forward, I believe the following strategies can help #commissioners navigate these challenges:

  1. Fostering Collaboration: Building strong, collaborative relationships between commissioners and providers is key. Shared accountability, goals and open communication channels can help align efforts and ensure everyone is working towards the same outcomes.
  2. Emphasising Flexibility: Whilst clear goals are important, it’s equally crucial to allow for flexibility in how those goals are achieved. This can lead to innovative solutions that better meet individual needs. And it also allows for humanity - people's goals change, and it's okay to go at each individual's own pace.
  3. Supporting Providers: Recognising the risks providers take on is essential. Ensuring regular communication and offering support during challenging times can help maintain workforce sustainability and high-quality care.
  4. Utilising Data Effectively: Tracking and analysing data is critical for monitoring progress and making informed decisions. Effective data use can also help address potential tensions and conflicts by providing a clear picture of what’s working and what needs adjustment.

Commissioning for outcomes is not without its challenges, but it holds immense potential for improving care quality and efficiency. By embracing flexibility, fostering collaboration, and supporting our care workforce, we can navigate the complexities of this approach and deliver truly person-centered care.

At Catalyst Care Group , we are committed to working alongside commissioners to achieve these goals. We understand the challenges you face and are here to support you in delivering the best possible outcomes for those in need of support. Let’s continue to learn, innovate, and drive positive change together.

Thank you for taking the time to read my reflections. If you have any thoughts or would like to discuss how we can work together, please feel free to reach out. Together, we can make a meaningful difference in the lives of those we serve.

Emma Nichols

Independent Consultant / Freelancer - supporting tech development and innovation to improve lives

4 个月

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this. Outcomes Based Commissioning has to be the future and is something I would love to get involved in, I believe that people with LD can really thrive with this approach. Partnership working and transparency is fundamental to ensure that providers and commissioners work together to make this happen. Tech can play a pivotal role in supporting this model but providers need to feel reassured that this approach will not hit their income, they are struggling as it is. Change is always scary but this has to be the way forward in my view.

Waqar Khan

UK Director ex SLB ?? | Oil & Gas | Projects Supply Chain Commercial | Offshore DeepWater Unconventionals | Digital | Business Development | Sales

4 个月

Hi Ashleigh Fox there are opportunities to leverage digitalisation towards achieving better outcomes. Happy to chat anytime.

Catherine O'Rourke

Director of Strategy and Transformation Health and Care - Commissioning and Business Development

4 个月

Have always been pro outcomes based commissioning models, however it needs commissioning body commitment and courage and time to show system dividends, but positive impact on individuals should be immediate. Important thing is getting the provider sector signed up and raring to go. I believe ( and have been there with Providers) the LD provider sector will get behind this.

Absolutely love this and completely agree with you. Would love to hear from our commissioning colleagues though. Is there sufficient motivation [pain] with the current model for anyone to want to change it? Is it broken enoigh for anybody to want to fix it?

jake banbury

Steward at Exeter City Football Club and volunteer for the national autistic society

4 个月

Insightful!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了