Is Our Education System Optimizing For The Wrong Outcomes?
Pixabay

Is Our Education System Optimizing For The Wrong Outcomes?

I have come to the conclusion that we’re not optimizing for the right outcomes as we move students through today’s educational system. In any endeavor, we have goals and we have constraints we face when pursuing those goals. Given the constraints, how we choose to optimize our effort toward meeting our goals has a huge impact on the actions we take and the outcomes we achieve.

In this post, I’ll outline where I think we’re getting it wrong … causing us to churn out a lot of graduates who don’t necessarily have the skills they need to succeed in the real world. While my observations are based on my knowledge of the discipline of data science and my personal experience in the business world, I believe that the same concerns apply much more broadly. ?

?

Some Real-World Examples To Illustrate The Problem

A year ago, I was stuck in an airport due to a flight delay. There was a group of 6 - 7 students from a highly respected university that is universally considered a “top tier” institution. As a result, the grades and test scores required to gain admission mean that only the highest achievers will be accepted. I ended up chatting with the students for 15 or 20 minutes and they all seemed genuinely nice and bright.

After we moved on, I turned to my travel partner and commented that while they seemed nice and bright, there was only one that I would consider hiring. Most of the students were awkward, didn’t make much eye contact when talking, and didn’t exude any level of confidence in a social setting. I certainly couldn’t have put them in front of a client or an internal executive.

In another instance I was watching a high school sports award ceremony. Multiple team members went on stage for their awards and smiled, shook hands with the coach, and faced the audience for pictures. Then the student who received the “best grades” award walked up with his eyes down, did a limp and brief handshake with the coach, and then stared at the ground for the picture. Like the students in the airport, he was awkward and didn’t exude any level of social confidence even though his grades and, presumably, test scores were top notch. ?

?

These Weren’t Isolated Instances – They Are A Product Of Today’s System

The above examples didn’t happen by chance, and I’ve seen similar situations many times. The students in the examples are what we are optimizing for. With our massive focus on grades and test scores, we reward students who do what it takes to maximize their grades and test scores. In their eagerness to succeed, many students fail to focus on being well rounded and learning to interact with others. While we push students to optimize their grades, we simultaneously and unintentionally push many of them to stunt their growth in other areas like social skills and emotional intelligence. I often see teenagers sitting together but not talking. They are on their phones constantly and sometimes even messaging those right next to them via their phone instead of talking to them directly.

If we optimize for grades and test scores, we’ll graduate students who have great grades and test scores, but who don’t necessarily develop those other traits. Worse, many of those students may not even recognize that those traits are necessary and desirable once they hit the workforce. One of the most common topics raised by analytics and data science executives on my webcast is the fact even in a highly technical field like data science, things like soft skills, communication skills, and emotional intelligence are critical for success. They are also hard to find since so many people in our field are focused purely on the technical aspects of our work.

?

How Do We Fix It?

I doubt we can go back to the days when an in-person interview was part of a university admission process, but there are steps we can take. Some time ago, I talked about the idea of apprenticeships for technical fields. Those would take place outside of, but alongside, a student’s academic program. However, there are steps that schools and universities of all levels can take to help produce more well-rounded students. A few ideas:

  • Require team-based project courses starting even before high school so that students learn to work with others effectively in a team environment.
  • Require students to present and explain their work, both in writing and verbally, to their peers, teachers, and others in the community in a variety of settings.
  • Make joining clubs, playing sports, or other group social activities a requirement rather than an option.
  • Teach courses focused on 1) communicating effectively, 2) listening to, and understanding, the viewpoints of others from different fields and with different skills, and 3) handling and managing conflict.
  • Stress to students that while grades and test scores are important, they aren’t the only goals they should focus on in school or in life.


I like to think that progress is being made. I know that at our program at Kennesaw State University, we push experiential learning and have some innovative courses - both released and under development - that focus heavily on those soft skills. But, we still have a long way to go as does most of today's educational system.

Perhaps what’s needed most is for the customers of the education system - employers, parents, and students - to ask for change. As long as we allow educational success to be focused mostly on maximizing grades and test scores, we’ll continue to often achieve a local maximum of student preparedness for the real world rather than a more well-rounded global maximum. Students and their careers would be well served if we change the outcomes we optimize for.

?

I'm missing something from the discussion, but that may be because I'm not an expert or insider - I'm just a product of and a customer (I have paid for the product also). As with all optimisation problems the objective and the metric are critical to the outcome. From my analysis, the education system has three objectives: to produce more academics (self propagation); to produce academic research (development of the system and society); and to produce educated people (the personal and societal benefit). The commercial benefit is indirect: a side benefit of the second and third outcomes. We could discuss whether that's correct (I'm European and education looks different here) or whether it's a separate optimisation objective in its own right, but I think that doesn't affect my discussion. By choosing the examples you have, you're giving the third objective primacy. I think many would disagree. These awkward youths you highlight may be well suited to the first two objectives / roles even if not the third, so they don't mean that the system has failed and nor does it mean that these individuals will, in some way, either be unsuccessful or not have fulfilling & valued lives.

回复
Dr. Leo Grassi

Instructional Scientist

9 个月

While I would agree with the state of our education apparatus as well your suggestions to refocus on what's missing, I would add that there also needs to be a broad cultural shift. Let's place the sports and entertainment industries in proper perspective and begin placing greater emphasis on the virtues of being well educated. Paying millions of dollars to individuals who dribble, kick or throw a ball while educators across our country struggle to meet basic needs is unconscionable.

回复

As a high school principal of 16 years (and one at a specialty arts high school for the past 8), I can say that I agree with you. It is, in part, why I love the arts so much; they teach these skills which are embedded in the content, the teaching, and the doing. Our staff spent a full day this month, and all of our PD time on Friday, talking about how to even further embed these "soft-skills" into our work - problem solving, critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, team-work, etc. What I have found is that it's not the students who push back on this style of learning, but rather our parents and communities. These skills are hard to quantify by systems, states and even universities. Even in the arts, we have students who can jump through hoops of online course work, without any need to learn applicable and relevant skills. When you look at accountability report cards, that all public schools are graded by, there are only "tested" scores posted. Districts and principals are balancing what should be taught vs what is being tested.

Niels J?rgen Brandt

Fures? City Council, former Vice President Teradata EMEA

9 个月

Excellent article Bill Franks ! Made me think of the book that Peter Scheele published last year exactly on the importance of soft skills: https://www.amazon.com/12-Universal-Skills-Beginners-Successful-ebook/dp/B0BK6WTVS3. He is now teaching this to young professionals / graduates at companies like Novo Nordisk.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了