Orientation and Center of the Universe

?

Without a boundary there can be no center of a circle. Without a boundary there can be no center of a sphere. Without a boundary there can be no actual physical knowable center of a universe. Without a boundary there can be no physical object.

?

Without a center there can be no orientation. In this context another name for center is ground. I am not talking about ground, say for physical electricity. I am using ground in the context of immaterial ego consciousness. Ego consciousness is the necessary ground for all orientation, physical or any other kind of orientation.

?

The boundary of our whole physical universe is necessary, nevertheless that boundary is not empirically observable. To observe the boundary of our whole physical universe, one option would be to go to the boundary and look at it. However, within the limits of current technology that is impossible. It is also impossible within the physical speed of light limit. Even if we reach the “boundary” we could not be sure if what we observe is a real final boundary, outside of which is nothing (at least by common assumption in fundamental physics cosmology), or simply some sort of barrier that we could penetrate and pass through. For instance, perhaps if we pass through the barrier and look back at it, say from another universe, we could coherently determine we are observing the boundary of our universe.

?

Another option would be to observe electromagnetic radiation, say visible light electromagnetic radiation, that travelled from that boundary all the way to Planet Earth. All the visible light radiation that reaches us from deep space is light from the past. It is light in the present because we see it right here right now as we look at it, but we know it had to travel to reach us. The origin of that light occurred some elapsed time ago, say some quantity of seconds or lightyears.

?

Lightyear is a measure of physical distance and time in a single number; light propagating at speed of light traversing some physical distance. We know by reference to empirically observable redshift that the oldest light that has had time to reach us (we do empirically observe the light and we can specifically measure the redshift of that light), is approximately 14 billion light years old. However, we know the age of the whole universe is much older than that, and the boundary is necessarily much farther away. We know from empirical observations that planets, stars, galaxies and solar systems occupying the emptiness of space are getting farther apart (the distance between those objects is observed to be increasing). When light from distant galaxies travels through space, it gets stretched due to the expansion of the universe, causing it to shift towards the red end of the spectrum. This phenomenon is known as redshift. By measuring the degree of redshift, astronomers can determine how fast the universe is expanding and estimate the distance to the light source and can estimate the age of our whole physical universe object.

?

Empirically observed distances between objects occupying the emptiness of space reveal those objects are so far apart that they must be moving apart faster than the speed of light limit, therefore the boundary of our whole physical universe is moving away from us faster than the speed of light, which means we will never be able to catch up to it and never be able to empirically observe that boundary.

?

“In the November/December 2015 edition of StarDate Magazine, I quote Merlin as follows, ‘Astronomers see the earliest galaxies as they looked about 13 billion years ago. Since the time when those galaxies emitted the light that astronomers now detect, though, space itself has expanded, so the galaxies are now 48 billion light-years away.’

?If those galaxies are moving away from Earth at nearly the speed of light, you would expect they could only be about 26 billion light-years from Earth when we detected their light of 13 billion years ago. So, those galaxies moved at least an ADDITIONAL 22 billion light-years away in the 13 billion years it took their light to reach us.” Ask an Atronomer.org, 02 October 2022, https://askanastronomer.org/bhc/faq/2015/11/09/is-space-expanding-faster-than-light/

?

We see lots of light from the past, but we cannot see light (or any other form of electromagnetic radiation) all the way from the boundary of our whole physical universe. Unless we invent some technology that permits human beings to jump between two locations separated by any possible physical distance, literally instantaneously, like “Beam me up Scotty,” we will never empirically observe any boundary of our whole physical universe. No one can arbitrarily rule out that kind of technology will be invented, but it will not be any time soon enough for those of us alive today, to matter.

?

So, what meaning can coherently be bestowed upon the abstraction concept, center of our whole physical universe? It is incoherent to claim there is any knowable center of our whole physical universe without acknowledgment of ego consciousness. Only immaterial ego consciousness does abstraction. No physical object can abstract anything; certainly, physical particles do not do abstraction.

?

Only ego consciousness can make any possible determination of some imagined physical center of our whole physical universe, no physical particles imagine anything. That center is some specific orientation, but orientation to what? The only possible orientation is to a private instance of ego consciousness docked to a physical body/brain/central nervous system. In fact, each unique private personal ego consciousness provides exactly the same kind of orientation. Furthermore, collective ego consciousness, which I call enself, is ultimately simultaneous, which I define to mean, occupies the total set of Euclidean empty zero points, and that set of points occupies everywhere, without exception, inside the space boundary of our whole physical universe object.

?

It is a sound logical inference to declare that the center of our universe is exactly where the mind of any human being is, and the mind is exactly one private ego consciousness docked to exactly one physical body/brain/central nervous system live organism. Therefore, the center is everywhere all at once. That is the only coherent determination of center of the universe. There is no coherent determination of any actual physical center. No kind of geometry permits any such calculation.

?

We can hypothesize about a possible center of the physical universe and that possible center is real, which means exist and true, but it necessarily resides as conserved meta-information first information inside the meta-information first information matrix hosted inside near-existence domain. Nothing in near-existence domain is actually physical, yet. No actual physical object inside actual existence domain could exist unless there was an information blueprint establishing the identity conditions for that object, including any actual physical center of our whole physical universe.

?

Therefore, the only center of the whole physical universe is necessarily the possible physical center, not the actual physical center. That is the same as a pair of quantum particles, say electrons in superposition, in coherence of spin-up ? and spin-down ? exist only as probability of possible existence in near existence domain, not yet actual physical particles. However, the superposition of a pair of electrons will be resolved by decoherence to exactly one physical electron in some specific physical spatial location at some specific temporal real clock time, but the possible center of the universe will never be an actual physical center, because the only actual center of the whole physical universe is every private instance of immaterial ego consciousness. No actual physical center will ever be determined, rather it remains forever a mathematical abstraction, and no mathematical abstraction is actually physical. Without exception, mathematical abstractions are immaterial objects.

?

The only meaning anything, immaterial or physical has, is bestowed meaning and only ego consciousness bestows meaning, nothing physical can bestow meaning. The only coherent bestowal of meaning, including center of the physical universe is if it is oriented, and oriented means with reference to an instance of ego consciousness that bestows that meaning.

?

A physical center necessarily depends upon orientation. An abstraction center necessarily depends upon orientation. Orientation depends, 100%, upon ego consciousness to intentionally choose to bestow meaning, which makes that ego consciousness literally the center of the universe, which means the orientation is with reference to that ego consciousness. Only ego consciousness inside actual existence domain chooses and acts intentionally.

?

No physical machine, and no physical program of artificial intelligence can be center of the whole physical universe, because they are strictly ontologically limited to some exact specific physical spatial location at some exact temporal real clock and calendar time. No such position could coherently be interpreted to be center of the whole physical universe, since they all occupy locations on Planet Earth, or some object rotating around Planet Earth.