Organizational Learning:  Reimagined and Redefined for our time

Organizational Learning: Reimagined and Redefined for our time

Nothing gets in the way of organizational learning like hierarchies. And most organizations are rigidly hierarchical, designed around the assumption that those at the top are mostly all-knowing and all-seeing. There is an assumption that decisions get better the higher up the organization they are made. And whatever decisions are made, everyone else is expected to follow and implement them.


This is a huge contradiction. It means organizations can’t learn from, respond to and adapt to change. Information, knowledge and expertise can’t filter around or into organizations because hierarchies, structures and processes work against the free circulation of knowledge and expertise. This means organizations have a hard time responding quickly to their changing environment, resulting in a misalignment between what organisations need to do in order to be agile and the model of learning they follow. It also results in a disengaged, disempowered workforce - people know their role is to follow orders and to obey the laws of hierarchy. It’s not to ask questions or make suggestions or think about how they could do their jobs better and help the organization do its job better. And it means organizational learning doesn’t happen.

?

To achieve organizational learning, we must build alternative network structures alongside the traditional hierarchy, so that everyone has an equal voice. Why? Because organizational learning encompasses everyone within an organization, from the most senior to the most junior. It’s a way of being and working, as well as learning. It’s the way that individuals interact with each other to ensure that expertise, knowledge, challenges, problems and learning are widely and freely shared around the organization, without stigma. And that knowledge from outside the organization is rapidly imported, debated and acted upon (if necessary), in order to keep the organization focused on what it needs to do and to realign itself constantly with the changing external environment. Organizational learning is about teamwork, alignment and agility, essentially.

?

When organizational learning exists, people feel able to communicate freely with each other. They are able to open up and ask questions, admit mistakes and say that they don’t know something, without fearing that those around them will see it as a sign of weakness, a sign of incompetence. They work and learn together, sharing challenges, ideas and thinking. This is a healthy workplace, one where people are empowered, not because they know everything but because they made a strong contribution to solving challenges, because they share successes and failures freely, and they are willing to help their peers.

?

This is about a healthy organizational culture. There needs to be a culture of learning, of curiosity, of trust and openness. The kind of culture that many organizations talk about but make no effort to establish. The reality is that many organisations have a toxic culture, one where people are punished for asking for help, where they don’t admit that they don’t know something and they would certainly never admit that they had made a mistake.

?

I have worked in so many organizations where trust is low to non-existent, where there are hierarchies of permission and I don’t mean just one or two levels. I used to run creativity workshops and one of the questions I liked to ask was: “If you want to spend $100 to try something out, how many levels of approval do you have to get?” And people would say “five or six levels”. If you’ve got five or six levels of approval to spend $100, you can kiss goodbye to innovation, to people doing things that might just enable them to do their job better, to their organization performing better. These are small amounts of money - $100! - just to try things out that could revolutionise the organization.

?

There’s plenty of research that backs up what my experiences tell me. There’s a McKinsey study of corporate decision making, for example. It found that decision making chews up so much time in organizations and is often ineffective due to various factors - a lack of real debate, convoluted processes, death by committee, unclear organizational roles, information overload and disempowering company cultures. Of the 1,200 global managers, fewer than half said decisions were made in a timely fashion (no agility in those companies then). McKinsey calculated that 530,000 days of managers’ time would be lost in a typical Fortune 500 company each year.?

?

The report also shows that it’s not just junior employers who are disempowered and disengaged – there’s a lot of managers who are also disillusioned, bored and fed up. These are people who have been promoted, potentially several times, and they’re still not trusted to make good decisions. Once these kinds of attitudes and barriers are in place, a culture of just doing what’s required sets in. People aren’t going to come up with ideas or solutions to problems. They aren’t going to seek out or share learning. They will do the job in front of them, but nothing more.

?

These barriers and hierarchical structures and attitudes need to be dismantled. Organizations need to foster a culture where people put their hands up to ask for help and to offer ideas and share insights. It can be done but it requires a whole new way of looking at organizations and organizational learning.

?

I will talk about this and more in my forthcoming webinar, Organizational Learning: ?Reimagined and Redefined for our time, the first in a series of four webinars looking at key elements of organizational learning.

?

In the webinar we will explore:

?

  • A model of learning that creates a healthy workplace based on core values and acceptable behaviours
  • The role of field work in understanding underlying problems
  • How to/why to enable staff to work together on their own learning and challenges, working together in loose groups to achieve this
  • How to encourage knowledge to be shared, not hoarded, and how to create intense networking in order to make this a reality
  • How to/ Create an organizational culture in which blame is substituted by learning opportunity.

?

Sign up to the webinar here.

?

Picture credit: RF._.studio

?

Michael Page

Self taught practitioner of SmartarsseryTM & curiosity for better / Award winning nurse innovator, educator/ Cofounder of global human rights movement Open the Doors 2030 / Cohost With All Due Respect podcast.

1 年

Will there be a recording? Past my bedtime in Adelaide ??

回复
Jon Ingham

Director of the Strategic HR Academy. Experienced, professional HR&OD consultant. Analyst, trainer & keynote speaker. Author of The Social Organization. I can help you innovate and increase impact from HR.

1 年

Interesting. I'm a strong proponent of networks (a major topic in 'The Social Organization'). And I'd also suggest it's poorly designed hierarchies that get in the way - the type that are rigid and which assume that those at the top are mostly all-knowing and all-seeing. Fortunately, I don't personally believe most are like this. That doesn't detract from the value of networks, just that we should also ensure hierarchies - ie functions and other specialist groups - are working and enabling cross-functional learning effectively too.

回复
Eszter Mészáros

Director of Learning Experience Design

1 年

So excited for this Dr. Nigel Paine ??

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dr. Nigel Paine的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了