For organisations seeking to transform through data, how adopting a more holistic approach could accelerate progress and increase success rates
Alan Lowthorpe
Co-founder Adaptive Data | Former GM of Advanced Analytics, Wesfarmers Group | Unlocks & Accelerates Strategic Potential of Data and AI | Business-Led Data Driven Transformation
Despite significant investment in data capabilities and technologies, enterprise-wide adoption in the use of data and advanced analytics is still sparce. A recent survey of Fortune 1000 organisations[1] indicated that whilst 92% of organisations have measurable business impact from data and analytics investments, only 24% described the organisation as data driven.?In the same survey, 80% cited organisational and cultural barriers as the key challenges yet business awareness of the importance of data as a strategic priority and growth opportunity has never been higher.
So what could be behind the disjoint between organisation’s ambition and belief in the transformational potential of data versus the reality of scaled adoption and use?
1.?Being overly ambitious and tied to a detailed roadmap to secure business sponsorship and support
A recent HBR article on the struggles organisations face in achieving successful digital transformations[2] highlighted one cause of failure as being over-optimistic in expectations of timings and scope of the outcomes.
Data and analytics teams need to create enthusiasm and belief in the transformational impact of data to secure the attention and prioritisation of resources. The creation of a detailed benefits case and roadmap of the use cases to be delivered is often used to provide the desired clarity and justificaiton. Yet at the outset, often too few of the challenges and barriers that will need to be navigated are sufficiently understood. As a result, as the project progresses, the realisation gradually dawns that the initiative will require significantly more time and money to solve than initially communicated, if it succeeds at all.
The challenge is therefore how to secures engagement, focus and momentum without becoming beholden to a detailed roadmap of use case delivery, benefit realisation etc that in reality maybe little more than a comfort blanket.
2.?Focusing on getting to a proof of value pilot rather than solving the problem end to end
In an eagerness to get to an early proof point of success and validate the analytical approach, the typical focus of the analytics squad is about getting to a pilot or MVP of the model solution.
While this is a critical step in both building momentum through proving value and developing knowledge on the analytical solution, it often leads to a lack of focus on what is required to put the solution in to production.
The result is that the organisational enthusiasm and confidence created through the pilot value is then quickly dissipated and credibility undermined as the time, resource and investment required to deliver a productionised solution is slowly discovered and has to be resolved.
3.?Believing the evidence of a successful pilot outcome will be enough in itself to secure scaled adoption.
The enterprise use and adoption of data means that stakeholders often need to adapt existing capabilities and processes, and even fundamentally challenging how the organisation makes decisions or delivers its processes.
A factor here is that business leaders at all levels have got to their current positions by making sound experience-based judgements and decisions. So, when the outcome of an analytics initiative brings facts and recommendations which challenge and threaten to change the perceived wisdom of business leaders, it’s unsurprising when there is resistance or delay in adoption.
This challenge to the underlying experience and capability of decision makers can mean that even the most enlightened leaders will need to take the time to query and understand this new wisdom before adopting and embracing. So finding the bandwidth to understand an analysis that is often not simple to articulate and confronts long held experiences and belief can be a step to far. At worst, stakeholders may seek to actively deprioritise or undermine the outcome as they feel unable to adapt or face into a potential threat to what has made them successful to date.
With these challenges, increasingly the business value potential and sophistication of technology platforms and data science teams is beyond the ability of the organisation to absorb, deploy and scale. So what can data teams and organisations do differently to accelerate the transformational impact form data?
领英推荐
1.?Frame business needs and use cases as hypothesis-based backlog of "problems to be solved" rather than defined solution outcomes with benefit commitments and milestone roadmap.
?2.?Scope and structure the initiative as a problem to be solved from an end-to-end perspective, not just getting to a proof of value pilot.
3.?Proactively help decision makers adapt to how data and advanced analytics can fundamentally improve their capabilities and success.
The transformation of organisations through data is by definition a complex and involved change process, and success is certainly far from guaranteed. Yet unless analytics teams lead their organisations in taking a more holistic, considered and realistic approach then the potential of advanced analytics and AI will continue to be far beyond most organisations ability to absorb and embrace.
[1] https://www.wavestone.us/insights/data-and-analytics-leadership-annual-executive-survey-2023/
[2] https://hbr.org/2022/09/3-stages-of-a-successful-digital-transformation
[3] https://www.imd.org/ibyimd/strategy/six-ways-to-engage-with-your-teams-to-frame-and-solve-strategic-problems/
[4] https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/agile-funding-an-investment-management-approach-to-funding-outcomes
Executive, Product at Quantium
2 年Couldn’t agree more, Alan! Great article. Often there are some business-wide challenges with how use cases are funded that leads to this type of behaviour. For example, if you can’t size the costs and benefits up front, the funding doesn’t get released - leading to attempts to define a solution way too early before a problem has really been validated; also leading to behaviours whereby teams are not incentivised to “fail fast” and discard unviable ideas because they will lose the funding along with it. At the same time, businesses are impatient and often lose interest in continuing to invest if value is not demonstrated early and frequently. One way to break the impasse is to separate out “quick wins” from the product roadmap: allow the analytics teams to get ahead with proofs of value, to sustain business momentum, while the product team is given space (and a steady stream of funds to reinvest from the quick wins stream) to conduct proper solution discovery and build in those thin slices you mention. Crucially the product team must not be expected to “productise” the work of the quick wins stream, but to draw upon the insights they uncover and leverage the growing foundation of business buy-in
Founder and Director
2 年Well said