Organisational Ailments
Duena Blomstrom
Podcaster | Speaker | Founder | Media Personality | Influencer | Author | Loud &Frank AuADHD Authentic Tech Leader | People Not Tech and “Zero Human & Tech Debt” Creator | “NeuroSpicy+” Social Activist and Entrepreneur
We don’t normally discuss things at an organisational or cultural level as we’re instead, big believers in actionable change and that can only happen at team dynamic level, but we see a lot of companies that are -mercifully- discussing not only the need for Psychological Safety but also the topics of “resilience” and “engagement” these days. This is obviously welcomed and necessary, but we argue it isn’t enough and if it is done without a view of attacking some of the other systemic “human debt” we are missing a serious opportunity.
In this video we outline examples of some remaining big themes that need urgent attention for the first two to be seriously explored and for the explorers to remain competitive and performant across this coming period:
- Office Politics - a toxic environment in a group or organization where clique-behaviour, lack of collaboration and eventual resulting discrimination of all sorts breeds. This isn’t a physical manifestation and will not magically disappear simply because we are working from home or in a hybrid model;
- Lack of Purpose - Having a stated and upheld common goal at a team and company level is crucially important in particular at times like these. In our other episodes, we keep returning to team relaunches and one of their major purposes is the necessary periodic affirming and reaffirming of “why”. When it -insidiously- disappears, we see sharp drops in performance over time;
- Insufficient Trust - Remote work brings into focus the gaps in trust that we harbour towards our employees. In the absence of the physical act of presence, and before we execute on a serious effort of redefining outcomes-based-work, we are left in a land where employees work to burnout level and managers aren’t even sure they do. An intentional investment in trust and a recognition that professionals are adults who want to do a good job are necessary parts of the reframe;
- Open and Human Communication - Team leaders showing appreciation for extra hard work, team members being empathic and open, leaders asking open-hearted questions and leading an exploration of every topic - all of these signs of health and longevity should be intentionally and urgently brought into our work;
- Lack of Leadership Teams - in the absence of a real team at the top where leaders truly build together and rely on each other how are we to hope they are Psychologically Safe enough to be honest and innovative? And if they aren’t Psychologically Safe at the top is it any wonder they value it less down the line and that it affects the entire enterprise’s ability to succeed?
- No Big Reframe - Overall, the biggest issue is shying away from exploring huge themes to do with measuring, redefining and rewarding work once it has been re-defined outside of the convention, and that disallows companies from arriving at new, agile, un-human-debted and resilient new ways of being.
Counterintuitive as it seems for some, this is the time to dig deep and take the opportunity to crack open some of these heavy themes, then try and work on them now, while we regroup, while we reframe, while we rebuild.
————————————
Don't send your teams home with a laptop, a Jira and Slack account and a prayer!
LAST CHANCE BEFORE THE END OF AUGUST! Get in touch for our 2-months-license-free and Stay-Connected pack COVID-19 aid team solution for measuring and increasing Psychological Safety offer at www.psychologicalsafety.works/covid-19 or reach out at [email protected] and let's help your team before it ends.
Director, Partnerships and Channel Sales at Millennium Systems International
4 年Great article and great points!
president and project manager
4 年Thank you Duena Blomstrom for your support and hard working
Commercial UAV Solutions Engineer
4 年As a former soldier I see many leadership gurus in the business world starting to redefine leadership, and especially in these trying times. Through many thousands of years and in much more challenging times the armies of the world have evolved their leadership to a great product. Resilience training in the military is definitely something that the business world can adopt and somethiing which worked well for us soldiers and our families. As a soldier now trying to find my way in the business world I can see a lack of something very small but so much important in building trust, character and plain old guts. The lack of allowing people to fail. The business world is tough and brings with it different kinds of stress and anxiety. In the army we had exercises that are set up in such a way that you will fail. The aim of the exercise is to let people experience failure and to expose their latent leadership skills and problem solving skills but also to introduce them to failure and how to cope with the process and how to come back from that low point. Most important for me was to teach people when to recognise that they have failed and to take ownership of their mistakes or shortcoming. We had this saying: "Be tough on standards but soft on your people", which means that your followers should not fear you as their leader. They must have confidence in approaching you, especially with bad news and they must feel they can admit when they were wrong or made a mistake. They way I see it, if the business world can just stop passing the buck or playing the blame game as so many do (and this starts with top leaders) and make it safe for people to admit failure/ mistakes without getting fired then problems can be solved that much quicker. A sandbox type of scenario or role play where people can go through a simulated exercise of failing can teach people so much and will allow people to see the markers and maybe in future prevent going down the same road. We focus so much on succes and over analyse when things go right, that we forget we learn the most valuable lessons from of our failures. Maybe a failure simulation can help fix many of an organizations' ailments or at least expose them better? Thank you for a great article Duena Blomstrom