Optimism Against the End of Humans
Lukas Neckermann
Advisor and Board Member | Helping leaders, founders, and investors navigate the #MobilityRevolution | #SmartCities #SmartMobility | Teacher, Learner, Keynote Speaker (on 5 continents)
It’s time to stop worrying, accept, and work with the hands we’ve dealt ourselves. We may just find that by doing so, we’ll have more time and creative energy to build solutions for human life post climate-catastrophe (or even AI dominance).
Like so many of you, I've read countless articles and many books that could charitably be called "climate catastrophism". Words like "uninhabitable", "end", and "destruction" feature prominently. "Solution", "hope" and "plan" rarely do - and that is a problem for our children, and ourselves. Research suggests that until 2030 our collective anxiety about the climate catastrophe may be?as bad — for the economy, society, and the planet — as the issue itself.?
Should we all take out the recycling, turn down the heat, and fly less? Absolutely. Should we become vegans? It would be better if we did. Should we support those who glue themselves to streets to raise awareness for the coming climate apocalypse? Perhaps.
But we should also not fret about the unavoidable. At least two degrees of warming is all but certain at this point.
Reversing growth would be effective, but it’s socially, economically, and politically untenable. Carbon capture and sequestration, and some even more bold (untested)?moonshots?provide some hope. But our hope shouldn’t be tied to any one technology or measure. Our hope should be tied to the ingenuity of the human spirit, our collective resilience, and the creativity of the human mind to "get on with it" - even if it means rebuilding.
领英推荐
I've begun a series of articles entitled "Musings on the End of Humans" (tongue firmly in cheek) to address the positivity deficit in the discourse around #ClimateChange, #AI, #Bioengineering, and #War. The above is an excerpt from one of these articles.
I have written (or co-written) four books that address critical issues in automotive, transportation, smart cities, the future of work, and automation. While sometimes brutal in tone and consequence ("Three Zeroes"), they also tended to provide a positive perspective and potential solutions: for the affected industries, investors, fleet managers, cities, and startups. I've also actively worked with more than a dozen startups on operationalising solutions - rather than lament on the problems.
By no means do I intend to discount the severity of some of our crises. But I feel we need to moderate discussion, bend away from catastrophism, and shift our focus toward optimism and solutions.
Please feel free to follow me on Medium as well; I'll cross-post to LinkedIn and to Neckermann.net. Thank you to Axel Brohm , Steven Wood , and Manoj Pradhan who have provided initial comments on these articles.
Advisor and Board Member | Helping leaders, founders, and investors navigate the #MobilityRevolution | #SmartCities #SmartMobility | Teacher, Learner, Keynote Speaker (on 5 continents)
1 年This article about Charleston in The Guardian (link below) speaks about the gradual abandonment of low-lying areas, and the necessary migration that can (and will) occur. First we’ll migrate within cities, then from one city to another, and ultimately, from country to country (as we have seen already). Unavoidable at this point, so let’s deal with it. “Imagine planning for a multi-decade, gradual move, in consultation with each community, to new and welcoming locations well-connected to transit and jobs. Imagine caring for the least well-off among us, ensuring that they have a voice in this planning and choices about whether, when and how to leave, while firmly setting an endpoint on human habitation in the riskiest places.” https://apple.news/AK6B1sAufRoGMZkZyk6Ongg
Empowering Electric Innovation since 2008. Pioneering Sustainable Alternatives to Industrial Animal Agriculture since 2019. Continuously discovering, embracing, and implementing climate technology. Let’s engage.
1 年totally agree. we are now here and we need to adjust together with compassion and empathy: keep on with a smile. it will be a tough adjustment process, indeed.
Psychometrics
1 年Here is the fundamental problem with your approach. Climate scientists have had to de-alarm their reports for years in order to get them published. People. Aren’t. Listening. If calm “we have time” arguments worked they would have done so for decades. They do not. Your “alarmist” is my “finally telling the whole story.” Maybe people should be scared. Maybe human nature simply ignores anything that isn’t explosive and an imminent threat. Civil rights didn’t happen because of MLK. It needed Malcolm X and since then little has changed without energetic struggle. If people listened 10, 20, 30 or more years ago things might be different now. Without the stick, the carrot simply breaks. Humanity cannot placate and Neville Chamberlain our way out this time.
Climate, ecology & public policy focused. Independent Writing & Editing Professional (open to ghostwriting for environmental non-profits)
1 年We should be urging our governments to declare formal climate emergencies in order to more efficiently, prevent / prepare / mitigate re further climate disruption, and to transition. We are in an epic struggle against the oil and gas industry, which will not go quietly into the night. Mere intellectualism will not win these battles. Sometimes one has to get into their status-quo-luvin faces, and YELL. See, https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/biden-climate-emergency-bold-actions/ #justStopOil #climateemergency
Climate, ecology & public policy focused. Independent Writing & Editing Professional (open to ghostwriting for environmental non-profits)
1 年If you don't mind, I'm going to go on sounding the alarm. You guys can encourage calmer (ie, slower) progress if you like.