Optimising Breathing Behaviour for Enhanced SOF Operator Performance

Special Operations Forces (SOF) operators face uniquely demanding roles that require them to perform complex tasks in challenging environments under extreme physical and mental stress. These conditions, compounded by rigorous training necessary for operational readiness, can lead to fatigue, cognitive errors, and burnout (O’Hara et al, 2022). Underpinning these stressors is various factors dictated by the unique and individualised histories of each SOF Operator which can lead to changes in breathing behaviours and patterns. Dysfunctional breathing can compromise the body's chemical balance, impacting key physiological systems and leading to:

• Reduced physical endurance.
• Impaired cognitive functions like decision-making and memory.
• Increased stress-related health risks.

Human Performance Optimisation for SOF Operators

The latest research on shooting performance among SOF operators highlights the significance of various determinants, including stress management, physical fitness, and experience. Research by Buskerud, Abrahamsen and Solberg (2022) on Norwegian Special Forces operators emphasised the importance of real-life experience (deployments) and rigorous training in enhancing shooting performance under physical stress. Additionally, a methodology paper outlined the physical key components for mission success in SOF operations, including aerobic endurance, anaerobic fitness, strength, coordination, and reaction speed (Pattyn et al, 2022). Another study aimed to determine the differences in stress shoot performance among ARSOF operators who participate in a human performance programme, emphasising the significance of such programmes in enhancing shooting performance (Canada et al, 2018). Overall, the research underscores the holistic approach to human performance in SOF operations, encompassing stress management, physical fitness, and specific training programmes.

The Role of Breathing in Human Performance

Breathing serves dual roles, both physiological and mechanical, which are essential for optimising performance and facilitating recovery. Physiologically, breathing regulates energy production through efficient gas exchange and maintains blood pH homeostasis. Maintaining a stable chemical axis is vital to health and performance and crucial for sustaining physical endurance and cognitive function under stress. Mechanically, breathing contributes to postural control by modulating forces during both low and high mechanical load activities. Research consistently highlights the critical role of breathing in various aspects of human performance:

• Controlled breathing lowers stress responses, helping individuals maintain composure under pressure. A meta-analysis found that breathwork interventions were associated with lower levels of self-reported stress compared to control conditions (Fincham et al, 2023).
• Respiratory patterns directly influence attention, memory, and decision-making accuracy. Research has demonstrated that breathing frequency interventions can direct attention away from emotional stimuli to one's breath, potentially enhancing the interventions' effects on emotions and cognitive performance. This suggests that controlled breathing patterns can influence attention allocation (Buchanan and Janelle, 2022).
• Physical enhancement – Illi et al.'s 2012 systematic review and meta-analysis provides strong evidence for the positive effects of respiratory muscle training (RMT) on exercise performance in healthy individuals.

The Science Behind Breathing Interventions

Recent advancements in applied breathing science provide actionable solutions for optimising human performance:

• Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback – Techniques such as resonance frequency breathing improve autonomic nervous system balance, leading to better stress management and resilience. Studies show RFB can increase heart rate variability, enhance focus, and improve emotional regulation (Lehrer et al, 2020).
• Breathing Behavioural Analysis and Modification – An approach to understanding and improving breathing patterns based on the principles of behavioural psychology. This method recognises breathing as a behaviour that can be learned, analysed, and modified to enhance health and performance (Litchfield and Reamer, 2022).
• Cardio-Respiratory Fitness (CRF) Assessments – CRF assessments are essential tools for evaluating an individual's cardiovascular and respiratory capacity during physical activity. These assessments provide valuable information about overall health and fitness levels. Meta-analyses consistently demonstrate the importance of CRF assessments in predicting health outcomes and mortality risk in healthy individuals.
• Autogenic-feedback training (AFT) is a training method that encompasses self-regulatory techniques such as biofeedback and autogenic therapy, allowing individuals to voluntarily control multiple physiological responses. NASA has researched the effectiveness of AFT in the context of space travel, demonstrating its benefits for controlling motion sickness symptoms and as a countermeasure for space adaptation syndrome (Cowings et al, 2018). This highlights its potential in extreme environments, making it relevant to SOF operators.

Wearable Technology in Performance Enhancement

The integration of wearable technology in performance enhancement offers significant opportunities for optimising physiological and cognitive functions in high-stress environments. Devices such as heart rate monitors, wearable capnography systems, and biofeedback sensors provide real-time data on vital metrics, enabling operators to gain insights into their physiological states and adjust their behaviors accordingly. This technology facilitates the continuous monitoring of breathing patterns, heart rate variability, and other critical parameters, allowing for timely interventions that can improve stress management and overall performance. By leveraging data analytics and personalised feedback, wearable technology coupled with coaching empowers operators to self-regulate their physiological responses, enhancing their ability to maintain focus, endurance, and recovery during both training and operational scenarios. As these technologies continue to evolve, their applications can significantly contribute to the resilience and effectiveness of SOF operators in demanding conditions.

Return on Investment

Breathing interventions are low-cost and minimally invasive, offering high returns. Research has found them to be highly effective for increasing performance:

• +11% average overall improvement in performance (Illi et al, 2012);
• +21% improvement in constant load tests (Illi et al, 2012);
• +17% increase in time to fatigue for swimming (Shei et al, 2016);
• -29% decrease in post-exercise lactate for fin swimming performance in divers (Lindholm et al, 2007);
• +20% increase in time to exhaustion running with thoracic load in recruits (Shei et al, 2018); and
• +30% Special Forces Selection Course pass rate compared to prior years (Bausek, Summers and Sonnon, 2019).

These statistically significant improvements show the potential for breathing optimisation to enhance not just physical endurance but mental resilience and performance.

Implementing Breathing Training – Scalability and Accessibility

Breathing interventions offer a scalable, cost-effective solution for SOF units. Their simplicity allows them to be integrated easily into existing training schedules without requiring extensive resources. Training can be conducted by non-healthcare personnel, with minimal equipment and time commitment. Moreover, real-time feedback empowers operators to take ownership of their breathing performance and track their progress independently.

Future Research Opportunities

While there is substantial research on the physiological and psychological impacts of controlled breathing techniques, studies specifically targeting SOF operators are less common. This presents a significant opportunity for future research to explore the intersection of breathing science and SOF performance. Key areas for investigation include:

• OPSEC – Developing research methodologies that respect the sensitive nature of SOF operations while gathering valuable insights.
• Specialised Nature of SOF Roles – Tailoring studies to address the unique requirements and conditions faced by SOF operators, ensuring that findings are directly applicable.
• Emerging Field – Expanding the application of breathing science in tactical environments to better understand its potential benefits and limitations.
• Resource Allocation – Encouraging collaboration between military institutions, government organisations and academic researchers to prioritise human performance optimisation.

By addressing these research gaps, we can better understand how targeted breathing interventions can be optimised for SOF operators, ultimately enhancing their performance and resilience.

Conclusion

The demanding nature of SOF operations requires innovative approaches to human performance. Breathing science, supported by extensive research, offers a proven pathway to optimise both mental and physical readiness. Optimising breathing behaviours represents a transformative opportunity for enhancing the performance, resilience, and overall well-being of SOF operators. Breathing is a foundational yet often overlooked aspect of human performance, with profound effects on physical endurance, cognitive function, and stress resilience. The integration of controlled breathing techniques, supported by wearable technology and biofeedback systems, offers a scalable, cost-effective, and minimally invasive solution tailored to the unique demands of SOF operations.

The evidence presented in this white paper highlights the potential of breathing interventions to deliver measurable improvements in performance metrics, including endurance, decision-making accuracy, and recovery. The substantial return on investment underscores the value of implementing these interventions across SOF training and operational frameworks. Furthermore, future research opportunities offer exciting avenues for advancing the application of breathing science in tactical environments, ensuring that interventions remain effective, adaptable, and aligned with the specific needs of SOF operators.

By prioritising breathing optimisation within human performance programs, military organisations can enhance mission success rates, mitigate the risks of burnout, and support the long-term health of their operators. Breathing is not merely a physiological process but a strategic asset in achieving operational excellence.

References

Bausek, N., Summers, S. and Sonnon, S. (2019) 'Respiratory intervention techniques increase selection rate for special forces',?bioRxiv. Available at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/774620v1?(Accessed: 21 November 2024).

Buchanan, T.L. and Janelle, C.M. (2022) 'Emotions and ensuing motor performance are altered by regulating breathing frequency: Implications for emotion regulation and sport performance',?Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p. 963711. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963711.

Buskerud, J.E., Abrahamsen, F.E. and Solberg, P.A. (2022) 'Physical stress and determinants of shooting performance among Norwegian Special Forces operators',?Frontiers in Psychology, 13, p. 894169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894169.

Canada, D., Dawes, J., Lindsay, K., Elder, C., Goldberg, P., Bartley, N., Werth, K., Bricker, D. and Fischer, T. (2018) 'Differences in stress shoot performance among special forces operators who participate in a human performance program vs those who do not',?Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 18, pp. 64–68. doi: 10.55460/I508-07U6.

Cowings, P.S., Toscano, W.B., Reschke, M.F. and Tsehay, A. (2018) 'Psychophysiological assessment and correction of spatial disorientation during simulated Orion spacecraft re-entry',?International Journal of Psychophysiology, 131, pp. 102–112.

Fincham, G.W., Strauss, C., Montero-Marin, J. et al. (2023) 'Effect of breathwork on stress and mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials',?Scientific Reports, 13, p. 432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27247-y.

Illi, S.K., Held, U., Frank, I. and Spengler, C.M. (2012) 'Effect of respiratory muscle training on exercise performance in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis',?Sports Medicine, 42(8), pp. 707–724. doi: 10.1007/BF03262290.

Lehrer, P., Kaur, K., Sharma, A., Shah, K., Huseby, R., Bhavsar, J. and Zhang, Y. (2020) 'Heart rate variability biofeedback improves emotional and physical health and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis',?Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 45, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09466-z.

Lindholm, P., Wylegala, J., Pendergast, D.R. and Lundgren, C.E.G. (2007) 'Resistive respiratory muscle training improves and maintains endurance swimming performance in divers',?Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, 34, pp. 169–180.

Litchfield, P. (2022) 'Editorial',?Journal of Holistic Medicine, BHMA.

Litchfield, P.M. (2010) 'CapnoLearning: respiratory fitness and acid-base regulation',?Psychophysiology Today, 7(1).

O’Hara, R., Sussman, L.R., Tiede, J.M., Sheehan, R. and Keizer, B. (2022) 'Physiological and psychological stressors affecting performance, health, and recovery in Special Forces operators: Challenges and solutions. A scoping review',?Journal of Special Operations Medicine, 22(2), pp. 139–148. doi: 10.55460/904J-601A.

Pattyn, N., De Pauw, K., Meeusen, R. and Roelands, B. (2022) 'Lessons from special forces operators for elite teams sports training: How to make the whole greater than the sum of the parts',?Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, p. 780767. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.780767.

Shei, R.-J., Chapman, R.F., Gruber, A.H. and Mickleborough, T.D. (2018) 'Inspiratory muscle training improves exercise capacity with thoracic load carriage',?Physiological Reports, 6(10). doi: 10.14814/phy2.13558.

Shei, R.J., Lindley, M., Chatham, K. and Mickleborough, T.D. (2016) 'Effect of flow-resistive inspiratory loading on pulmonary and respiratory muscle function in sub-elite swimmers',?Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 56(4), pp. 392–398.