Opinion! Policy to Ban ASM Operations- A Fallacy of secondary effects

The ongoing campaign to ban artisanal and small-scale mining (#asm) activities in Zimbabwe, South Africa and Ghana is primarily motivated by significant environmental and social concerns. Environmentally, #asm contributes to deforestation, water pollution through toxic chemicals like mercury, and soil degradation, all of which threaten local ecosystems and the health of communities relying on these resources. Socially, the industry is often linked to hazardous working conditions, child labor, and community conflicts over resource competition. While the intention behind the ban is to protect the environment and vulnerable populations, it raises critical legal considerations regarding enforcement and the livelihoods of those who depend on #asm for income. A more effective strategy may involve regulating #asm practices to promote sustainability while ensuring that miners have access to safe working conditions and viable economic alternatives. This balanced approach could foster both environmental protection and social equity, addressing the root causes of the issues at hand. The policies aimed at banning #asm operations may not produce the desired outcomes that governments hope for, highlighting a fallacy related to the secondary effects of such a ban.

Fallacy of secondary effects... "???????? ???? ?????? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???? ?????? ???? ?????? ???????? ?????? ?????????????????? ?????????????? ???? ?? ?????????? ????????????, ???? ?????? ?????????????? ???????? ???? ?? ?????????????? ??????????, ?????? ???? ?????????????? ???? ?????????????? ???????? ?????? ????????-?????? ?????????????? ???? ???????? ???????????? ???????? ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ???????? ?????????????? ?????????? ?????? ???? ?????? ????????????. ???? ???? ?????? ?????????????? ???? ?????????????????????? ?????????????????? ????????????????????????."

Banning #asm activities often exemplifies the ?????????????? ???? ?????????????????? ??????????????, where policymakers focus solely on immediate consequences while neglecting long-term implications. This approach can lead to unintended negative outcomes that affect not just the targeted groups but the broader community. Let me bring context- Many nations, such as South Africa, are struggling to effectively regulate and formalize #asm operations. South Africa has developed an #asm policy in an attempt to regulate the sector. Zimbabwe on the other hand is developing the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill. The bill is proposing recognition of small scale mining operations with no discussion on artisanal mining rights. In contrast, Ghana has successfully legalized its small-scale mining sector through various legal frameworks. The country is so advanced in this area compared to its African counterparts that it has not only established regulations. This recognition highlights recognition of the contribution of small scale mining operations. In the same line, the small scale mining operations in Ghana are divided into formal and formal- loosely into legal and illegal operations. The Illegal small scale operations are referred as Galamsey.

Significance of #asm operations - Ghana

Galamsey has become a significant issue with far-reaching implications for both the economy and the environment. Estimates suggest that between 20,000 and 50,000 individuals are directly engaged in galamsey activities. However, some reports indicate that around 200,000 people may be involved in various capacities related to these operations. Even more striking is the estimate that nearly 3 million Ghanaians depend on galamsey for their livelihoods, underscoring its critical role in local economies. The practice is primarily concentrated in southern Ghana, where substantial gold deposits are found. This geographic concentration has led to the establishment of numerous informal mining sites, often operated without the necessary permits or regulations. While galamsey provides income for many, it also poses significant risks to those involved.?

Why Banning #asm activities

The primary justification for banning #asm typically revolves around environmental concerns and illegal mining activities. For instance, in Ghana, calls for an absolute ban on small-scale mining (often referred to as "galamsey") have been driven by the detrimental impact on water quality due to increased turbidity from mining operations. Similarly, in Zimbabwe, a ban on mining in river lines and protected areas has been proposed to safeguard national parks from ecological degradation. However attempts to ban #as operations in Ghana dates back to 2017. Many nations, such as South Africa, are struggling to effectively regulate and formalize artisanal and small-scale mining. In contrast, Ghana has successfully legalized its small-scale mining sector through various legal frameworks. The country is so advanced in this area compared to its African counterparts that it has not only established regulations.

Immediate Consequences of the Ban

However, this focus on immediate issues overlooks the long-term socio-economic impacts. Many individuals engaged in #asm rely on it for their livelihoods. A blanket ban can lead to increased unemployment, poverty, and social unrest among communities that depend on these activities for economic survival. In Ghana, Martin Kwaku Ayisi highlighted the need to have a distinction between illegal and legal small scale mining operations.

A comprehensive ban would adversely affect licensed operators who adhere to regulations,

This suggest that regulation rather than prohibition is a more effective approach.

Secondary Effects of Banning #asm

1. ???????????????? ????????????????????????: Banning #asm can displace thousands of miners and their families, pushing them into informal economies or illegal mining activities, which may exacerbate the very issues the ban aimed to address. In Zimbabwe, for instance, the government's crackdown on illegal mining has not only failed to eliminate these activities but has also led to a surge in violence and chaos within the sector. Displaced miners, unable to find legitimate work due to the ban, often turn to illegal mining as a means of survival. This shift increases competition for resources and can lead to violent confrontations among rival groups vying for control over lucrative mining sites. The involvement of armed gangs has further destabilized communities, making it increasingly dangerous for miners and their families. Similarly, in South Africa, the ban on ASM has driven many miners underground, both literally and figuratively. As legal avenues for small-scale mining diminish, many individuals resort to illegal operations that are often poorly regulated and hazardous. This not only perpetuates environmental degradation but also undermines community safety and health. The cycle of displacement into informal economies can lead to increased poverty levels as miners struggle to make ends meet without access to formal employment opportunities. Moreover, the economic consequences extend beyond individual miners. Entire communities that rely on ASM for their livelihoods face increased poverty and instability when bans are enforced without adequate support systems or alternative income-generating opportunities. Families may find themselves trapped in a cycle of poverty as they are forced to engage in illegal activities that offer little security or long-term sustainability.

2. ?????????????????? ?????????????? ????????????: A prohibition may inadvertently encourage illegal mining as displaced miners seek alternative means of income. This can lead to more environmental degradation and less oversight over mining practices. This is not the first time Ghana has attempted the ban of small scale mining operation. In 2017 an ban on the operation was proposed. The ban on small-scale mining operations in Ghana, initiated in December 2017, has proven to be largely ineffective. Originally intended as a six-month measure to curb illegal mining activities, the ban has since been extended twice—first for three months and then indefinitely—pending the completion of an auditing process and subsequent cabinet approval for lifting it. Despite these efforts, illegal mining activities have persisted, driven by factors such as bureaucratic inefficiencies in the formalization of small-scale mining operations and a lack of sustainable livelihood alternatives for those involved in ASM. Reports indicate that approximately 85% of small-scale miners continue to operate without licenses, highlighting the challenges in regulating the sector effectively. The government's inability to enforce the ban consistently has led to ongoing environmental degradation and social unrest in mining communities, demonstrating that prohibitive measures alone are insufficient to address the complexities surrounding #asm in Ghana.

The ban on small-scale mining operations in Zimbabwe and South Africa has inadvertently fueled illegal activities rather than curbing them. In Zimbabwe, the government imposed a ban on illegal mining activities in response to rising violence and chaos within the sector, particularly after a police officer was killed during a confrontation with armed gangs. This crackdown has led to increased violence, with machete-wielding gangs exploiting the power vacuum created by the ban, resulting in conflicts over mining sites and further destabilizing local communities. The Zimbabwe Republic Police's efforts to regulate the sector have been complicated by allegations of corruption, with reports of police and military officers being involved in illegal mining themselves, undermining trust in law enforcement and exacerbating the situation. Similarly, in South Africa, while artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) is recognized as a significant economic activity, the illegality surrounding it makes regulation challenging. The term "Zama-Zama" refers to illegal miners who often operate with more sophisticated equipment than typical artisanal miners. The ban on ASM has not only failed to eliminate illegal operations but has also led to substantial gold smuggling—estimated at R7 billion annually—out of the country to neighboring markets. As a result, the lack of legal avenues for small-scale miners has driven many into the shadows, perpetuating cycles of violence, environmental degradation, and social unrest. The ongoing challenges highlight that prohibitive measures alone are insufficient; instead, there is a pressing need for comprehensive policies that promote legal frameworks for ASM while addressing the underlying socio-economic factors driving illegal mining activities in both Zimbabwe and South Africa.

3. ????????u???????? ??????????????????????: The loss of income from #asm can destabilize communities, leading to increased crime rates and social tensions as individuals struggle to make ends meet. In Zimbabwe, the government's crackdown on illegal mining has resulted in heightened violence and chaos within ASM communities. As miners lose their primary source of income, they may turn to alternative means of survival, including illegal mining or other criminal activities. Reports indicate that the absence of legitimate economic opportunities has led to the rise of machete-wielding gangs that exploit the desperation of displaced miners, resulting in violent confrontations over mining sites. This escalation in violence not only threatens individual safety but also destabilizes entire communities, as fear and mistrust permeate local relationships.

Similarly, in South Africa, the ban on ASM has driven many miners underground, leading to increased competition for resources among illegal operators. This competition can result in violent disputes and a rise in organized crime, as gangs vie for control over lucrative mining areas. The social fabric of communities becomes strained as individuals who once worked together now find themselves at odds, driven by desperation and a lack of economic stability.The impact of these bans extends beyond immediate economic concerns; they also foster social tensions that can lead to broader community instability. Families facing financial hardship may experience increased stress and conflict, leading to higher rates of domestic violence and substance abuse. Additionally, youth in these communities may become disillusioned and engage in criminal activities as they seek quick financial gains in the absence of legitimate employment opportunities. Moreover, the erosion of trust between community members can have long-lasting effects on social cohesion. When individuals are pushed into illegal activities out of necessity, it creates an environment where crime becomes normalized, further entrenching cycles of poverty and instability. As communities grapple with these challenges, the potential for collaboration and collective action diminishes, making it increasingly difficult to address underlying issues related to poverty and resource management.

4. ?????????????????????? ?????????? ????????????????????: Legal miners who comply with regulations may find themselves at a disadvantage compared to illegal operators who continue unregulated practices. This undermines efforts to promote responsible mining practices. The existence of illegal mining activities significantly undermines legal operations within the ASM sector. Legal miners face heightened challenges due to competition from unregulated practices that allow illegal operators to thrive without adhering to essential regulations. This situation not only jeopardizes the economic stability of compliant miners but also poses broader environmental and social risks that can destabilize communities and hinder sustainable development efforts in the mining sector. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach that includes stronger enforcement of existing laws, support for legal miners through financial incentives or subsidies, and initiatives aimed at formalizing ASM practices to create a more equitable and sustainable mining landscape.

5. ???????? o?? ?????????? ?????????????????? ?????? ??????????????????: Artisanal miners often possess valuable local knowledge about sustainable practices and biodiversity conservation. Banning artisanal and small-scale mining not only threatens the livelihoods of those involved but also results in a significant loss of local knowledge crucial for sustainable resource management. This loss can undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity and maintain ecological balance, ultimately jeopardizing both environmental health and community well-being. To mitigate these risks, it is essential for policymakers to recognize the value of local knowledge and incorporate it into sustainable development strategies that support ASM rather than prohibit it outright. By fostering an inclusive approach that values traditional practices alongside modern regulations, communities can better manage their resources while preserving their cultural heritage and ecological integrity.

????????????????????

The fallacy of secondary effects underscores the need for policymakers to adopt a more nuanced approach when considering bans on ASM activities. Instead of outright prohibitions, governments should focus on ???????????????????? and ???????????????????? small-scale miners through legal frameworks that promote sustainable practices while addressing environmental concerns. By doing so, they can mitigate immediate issues without incurring long-term negative consequences that affect broader societal stability and economic health.