Operational Excellence Can Kill
The meeting with the executive committee isn’t going to be easy—for yet another year, the company’s innovation efforts have yielded only lackluster growth. The head of the core business, which has been in a long, slow decline, will undoubtedly challenge you again:
I appreciate the efforts of our Head of Innovation, but there’s a significant gap between the goals of our innovation program and the reality of its achievements. Perhaps we’re over-investing in innovation. I could drive incremental growth in the core business if we redirected a little of the funding.
Maybe this time, his words will have more impact—you need a real innovation success.
A few years ago, it all started so well—idea fairs, lots of new projects, and bold ideas. The executive commitment to renewal and growth through innovation drove excitement across the organization. But somehow, things haven’t lived up to their promise. While many efforts have delivered results, most big ideas seem to have produced only meager returns. And the boldest projects seem perpetually struggling and often underfunded. You’ve heard whispers of “innovation theater” a few times in the halls. Confidence among the ranks is waning.
领英推荐
This nightmare scenario occurs all too frequently across the corporate landscape, and its causes are usually misdiagnosed. My diagnosis recognizes a paradox:?lackluster growth from innovation is often an unintended consequence of otherwise good business processes built on operational excellence. As a practitioner of innovation and portfolio management for thirty years, this paradox is one of my top surprising lessons:?operational excellence can kill.
The cure isn’t a bold new innovation initiative or anything like that. Instead, the remedy is first the recognition of these unintended consequences and then unwinding them. It starts by taking a strategic perspective on the growth portfolio and having a strategic forum focused on making choices about where and how much to invest.
Senior Advisor Economic and Workforce Development
3 年This is a great piece, David. It captures many lessons learned and resonates with my 40+ adjacent projects. The biggest one you mentioned from my experience is lowered expectations. The logical approach to "de-risking" a growth opportunity actually adds risk because it becomes ho-hum, and it still requires a great deal of work.
Interim Head - Quality, Safety, Environment & Corporate Social Responsibility Department at HM.CLAUSE
3 年This is an Excellent article David Matheson I highly recommend this article for anyone leading Innovation and serious about building a strong innovation culture. Moving from “Operational Portfolio Management” to “Strategic Portfolio Management” is no easy journey; it requires a strong commitment and vision. In addition to your suggestions, leaders must foster a culture of risk raking and entrepreneurialism to overcome the unintended consequences that can kill innovation and growth.
Associate @ SmartOrg
3 年Interesting article
Global Segment Director at DuPont
3 年This is a Great article. Thanks for sharing David!