Opening remarks following the meeting of the European Council of 21 March 2024

Opening remarks following the meeting of the European Council of 21 March 2024

Let me start with Ukraine and the consequences of Russia's war of aggression. We continue very clearly to stand by Ukraine, as we have pledged. Our EUR 4.5 billion payment this week is the first from the Ukraine Fund and further proof of this resolve. I want to focus on three topics that we discussed today.

The first is that we must continue to support Ukraine's efforts to fight back on the battlefield. So I am glad that Leaders endorsed our proposal to use the extraordinary revenues from immobilised Russian assets. This will provide funding for military equipment to Ukraine. We can expect to collect around EUR 3 billion for 2024 and similar amounts in the future years. And I am very grateful to Czechia for its initiative to provide 800,000 shells to Ukraine, with its partners. The funding could also go to this initiative.

My second point is completely different. It is on Russian grain. We have prepared a proposal to increase tariffs on Russian and Belarusian imports of cereals, oil seeds and derived products. And there are several good reasons for making this proposal. It will prevent Russian grain from destabilising the EU market in these products. It will stop Russia from using the revenues from the export of these goods to the European Union. And it will ensure that illegal Russian exports of stolen Ukrainian grain do not enter the EU market.

My third topic is on our own defence. Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine has also given us a new awareness and a new responsibility. In reaction, Member States have already spent EUR 100 billion more on defence, and that is good. But we have to strengthen Europe's defence industrial base. The fragmentation of the European defence market has hindered us from capitalising on our Single Market offers. We do not only need to spend more, we need to spend better and we need to spend European. This is what our European Industrial Defence Strategy that the Commission tabled two weeks ago is all about. It was welcomed by the Leaders to ramp up production, to bridge capability gaps and to spend better together by cooperating on projects and procuring more, together. The benefits of implementing the Strategy are very clear. It can improve the interoperability of our armed forces. We can also have a real return on investments right here in Europe – that is good jobs here in Europe. And finally, European SMEs and mid-caps that are active in the defence sector can grow and access new markets.

In addition, we need to strengthen our general preparedness. Finland is a leader in that, and we have a lot to learn from them. And therefore, I am happy that the former President, Sauli Niinist?, will write a report on the way forward in this area. This report will be drafted in close cooperation with the HR/VP and with the Member States. That was on Ukraine.

Let me now turn to enlargement. I welcome the Leaders' historic decision to open accession negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina. The country has taken impressive steps towards our Union. More progress has been achieved in just over a year than in over a decade. Bosnia and Herzegovina is now fully aligned with our Foreign and Security Policy. We have also seen sustained progress on the adoption of important laws. We have seen progress on migration management, and Bosnia and Herzegovina has made great strides on dialogue and reconciliation. So I hope that the decision of today will lead to even more progress.

My final point concerns Gaza. The consensus of tonight is that we need an immediate humanitarian pause leading to a sustained ceasefire, the unconditional release of hostages and the provision of humanitarian assistance. Gaza is on the verge of famine – a catastrophic humanitarian situation. Full, rapid, safe and unhindered humanitarian access into Gaza via all routes is essential. 500 trucks or equivalent a day need to enter into Gaza on land, air and sea. The European Council specifically endorsed the maritime corridor from Cyprus to Gaza to deliver additional volumes. And we urge the Israeli government not to undertake a ground operation in Rafah. Finally, the European Council reiterated that we are firmly committed to a lasting and sustainable peace based on the two-state solution.

Thank you.

Manuel Iozzi

Quality means the customer returns, not the product

5 个月

Frau von der Leyen…….steht für Intransparenz und verschwundene SMS, gel?schte Handydaten und Blockade von Datenfreigabe, aktive Verhinderung von Transparenz…..riecht irgendwie nach Korruption…… Siehe ZDF Report: Gekaufte Politik, Europa in der Korruptionskriese.

回复
Sohan Kabra

IIM Ahmedabad Alumnus, IIT Roorkee | Sr. IT Executive | Fueling Growth, Igniting Innovation | Entrepreneur | Technologist | Lecturer | Humanitarian | PMP, 2xAWS, 4xMicrosoft, 3xJava, 2xSalesforce, Veeva, CISM and more.

6 个月

Thank you, President Ursula von der Leyen, for your comprehensive overview of the critical issues discussed at the European Council meeting. Your commitment to supporting Ukraine and enhancing Europe's defense capabilities is commendable. Cooperation and preparedness are indeed vital in navigating these challenging times. Looking forward to seeing positive progress on these fronts!! #EuropeanCouncil #Ukraine #Russia #Defense #Cooperation #Diplomacy #GlobalSecurity #EuropeanUnion #Leadership #InternationalRelations #Peacebuilding #Security #Unity #Progress

回复
James Musgrave

CEO & Founder MHI Ltd (Musgrave Health Informatics Ltd) Principal Partner Musgrave Consultancy

7 个月

Ursula Try as you may and posture as you do, the EU is not a homogeneous unitary super state, it is not and will likely never be a Europe version of the United States of America. Any logical evaluation of the EU's constraints model points to the role of facilitation and cooperation not integration and federation. You press for ever greater enlargement but the irony is that it results in ever greater pushback by Member States' National Govts against EC integration initiatives that are all designed to subjugate Member States Sovereignty to that of the EC and EU Parliament. A glaring example of that pushback is illustrated by the status of the Euro. A common currency usually requires fiscal unity but to achieve that outcome requires each Member State to give up sovereignty of their financial and tax system to the EC which, to date, no Member State will do. So, the reality is that ways round that have been found to make the Euro work - so far. Also, there is no such thing as an EU economy - the reality is that there are 27 sovereign and disparate economies that are members of the EU. It is a misrepresentation to state that the EU economy is the 2nd largest in the world.

回复
Marco Reggiani

Impiegato presso Lazio Service S.p.A.

7 个月

L'UE che già ha dimostrato d'èssere un fallimento in termini socio-politici, per i Suoi coinvolgimenti con l'estremo Occidente, stentando ancora l'aver riconosciuto il Titolo di super potenza economica e politica: in competizione con Stati Uniti "ormai in declino" e Atlantisti associati; la Federazione Russa e il Blocco orientale "BRICS" in espansione. Posto che sia ancora assoggettata all'Agenda "NWO", e del Patto NATO che continuamente in espansione ed attualmente, originario di sempre nuovi Conflitti Planetari in nome di un'apparente democrazia da esportare nell'EurAsia "un po' come le antiche Crociate", la designano essere campo di battaglia tra le maggiori più grandi Alleanze mai istituite. Un Europa appendice così, o se si preferisce, Colonia Anglo-Americana, non sarà mai competitiva in nulla. Nonostante ad Essa, ne appartengano le migliori Menti, Risorse e Territori, ma che sono ordinariamente lasciati contesi agli avvoltoi.

回复
Paolo Senes (he/him)

Ecologically concerned, Serial entrepreneur, Impact Investor, Climate NED&Advisor | MBA

8 个月

Happy Easter Ursula von der Leyen , time to stop supporting wars and embrace discourse and actions of peace and oppose genocides. I am starting to regret to be European, you know. Also we have more important thinkgs to take care of, such as climate change and poverty, things that cannot happen if we invest in war.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了