OpenAI, Sam Altman & Satya Nadella: Leadership at Glance
Sebastian D. P. Hidalgo
Founder & CEO ?? I help companies under 500 employees get more results out of their sales & marketing by re-positioning them in the market. ??? Podcast Host & Author
Note: This article is getting updated as the situation evolves.
You will probably agree with me when I say that, on Friday, we saw a terrible example of leadership at play: Unless the OpenAI Board was operating out of valid reasons the could not disclose, the firing of Sam Altman was almost universally received as a terrible, risky move.
However, the following two days is this modern day tech drama were even more interesting, for they brought afloat two roles models:
Let's tackle them one by one:
Sam Altman: Losing a Battle to Win the War
This is something OpenAI's board didn't see coming.
At 28 years old I might be young, but I've also seen my share of founders leader a company, pass away, get taken over or straight out getting fired: In all of these occasions, some people always left.
However, between Saturday and Sunday we saw something unprecedented that should make every CEO stand at attention: Upon Sam getting fired, not only did Greg Brockman quit – giving us a hint at the fact that, most likely, the Board wasn't acting in good faith – but most of OpenAI's staff rose up in a beautiful mutiny of red hearts that made me feel like I was staring at a sudden appearance of Northern Lights.
This is a prime example of company culture. And I'm not talking about the wishy-washy, kumbaya list of values most companies deploy as bait on their websites and onboarding material – I'm talking about real cultural unity. What we saw this weekend is not respect for the founder or appreciation for the boss, it was comradeship.
You see, all universally hailed companies, from IKEA to OpenAI, have something in common: A strong Vision and a deep Purpose, two factors that make the audience, from fans to prospects, feel like they are part of something. It also affects culture, for employees feel that their job is not just a set of daily operations they have to perform to extract money. Purpose and Vision make employees stick together like a community, and every community will defend itself when attacked.
The Board attacked the leader of that community, and the community stood up for him, backing him up, teaching us all as lesson in successful leadership:
All together, these factors made Sam and Greg leaders that lead by example. As a result, their teams follow them more than they follow the company's flag, the Boards whims, or a salary.
But they are not the only winners from this weekend.
Satya Nadella: Strategic Prowess x True Agility
Many tech companies claim the concept of agility. Agile mindset this, agile workflows that – in many cases it's just waterfall processes dressed up in a flat hierarchy suit and wearing a somewhat fun-culture lipstick.
Usually, the agility talk comes from startups or scale-ups: The players who claim, often correctly, that big corporations cannot move fast.
You see, when Microsoft acquired 49% of Open AI Satya Nadella knew that he wasn't acquiring just disruptive tech and a name but more importantly a vision and a clear-cut set of specific capabilities and skills.
It's not by chance that Satya acted after the staff uprising: Without Sam and Greg the company was losing its Vision, but without the Staff 微软 was about to lose the unique capabilities of OpenAI – the true value behind that 14 billion acquisition.
So, despite what everyone says about big corporations and high-profile CEOs, Satya moved with the speed of a startup founder and the strategic prowess of an executive with decades of skin in the game, retaining Sam and Greg within the Microsoft business ecosystem.
Putting them where they shine best: At the helm of something exceptional.
OpenAI: The Future
If you ask me, unless OpenAI plays their cards flawlessly, dark clouds loom on their horizon. With many of their prime, sought-after talent leaving and the two visionary drivers gone, Ilya Sutskever will be left with the daunting task of:
You might be tempted to argue that Microsoft and the board won't let OpenAI die, but the problem is that it doesn't depend on them: AI's apex predator is badly wounded and will need time to heal.
And, as it heals, hungrier players will try to take the throne, and I wouldn't be surprised if Sam Altman's new breakthrough, whenever it comes, will be leading the charge.
Update : Ilya Backtracks [Nov. 3, 17:20 CEST]
Ilya Sutskever came out on Twitter expressing regret for his actions.
This decision sheds an even worse light on OpenAI's board and their intentions, but it also raises questions about their priorities and affiliations: Ilya's tweet makes you feel like he was manipulated into acting with the board – if so, why? And by whom, precisely?
AI & NLP Leader | Forbes Tech Council Member | Founder & CEO of Elloe AI | Building the “Immune System” for Enterprise AI
1 年Sounds like an exciting weekend in the industry! Can't wait to read your take on it. ??
Mantacc - Flocked swab manufacturer
1 年It seems prudent to feel that it is similar to when scientists developing AI become overconfident and reliant on their own creations, leading them to make inhumane decisions. I feel he may have asked GPT whether they should stage a coup over this issue. It really seems like something an AI would do, making the decision to oust a founder in a completely dispassionate way. Ilya was too eager to become a new kind of human through AI, he had become a bit misled?by the AI's logical reasoning. But sometimes an AI's decisions lack proper philosophical guidance. Because things in the world are constantly changing, if you rely solely on fixed model outputs from information inputs, then you will become fickle and two-faced. The world is changing, but why some people's hearts never change? So to persist in something, you need philosophy or values to guide you, like "unite all who can be united" or "harmony without uniformity". AI needs value guidance, without it the best it can do is act as a tool. It can only leverage its advantage in instant information processing in an amoral battlefield, like playing esports or chess.
Fr. Bank of America | Sr Leader Strategy Ops FP&A M&A Finance Control Reporting Audit Analysis Business Development SCM Purchases PMO BI Project Manager | Economics | Board Member | Editor | Trainer Teacher & Jr. Learner
1 年Big winners?Really? Don't think so, why? There is no need to call it Artificial Intelligence AI when it's not, we should call a spade a spade and say Machine Learning ML, Big Data, that is the right way to call the tech. Because so it is named after the purpose, meaning and reach of the tech. Period (am I too... shy? ??, sorry the hype for these last 5 years reeeally deserves precision).Yes, I was soon follower. Second, why so serious? Information Systems are all the same: commands and data to be programmed and understood by humans. They are useful, a lot. Nature is far more powerful than ML. No doubt. News on this? Yes, welcome: https://www.businessinsider.com/ai-destroying-humanity-big-con-tech-existential-risks-2023-11?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=copy-link&utm_campaign=Insider_Today&utm_content=topbar Every time in History there's been persons selling things & fear to others. Please remember. Hopefully (a lot of) people keeps on aware age after age ?? from now on, as it has been for ages (and being savvy in this kind of issues is not easy, due to fake hypes, tell Copernicus!). Please let's keep on learning and being true to ourselves and keep on global (from round globe, yes) collaboration ??????. Go! Thanks, peace & best
Advisor Ai & Healthcare for Singapore Government| AI in healthcare | TedX Speaker #DrGPT
1 年CheckMate by Microsoft: https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/harveycastromd_microsoft-chessandleadership-longgamestrategy-activity-7132351258866192384-y68X