? Open Access in India – A Regulatory Comparison ?

? Open Access in India – A Regulatory Comparison ?


? Open Access in India – A Regulatory Comparison ?

As businesses explore Open Access (OA) solutions to optimize their power procurement, it’s crucial to understand how different states regulate OA frameworks. Here's a state-wise comparison of key Open Access policies across India:

?? Key Differences Across States:

? Capacity Limits: ?? Tamil Nadu – No restriction on OA capacity beyond contract demand. ?? Maharashtra – Limited to contract demand, subject to CT:PT ratio.

?? Karnataka – Open Access allowed only if contract demand is 1 MW or more.

?? Gujarat – Minimum 1 MW contract demand required; restrictions on multiple connections.

? Energy Accounting & Banking:

?? Tamil NaduTOD settlement, banked energy can be used within the same billing cycle.

?? MaharashtraMonthly settlement for banked energy.

?? KarnatakaBanking not allowed for third-party sale; only for captive users with annual settlement.

?? GujaratMonthly banking permitted, but limited withdrawal flexibility.

? Surplus Injection Compensation:

?? Tamil Nadu – Adjustments allowed between peak/off-peak hours.

?? Maharashtra – Power drawal permitted in TOD A, B & C.

?? Karnataka & Gujarat – No surplus compensation, excess injection is considered free power to DISCOMs.

? Banking Charges:

?? Tamil Nadu & Maharashtra8% of banked energy.

?? Karnataka11% of banked energy.

?? Gujarat2% of banked energy for solar, 10% for wind.

? Transmission & Wheeling Charges:

?? Tamil Nadu?5580.26/MW/day, 50% reduction.

?? Maharashtra?0.49/unit for Tx, ?0.60/unit for wheeling.

?? Karnataka – Charges based on voltage level; solar & wind projects get concessions.

?? GujaratTx & Wheeling charges waived for solar & wind under policy benefits.

? Cross-Subsidy & Additional Surcharge (ASC):

?? Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, GujaratExempted for Captive Users.

?? Karnataka & Gujarat – ASC applicable for third-party sale.

? Electricity Duty & Taxes:

?? Maharashtra10-year exemption for MEDA-registered captive projects.

?? Tamil Nadu?0.10/unit self-generation tax.

?? KarnatakaED waived for renewable projects for initial years.

?? Gujarat – No ED for captive & renewable users under incentives.

?? What This Means for Businesses: Industries planning captive solar, wind, or hybrid energy projects should assess state-specific OA regulations to maximize benefits. Tamil Nadu & Gujarat offer significant cost savings, while Maharashtra & Karnataka provide structured frameworks for industrial power consumers.

?? Which state do you think offers the best Open Access policy for industrial users? Share your thoughts in the comments! ??

Ranking States Based on Open Access Policy for Industrial Users

To determine the best Open Access (OA) policy for industrial users, let's evaluate states based on the following key factors:

1?? Flexibility in Capacity Limits

2?? Banking & Energy Settlement

3?? Wheeling & Transmission Charges

4?? Cross-Subsidy & Additional Surcharges

5?? Electricity Duty & Exemptions

?? Ranking of States for Open Access Industrial Users

1?? Gujarat – ? Best State for Open Access ?

? No electricity duty for captive & renewable users

? Low banking charges (2% for solar, 10% for wind)

? Wheeling & Transmission charges waived for renewables

? Strong policy framework & incentives ?? Drawback: Restrictions on multiple connections under OA

2?? Tamil Nadu – ?? Best for Large Industries & TOD Adjustments

? No restriction on OA capacity beyond contract demand

? TOD-based settlement for better energy optimization

? 50% reduction in transmission & wheeling charges ?? Drawback: ?0.10/unit self-generation tax

3?? Maharashtra – ?? Balanced Policy, Captive-Friendly

? 10-year electricity duty exemption for MEDA-registered projects

? Stable banking (8% of energy banked)

? Exemptions for Captive Users on CSS & ASC

?? Drawback: Higher transmission & wheeling charges

4?? Karnataka – ?? Good for Captive Users, but Limited Banking

? Exemptions for renewable captive users

? Competitive wheeling charges

?? Drawback: Banking is not allowed for third-party sale, and 11% banking charges

?? Final Verdict:

?? Gujarat leads with the most industry-friendly Open Access policy, thanks to low banking charges, waived transmission fees, and electricity duty exemptions. ?? Tamil Nadu ranks second, offering flexible capacity limits & TOD-based energy adjustment. ?? Maharashtra & Karnataka provide structured frameworks, but Maharashtra has better incentives for captive users.

?? Which state do you think is the best for Open Access energy procurement? Let’s discuss in the comments! ??

#OpenAccess #RenewableEnergy #SolarEnergy #EnergyRegulations #TamilNadu #Maharashtra #Karnataka #Gujarat #GreenEnergy #PowerSector #ElectricityRegulations #Sustainability #EnergyEfficiency#OpenAccess #RenewableEnergy #SolarEnergy #EnergyRegulations #TamilNadu #Maharashtra #Karnataka #Gujarat #GreenEnergy #PowerSector #ElectricityRegulations #Sustainability #EnergyEfficiency

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jahagirdar Sanjeev的更多文章