Online isn’t killing the American department store, they’re committing suicide
Once an icon of modern retail, American department stores now seem to be in terminal decline. The impact of the internet on shopping habits has been identified as the killer, but closer inspection reveals the culprit is somewhat closer to home.
American department stores are dying. Not a swift and painless death, but a lingering decay into irrelevance and oblivion. The numbers attest to their downward spiral: at their zenith in 1985, department stores took 14.5% of all US retail spend; last year that figure was 4.4%, and it’s still falling.
On the ground, death takes the tangible form of vacant shops in malls and cities. Once bustling landmarks teeming with shoppers have been replaced by empty, dispiriting voids. Last year Macy’s announced 100 stores, around 15% of its total estate, would close; by the middle of this year, 68 of them will be gone. Sears will end 2017 with around 60% fewer stores than it had back in 2011.
The popular diagnosis for this decline is the internet. Consumers, it is argued, have stopped or cut down their visits to department stores because they can more easily buy what they need online, often at a cheaper price. This mantra of ‘shifting shopping habits’ has now become a catch-all excuse for poor performance. For some, it has also resulted in fatalistic thinking: viewing the rise of online as an unstoppable, destructive tide that can neither be tamed nor harnessed for good.
There is no denying that online, which this year will account for around a tenth of all retail spend in the US, has been disruptive – but it is not the sole cause of the demise of American department stores. It is not even the primary reason.
To make a proper diagnosis, we spoke to over 2,700 shoppers who spent less money at department stores in 2016 than in the previous year.
Across almost every category, most of the spend department stores lost not diverted to online – it went to other physical shops. In fashion accessories, for example, 78% of the spend lost from department stores was diverted to other bricks-and-mortar fashion shops, most of them specialist brand stores and off-price outlets.
If this demonstrates that the impact of online is more muted than is often believed, it also suggests that the question as to why department stores are losing trade is not fully answered by simply pointing to the internet.
Consumers interviewed in the survey help reveal the underlying answer. The top three reasons for spending less at department stores in 2016 a lack of interesting products and services, uninspiring shops, and an unpleasant shopping experience. These are all factors fully within the control of department stores and are also the exact things that department stores have neglected over many years.
This lack of investment in products, store environments, and the general proposition is the real cause of the demise of the American department store and is the primary reason why they have become increasingly irrelevant to large swathes of shoppers.
The internet did not kill department stores. They simply chose to stop living and evolving.
Assistant Professor of KSU | Editorial Assistant @ Organization Development Network | Adult Learning and Leadership
2 年Thanks for saying it loud Neil, yes customer engagement is the key, and many organizations failed to keep customers happy. I've recently come across an article that mentioned Ulta Beauty and Sephora, working on their way up against the retail trend, and doing extremely well, increasing their number of stores and profitability, and customer engagement is the key. And to customer convenience, brick and mortar stores are coming back to the race with faster same-day delivery service, which is only possible from the nearby location. Combining both features, I think retail stores might thrive in the next few years, but again human interaction has its value, and salespeople need to be trained again.
Board Director | Chief Marketing/Growth/CX Officer | Strategy+Execution | P&L | Digital | Ecommerce | Retail | Brand | B2C & B2B | Enterprise & Startups | Mobile | FinTech | MarTech | AdTech
7 年Agree. https://www.verve.com/mobile-retail-future/
Principal, Aeon Project Development, LLC & Board Member at Homeland Innovators, LLC,
7 年I can buy that--at least partly. To cut costs, they went to really generic product lines. Sears lost its all-American flavor by off-shoring production even of its exquisite Craftsman Tools. They cut their offerings in Levis....I for one, ALWAYS bought my white Levis jeans there...but then Sears stopped carrying them! And no has the quality appliances that Sears has, but their stock of supporting products--especially household furniture, shrank to virtually nothing. Things that I always bought there, such a wallets, travel kits, sport jackets, Casio sport watches and the like, disappeared from their inventory.
National Sales/Account Manager | Business Development
7 年The boutique brick and mortar stores in my neighborhood are thriving. I think millennials are looking for unique purchases and mass retails are not willing to take that risk. They have always put their money behind the "popular vote"; risk aversion to protect the bottom line. Unfortunately , that is no longer the winning formula.