One Big Power Automated Flow vs Several Small Automated Flows

One Big Power Automated Flow vs Several Small Automated Flows

Sometimes in a project we end up maintaining, configuring or building several power automated flow and we start wondering which is the best approach to come up with big power automated flow or narrowing it down into some small power automated flows. So i would like to break down some pros and cons into both this methods when it comes on building and maintaining then.

Advantages of a big power automated flow:

  • Reduced complexity: Having a single, centralized system can simplify the architecture and reduce the number of components and systems that need to be managed.
  • Improved efficiency: A larger system can potentially handle more data and process it faster than multiple smaller systems.
  • Increased scalability: A big power automated flow can be designed to handle large amounts of data, making it more scalable and adaptable to changing needs.


Advantages of several small power automated flows:

  • Improved reliability: By distributing the load across multiple systems, the risk of a single point of failure is reduced.
  • Easier maintenance: Smaller systems are typically easier to maintain and update than large, complex systems.
  • More flexible: Smaller systems can be more easily adapted to specific tasks or requirements, allowing for greater customization and flexibility.

So we navigated through some of the advantages in this 2 approaches but how about the set backs of this methods?

A single, centralized big power automated flow can have several risks, including:

Single point of failure: A big power automated flow is vulnerable to catastrophic failure if any one component of the system fails. This can result in significant downtime and potential data loss.

Scalability limitations: If the system is not designed to handle high levels of traffic, it may become slow or unresponsive when faced with increased demand.(example Time Out errors.)

Complexity: A big power automated flow can be complex to set up and manage, requiring specialized expertise and resources.

Security risks: A centralized system can be a tempting target for cyberattacks and other security breaches. If the system is compromised, the attacker may have access to sensitive data and systems.

Cost: Implementing a big power automated flow can be expensive, both in terms of the cost of the hardware and software and the ongoing costs associated with maintenance and updates.

Rigidity: A big power automated flow can be difficult to modify or adapt to changing requirements, leading to inflexibility in the long term.

It's important to carefully consider these risks when deciding whether a big power automated flow is the right choice for a particular project or use case.

Debugging complexity: I believe this statement is self explanatory that debugging a big automated flow is very complex, time consuming and difficult to focus yourself on finding the issue.


Using several small Microsoft PowerApps Power Automated Flows can have several risks, including:

  1. Complexity: Having multiple Power Automated Flows can add complexity to the overall system architecture and make it more difficult to manage and troubleshoot.
  2. Integration challenges: It can be challenging to integrate multiple Power Automated Flows with other systems or tools, especially if they were not designed to work together.
  3. Increased maintenance: Having multiple Power Automated Flows can increase the maintenance workload, as each flow needs to be updated and maintained separately.
  4. Higher costs: Implementing multiple Power Automated Flows can be more expensive, as each flow requires its own resources and licenses.
  5. Inconsistent performance: If each Power Automated Flow is not configured identically, the performance of the overall system may be inconsistent, leading to delays or errors.
  6. Data consistency challenges: Having multiple Power Automated Flows can make it more challenging to ensure data consistency and integrity across the entire system.

One other major fact that needs to be considered is also the Power Automated Flows limitations itself based on the logic that you want to build. So is best to have a look also on : Power Automate Limitations

It's important to carefully consider these risks when deciding whether several small Microsoft PowerApps Power Automated Flows are the right choice for a particular project or use case.

Until next article.

Happy flowing!

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Arjol Rrodhe的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了