Omni a priori

Omni a priori means exists without beginning. Only eternal is omni a priori. Only eternal exists without beginning. Ultimately a priori means hypostasis. Hypostasis is the first object that exists with beginning. Superconsciousness is the one and only hypostasis, the first-first. Therefore, superconsciousness is the first instance of dualism, the beginning of dualism, which is necessarily non-physical dualism because nothing physical exists yet. Only omni a priori is not dualistic. In fact, omni a priori is a priori to everything physical.

?

Generic a priori means before something else. Generic a posteriori means after something else. Eternal, that which exists without beginning is necessarily before everything that does exist with beginning, which means eternal is before everything else without exception. Generic a priori and a posteriori both assume sequence and sequence occurs over some non-zero duration of time. Generic a priori and a posteriori both assume spatial location and temporal location. Therefore omni a priori and ultimate a priori are distinct categories of a priori, because neither is in any way limited to either spatial or temporal location. In fact, eternal and superconsciousness are a priori to both spatial and temporal location, because spatial and temporal location are both physical.

?

A priori and a posteriori are relationships between two or more objects that exist with beginning. The obvious exception is omni a priori because that is absolutely limited to eternal which exists without beginning. If object A exists before object B, then object A is a priori to object B. If object B is caused by object A, then object A is a priori to object B. If object B emerges from object A, then object A is a priori to object B. If object B is dependent upon object A, then object A is a priori to object B.

?

Numbers are the language of quantity. Quantity is physical but numbers are immaterial abstractions of physical quantity. Let’s say you have no knowledge of numbers, for instance numbers have not yet been invented. No one has imagined 0, 1, 2, 3…, yet. Nevertheless, if some object is important to you, say cowrie shells or children are important to you, then you will certainly know the difference between more and less physical quantity, which abstractions do not require numbers at all. In other words, you will know if you have more children than someone else in your tribe and that is a good thing for you.

?

Whatever the number 5 is, it tells you nothing about the intrinsic importance, nothing about intrinsic properties, functions and relations, of cowrie shells or children, or any other physical object.

?

All abstractions are immaterial category objects. Every instance of applying every kind of mathematics, without exception, is immaterial abstraction. Counting quantity, measuring size, speed, or location, calculating percentages or probabilities, rates of increase or decrease, etc., are all instances of mathematical abstraction. Only immaterial ego consciousness can do abstractions; no physical particles can do abstractions. Ego consciousness invents mathematics and ego consciousness applies mathematics. Ego consciousness did not create the first physical object in the first universe, but superconsciousness did.

?

Laws of physics are justified knowledge. Mathematical axioms are justified knowledge. Natural a priori axioms are justified knowledge. Laws of physics and natural a priori axioms are ultimately simultaneous, which means they exist at the same place at the same time everywhere all at once, but mathematical axioms only exist a posteriori, after, they are invented by human ego consciousness. Therefore, laws of physics and natural a priori axioms are senior instances of justified knowledge compared with mathematical axiom justified knowledge. ?

?

Mathematical axioms are totally dependent upon empirical observation and empirical observation is totally dependent upon physical category already exists. Empirical observation is impossible if there are no physical objects to observe and no ego consciousness to do the observing. No physical particles can observe anything. Physical is a priori to empirical observation and empirical observation is a priori to mathematical abstraction. You must empirically observe something before you can describe it mathematically.

?

Superconsciousness is a priori to laws of physics because laws of physics must be caused to begin; laws of physics cannot create themselves. Every physical object including laws of physics, including physical causality, must be caused to begin. Therefore, something immaterial (not physical) must exist that could cause the first physical thing in the first universe. However, even superconsciousness must be caused to begin.

?

It is necessary that something exists without beginning or nothing that must be caused to begin could possibly exist. Only eternal exists without beginning. Eternal is a priori to superconsciousness. Immaterial causality is necessary or physical causality could not begin to exist.

?

It is necessary there is a path from eternal to physical. There are three kinds of immaterial causality: 1) genesis-emanate, 2) genesis-create and 3) create-manifest immaterial causality. There are two kinds of physical causality: 1) mechanistic deterministic and 2) mechanistic non-deterministic uncertainty physical causality. All kinds of immaterial causality are a priori to all kinds of physical causality. All kinds of immaterial causality are intentional, and all kinds of physical causality are automatic.

?

Eternal genesis-emanates hypostasis superconsciousness. Superconsciousness genesis-creates everything that exists with beginning other than itself, certainly including the set of laws of physics including physical causality. Ego consciousness which emerges from superconsciousness creates-manifests physical reality by observing (looking) at now, decoding now and bestowing meaning upon it (including all abstractions including all mathematical abstractions). ?