Omicron’s Impact on January Jobs

Omicron’s Impact on January Jobs

Omicron’s impact on the labor market was evident in January while December saw home prices continue to rise.

January Job Creations Beat Expectations

No alt text provided for this image

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that there were 467,000 jobs created in January, which was much more than expectations of 150,000. In addition, there were positive revisions to the data for November and December adding 709,000 new jobs in those months combined, making last week’s report even stronger.

Note that there are two reports within the Jobs Report and there is a fundamental difference between them. The Business Survey is where the headline job number comes from and it's based predominately on modeling.

The Household Survey, where the Unemployment Rate comes from, is done by actual phone calls to 60,000 homes. The Household Survey also has a job loss or creation component, and it showed there were 1.2 million job creations, while the labor force increased by 1.39 million. The number of unemployed people increased by 194,000, causing the unemployment rate to increase slightly from 3.9% to 4%.

The U-6 all-in unemployment rate, which is more indicative of the true unemployment rate, improved from 7.3% to 7.1%, meaning it is almost back at the levels we saw in February 2020 before the pandemic began.

Average hourly earnings rose by 0.7% in January and are up 5.7% year over year, which is a full percentage point higher than the previous reading. Average weekly earnings were only up slightly on a monthly basis due to less hours being worked, which is likely due to Omicron’s impact. On an annual basis, they were up 4.2%.

Private Payrolls Drop in January

No alt text provided for this image

The ADP Employment report, which measures private sector payrolls, showed that there were 301,000 job?losses?in January – well below the 200,000 job gains that were expected. December’s figures were also revised slightly lower from 807,000 to 776,000 new jobs in that month.

Job losses were reported across all sizes of businesses, with the majority of those reported at small businesses. Small businesses (1-49 employees) lost 144,000 jobs, mid-sized businesses (50-499 employees) lost 59,000 jobs, and large businesses (500 or more employees) lost 98,000 jobs.

To understand the miss in this data, it’s important to look at how it’s collected. Over 14 million workers missed work at some time during January due to Omicron. If they were not working and not receiving paid sick leave during the sample week in which the data was collected, those workers were not counted as employed.

The sample week was the week that included January 12 and the peak of Omicron cases was January 11. And since most of the job losses came from small businesses, particularly those with 1-19 employees (-106,000 jobs), there is a good chance many of those businesses were not paying sick leave.

Initial and Continuing Jobless Claims Decline

No alt text provided for this image

The number of people filing for unemployment benefits for the first time fell by 23,000 in the latest week, with Initial Jobless Claims reported at 238,000.

Continuing Claims, which measure people who continue to receive benefits after their initial claim is filed, also fell 44,000 to 1.63 million.

After the recent rise in jobless claims, which was likely due to the rise in Omicron cases, claims are now falling once again as Omicron cases are slowing down.

There are now 2.067 million people in total receiving benefits, which is a decline from 2.14 million in the prior week and a stark contract to the 18.5 million people receiving benefits in the comparable week the previous year.

Claims are at very strong pre-pandemic levels, showing that the labor market remains tight.

Home Price Appreciation Reaches New High

CoreLogic released their Home Price Index report for December, showing that home prices rose by 1.3% from November and 18.5% year over year. This annual reading is an acceleration from 18% in November and is the highest reading in the 45-year history of the index.

Within the report, the hottest markets remained Phoenix (+30%), Las Vegas (+24%), and San Diego (+22%).

CoreLogic forecasts that home prices will remain flat in January and appreciate 3.5% in the year going forward. Yet, they remain conservative in their forecasting and continue to miss forecasts by a large margin.

For example, CoreLogic had forecasted prices would remain flat from November to December, and they actually rose 1.3%. And when we look to their report for December 2020, they forecasted that home prices would increase 2.5% annually – and yet they reported today that prices rose 18.5%.

Apartment List’s National Rent Report showed that rents also rose 0.2% in January and almost 18% year over year.?To put this in context, annual rent growth averaged just 2.3% in the pre-pandemic years from 2017-2019.?Over the last four months, rents are up about 1%. While the rise in rents is slowing, this could be due to some seasonal factors and it is possible that higher rent growth may return as more people move once the weather warms.

What to Look for From the Fed in the Months Ahead

The Fed’s actions remain crucial to monitor in the months to come, as they will play an important role in the direction of the markets and mortgage rates this year.

Note that the Fed has two levers they can pull for tightening the economy – hiking their benchmark Fed Funds Rate and reducing their balance sheet.?The Fed Funds Rate is the interest rate for overnight borrowing for banks and it is not the same as mortgage rates.

Hiking the Fed Funds Rate will actually be a good thing for mortgage rates, as the Fed curbs inflation and preserves the fixed return a longer data Bond provides. However, reducing their balance sheet (which means allowing Bonds to fall off their balance sheet and no longer reinvesting in them each month) would cause more supply on the market that has to be absorbed. This can cause mortgage rates to move higher.

Looking at past cycles, when the Fed began hiking the Fed Funds Rate in December 2015, mortgage rates moved lower. They waited a full year until the next hike, and during that time, inflation rose and mortgage rates moved higher. When they hiked again in December 2016, mortgage rates moved lower as inflation was put in check.

In October 2017, the Fed announced that they would start to allow their balance sheet to runoff and we saw mortgage rates move higher in response. When they began to slow the runoff in March 2019, mortgage rates moved lower and then really started to move down in July when the Fed ended the runoff altogether and started reinvesting in MBS and Treasuries.

Again, the point here is that mortgage rates like when the Fed hikes the Fed Funds Rate and hate when they reduce their balance sheet. We saw some of this dynamic last week when the Bank of England announced they were starting the runoff of their balance sheet, noting that?by the end of 2023 they will not just stop reinvestments, they will be outright sellers of Bonds. Global yields can impact our yields and Mortgage Bonds did not react favorably to the news when it was announced.

The bottom line is that we will want to closely watch how the Fed tries to walk the tightrope of hiking and allowing runoff during 2022.

Read more mortgage market news from MBS Highway:?https://blog.mbshighway.com/

要查看或添加评论,请登录

MBS Highway的更多文章