Older Adults Can Use Tech, But What Happens When the Tech is Ineffective?
The digital divide seems to be getting bigger and bigger. Worse, it has created so many worrying faults that it's starting to look like one of those disaster movies starring The Rock.
First, we have the digital economic divide. Then there is the digital racial divide. And, finally, The Plague has brought into renewed focus the digital age divide. While I could create a powerful Venn diagram of the three digital divides, as they all intersect on one plane or another, each is problematic on their own as well.
One of the issues in looking at the digital age divide is that for many, 70 is the new 50 and onwards. As the population ages, what constitutes old? Honestly, I used to think that 65 was ancient, and now that I’ve passed that age, I don’t see “elderly” anywhere in sight.
Many older adults (and here I’m talking 80+), have solid digital skills, if for no other reason than that it gives them access to their children and grandchildren. So, while they may not be able to create immersive digital experiences, they are adept at email, messaging, FaceTime and Facebook.
The truth is, of course, that even with non-smartphone capabilities, including basic text messaging, older adults can connect to their loved ones and critical services, and are no worse off than many in the developing world…with one key, and sadly, defining exception.
In the developing world, there is a focus on “work arounds,” or simple hacks that use “dumb” tech to solve problems. All of our admired (but often loathed) so-called Tech Giants (Facebook, Google etc.) have created solutions using SMS and basic phones, even as they continue to experiment with more sophisticated tech, launching balloons, drones and satellites to provide broadband—and to stir up FOMO amongst potential users.
In many developed countries, the age divide is less a symptomatic lack of wide broadband coverage, access to electric power sources or money for hardware, than it is a matter of, “I just don’t have the energy or intuitive knowledge to battle my way through screen after screen of crashing and contradictory user interface.”
The young use tricks of the digital trade, while the old spend hours waiting for spinning circles to still themselves.
While plenty of seniors have access to better tech, they simply don’t have the wherewithal or skillset to use it to its fullest. And by the way, this goes for public messaging and broadcasts as well. So many campaigns aren’t seen by the “old” demographic, as they are not utilizing the channels that purport to reach them.
The digital divide, then, as far as the oldest cohort of our audience is concerned, is more about UI, the simplicity of completion, than it is about lack of access to tech.
Bottom line, the people who need access to certain online platforms the most, say, websites to sign up for the COVID-19 vaccine, have the hardest time finding, navigating and engaging with the pathways that will get them there.
I don’t believe I’m overstating here when I say that it’s an issue that can have tragic consequences. Shame on us.
With all the money we invest in development and “disruption,” with all the time we devote to getting pizza delivered more quickly (my readers know my feelings on this), with all the brainpower we invest in providing yet another way for corporate teams to collaborate online (don’t get me started on this one), how is it that we haven’t provided a simple solution for those who desperately need the vaccine but cannot figure out how to get it?
We have become so jaded by our own tech skills and our ability to make everything more sophisticated (read: complex), that we have lost the drive to make the complex simple. And nothing, going forward, could be more important.
There are many huge systematic faults in the digital divide that will require retooling of much more than tech to fix. But the digital age divide can be bridged by purposeful thinking and empathetic ingenuity. It is not that older people are too senile or deficient to use digital resources and other tech, but rather, we, the younger folks, have failed to create a system that people of all ages can operate and navigate.
Listen to the amazing Frances McDormand (and if you haven’t seen Nomadland, do so right after you comment here):
“I think that ageism is a cultural illness; it’s not a personal illness”
And there you have it. Fix the culture, close the divide.
What do you think?
Exploring Next Passion-Path, Consultancy, Advisory, Lead, Project-Operational, Integration, Recovery-related Resource Opportunities.
3 年There was faulty wiring in the development of advanced technologies; which created a short circuit within the elderly. The older generations are absolutely capable of learning advanced tech devices and forms of communications. The proof of this lies in my own experiences with my 85 year old father while helping years ago purchase the right laptop, assist him in learning, aid him in adapting and configuring GPS and Bluetooth in newer model vehicles and even now guiding on the path to smart phones. What have digital adoptors and disruptors lost by excluding certain populations? Perhaps the sourced investor opportunities by not considering the aging populations who still have monies to invest. The question now remains will we be able to ensure safety and security while simultaneously convincing our aging elders of whom they can trust with their investments. We should have trusted them to adapt, perhaps they would have been more able to trust in technology One thing is for certain; our leaders need to pull this country together and put an end to the great dividers
Writer, Teacher, Creative Director, Advertising Consultant, Videographer
3 年Complicated is easy. Simplicity is hard. Just listen to tech people trying to explain something to a non-tech person.The more jargon they use, the more convoluted their reasoning, the more likely they don’t truly know what they’re talking about. Their job is to make their knowledge understandable and usable in explanation and execution. But for the most part they do neither, either because they just don’t want to, or more likely they don’t know how.
Lead Systems Engineer | Senior Systems Architect / Systems Design & Architecture | Technical Leadership | Project Management | Integration & Interoperability
4 年Older people can use information technology. I am sixty and work in the information technology field. New and complex is not always better. Simplifying complexity is our goal at work so people of all ages can understand how to use applications and products.
Wholesale Account Executive | Class I - VII Equipment Text or call @ 630.388.8191
4 年J
Writer | Entrepreneur | CCO & CMO | Age Activist
4 年Great piece, David Sable. But simplified tech tools for folks with virtually any challenge do exist. They simply have not received funding and marketing to older adults — in part because of the ageist perceptions of young marketers. Yes, as the wonderful Frances MCDormand (whose performance in Nomadland is heart-stunnning) says, "ageism is a cultural illness." It blinds or serves an excuse to corporations and governments alike. The need for investment in low- or no-cost connectivity for older adults worldwide -- and a massive effort at digital literacy -- is urgent. 1.6 billion people have no access to 3G or 4G at all. Women are 25% less likely than men in developing countries to have access. Upwards of 27% of older adults in the U.S. are without internet. The time has come for the public -- of all ages, everywhere -- to get affordable digital access for all.