The Old Tick and Flick Syndrome: Understanding and Combating Complacency in Workplace Safety
In workplace safety, the "tick and flick" syndrome refers to the superficial completion of safety tasks—such as inspections, meetings, and risk assessments—without genuine engagement. This complacency can significantly undermine the effectiveness of safety protocols and increase risks. But how does complacency arise, and what can be done to combat it?
The Psychological Roots of Complacency
Complacency often results from psychological patterns where routine tasks become so familiar that they are performed on autopilot. Key psychological principles include:
1. Familiarity and Routine: Repetitive tasks lead the brain to enter autopilot mode, reducing attention and awareness of potential hazards【19?source】【22?source】.
2. False Sense of Security: Long periods without incidents create a false sense of security, leading employees to believe that risks are minimal or non-existent, thus neglecting safety practices【19?source】【22?source】.
3. Lack of Accountability: Environments lacking consequences for subpar performance foster complacency. Without regular feedback and accountability, employees may not maintain high safety standards【22?source】.
When and Why Complacency is a Concern
Complacency is especially concerning in high-risk environments where mistakes can have severe consequences. Signs of complacency include:
- Shortcutting Safety Protocols: Employees and employers take shortcuts to save time, often ignoring critical safety steps.
- Increased Near Misses and Accidents: A rise in near misses or minor incidents indicates deeper complacency issues.
- Reduced Engagement in Safety Activities: Employees view safety meetings, audits, or risk assessments as formalities rather than essential activities【19?source】【21?source】.
The Role of Employers in Fostering Complacency
Employers can inadvertently contribute to workplace complacency through several actions or inactions:
1. Lack of Engagement and Communication: When employers do not actively engage with their employees or fail to communicate the importance of safety protocols, it can lead to a disconnect and a lack of seriousness towards safety measures【29?source】【30?source】.
2. Inadequate Training and Resources: If employees are not provided with sufficient training or the necessary resources to perform their tasks safely, they may cut corners or develop unsafe habits【30?source】【31?source】.
3. Failure to Enforce Accountability: Without holding employees accountable for safety practices, employers may inadvertently signal that safety is not a priority, leading to a culture of complacency【22?source】.
4. Overemphasis on Productivity Over Safety: When productivity is prioritised over safety, employees may feel pressured to complete tasks quickly at the expense of adhering to safety protocols【28?source】.
Positive Behaviours in Employees and Employers
Employees:
1. Active Participation: Engaging actively in safety meetings, inspections, and audits helps maintain high safety standards. Employees who are attentive and proactive in addressing potential hazards contribute to a safer work environment【29?source】【31?source】.
2. Continuous Learning: Embracing continuous improvement and seeking out training opportunities can prevent complacency. Employees should be encouraged to stay updated with the latest safety practices and regulations【28?source】.
Employers:
1. Leadership by Example: Leaders should model the behaviours they expect from their employees. Demonstrating a commitment to safety by following protocols and prioritising safety over productivity sets a positive example【22?source】【31?source】.
2. Regular Training and Engagement: Providing ongoing safety training and engaging employees in safety discussions can keep safety top-of-mind. Employers should create opportunities for employees to share their insights and participate in safety initiatives【30?source】【31?source】.
领英推荐
3. Creating a Culture of Accountability: Establishing clear expectations and holding everyone accountable for their safety responsibilities ensures that safety remains a priority. Regular feedback and performance reviews can reinforce the importance of adhering to safety protocols【22?source】.
The Impact of Communication and Body Language
Effective Communication:
- Positive Communication: Using clear, concise, and positive language when discussing safety can foster an environment where employees feel valued and understood. For example, instead of saying, “Don’t forget to wear your safety gear,” a more positive approach would be, “Remember to wear your safety gear to protect yourself.”
- Open Dialogue: Encouraging open discussions about safety concerns without fear of repercussion can help identify and address potential hazards before they become serious issues. Regular, informal and formal encouraged safety chats and forums where employees feel their voices are heard are crucial【20?source】【22?source】.
Body Language:
- Positive Body Language: Leaders should use open and approachable body language to encourage employees to share their safety concerns. This includes maintaining eye contact, nodding in agreement, and leaning slightly forward to show interest and attentiveness.
- Negative Body Language: Conversely, closed body language, such as crossing arms, avoiding eye contact, or displaying impatience, can discourage employees from speaking up about safety issues, thus fostering a culture of complacency【30?source】.
Change as a Control Against Complacency
Change can be an effective control against complacency. Implementing changes in how tasks are performed can engage employees by stimulating new neural patterns, keeping their minds active and focused. Here’s how change can help:
1. Switching Up Routines: Rotating job tasks and introducing new methods of performing tasks can prevent the slide into autopilot mode. This keeps employees thinking critically about their actions and maintains engagement【29?source】【30?source】.
2. Continuous Improvement (Kaizen): Adopting the Kaizen philosophy, which emphasises continuous, incremental improvements, empowers employees to suggest and implement changes. This keeps the workplace dynamic and employees engaged【28?source】.
3. Engagement Through Modern Techniques: Utilising modern technology and innovative information delivery methods, such as interactive training and regular safety reflections, can maintain high engagement levels. Tailoring safety systems to individual learning styles and communication preferences can also enhance engagement【28?source】【31?source】.
Conclusion
Complacency in workplace safety can be a silent threat with serious consequences. It can apply to any risk severity and increase the likelihood of an incident happening, even if the control plan was exceptional at the time of implementation. By understanding its psychological roots and implementing proactive strategies, organisations can maintain a culture that recognises the risks and uses that awareness to keep the workplace safety culture positive and relevant. Recognising signs of complacency, holding everyone accountable, fostering open communication, and continuously engaging employees through changes and modern techniques are crucial steps. Employers play a critical role in either fostering or combating complacency, and their commitment to managing it can significantly influence the overall safety culture.
To combat complacency in workplace safety, it's essential to keep practices real and relevant. Mixing up routines and actively engaging employees ensures everyone stays vigilant. Support the intent behind safety actions, understand their importance, and promote participation. If a safety action is required for reasons beyond workplace safety, such as compliance or addressing customer requirements, discuss and understand it thoroughly. Open communication can lead to solutions that address everyone's concerns. By fostering a culture where the entire team is watchful and engaged in safety actions, the "tick and flick" syndrome can be effectively mitigated, ensuring a safer and more conscientious workplace.
References:
- [OSHA.com: Complacency Kills: The Dangers of Complacency in the Workplace](https://www.osha.com/articles/complacency-kills-the-dangers-of-complacency-in-the-workplace)
- [SafetyCulture: Psychological Safety in the Workplace](https://www.safetyculture.com/topics/psychological-safety/)
- [TeamBuilding: Workplace Complacency: Definition, Causes & Solutions](https://www.teambuilding.com/blog/workplace-complacency)
- [MSC Direct: Worker Safety: How to Battle Complacency in Your Workplace](https://www.mscdirect.com/battle-complacency)
- [Stronghold Safety: Combating Employee Safety Complacency](https://www.strongholdsafety.com/combat-safety-complacency)
#CoMade #MakingPossible CoMade
Retired
3 周From the employee's perspective many of the implemented safety systems are seen to be ass- covering exercises which don't add any value to the work they are doing. Pre- work risk assessments such as STARs and STOPs are often completed at times when the work is not actually being done, however the requirement is actually the amount of assessments required to be submitted rather than the quality of the assessment, which are never actually read by anyone. Employees are like everyone else - they will always test a system, and when it is found to have no credibility, will react accordingly.