The Off-the-Shelf Fallacy in Lab Automation
Martin Winter
Laboratory Automation & Digital Solutions | Founder, Lab Automation Network | Chemist
Have you ever been surprised or wondered why an off-the-shelf vendor struggled with implementing a solution that required some adaptations to custom materials or protocols? Perhaps you expected a smooth process given their previous successes with similar systems, only to find yourself facing unexpected delays and complications. This scenario highlights what I call "the off-the-shelf fallacy"—the mistaken belief that a previously developed automation solution can seamlessly adapt to new, albeit similar, requirements. This fallacy can lead to significant setbacks and inefficiencies, especially in the case of more complex projects where customer-specific requirements are at stake.
Understanding the Fallacy
The off-the-shelf fallacy hinges on the assumption that a pre-existing solution will easily fit new applications with minimal adjustments. This assumption is flawed for several reasons:
The Value of Custom Solutions
Custom lab automation solutions, designed by vendors with deep engineering knowledge, offer several key advantages:
Criteria for Successful Custom Solutions
Beyond the basic advantages of custom solutions, there are two additional critical criteria that should be considered when evaluating lab automation vendors:
1. Expertise in Customized Engineering
Expertise in customized engineering is paramount. This includes the ability to conduct a reliable project workflow, delivering solutions on time and within budget while ensuring the fulfillment of customer-specific requirements. Vendors with this expertise bring several benefits:
领英推荐
2. Freedom of Choice in Instruments and Technologies
One of the significant benefits of custom solutions is the freedom to choose the instruments and technologies that are best suited for the customer's specific needs. This flexibility allows for several advantages:
Case in Point: The Impact of Complexity
Consider a lab that needs to automate a process involving proprietary cell cultures. An off-the-shelf solution might initially seem appealing, but the need to accommodate specific container formats, handling protocols, and disposal methods would necessitate extensive customization. Each modification introduces the risk of new points of failure and increases the complexity of the system.
On the other hand, a vendor specializing in custom solutions would approach the project with a deep understanding of the lab's unique requirements. They would design a system that offers the degrees of freedom needed to cover the desired range of cell types without unnecessary compromises. This tailored approach ensures that the solution is robust, reliable, and ready to handle the lab's complexities from day one.
Conclusion
While off-the-shelf solutions in lab automation can appear attractive due to their promise of quick deployment and cost savings, they often fall short when faced with the complexities of larger projects. The off-the-shelf fallacy overlooks the significant engineering efforts required to adapt these solutions to specific requirements, leading to potential inefficiencies and increased costs.
By choosing a vendor who understands the intricacies of the target application and can tailor a solution to fit specific needs, labs can achieve higher efficiency, better performance, and greater long-term value. In the ever-evolving field of lab automation, it's crucial to look beyond the immediate appeal of off-the-shelf solutions and consider the broader picture—where custom solutions often hold the key to true innovation and success.
IGNITING your Business with Business Spirit | Your TRANSFORMATION expert for Sustainable Market SUCCESS | Key Note Speaker and Author | Entrepreneur | Executive Coach and Mentor
3 个月Thank you for this wonderful article! Off-the-shelf solutions indeed promise cost effectiveness, however they never are able to cope with emerging complexity. A sound foundation plus agility to offer customized solutions are the future traits!
PhD Chemist | Process Development | Automation Enthusiast
4 个月Great perspective, Martin. For entire platforms or even self-driving labs, I am completely on your page. For individual modules those consist of, however, been as plain-vanilla off-the-shelf is crucial to ensure flexibility within the platform and independence from a single vendor. My impression is that vendors became more open in that sense recently. It‘s the same w/ computer-hardware or even parts: The combination of off-she-shelve parts enables customizing the hardware, the software layer leverages the versatility of the computer.
Key Account Manager Lab Automation, Nordics, and Eastern Europe hos Thermo Fisher Scientific
4 个月That is also exactly why I don’t believe “off the shelf” Lab automation even exists. You have to have modular solutions that are flexible enough to be customized. And don’t forget the crucial heart of your system: a very flexible and open platescheduling software, that is open and flexible enough to adapt precisely to your needs. And remember those needs Will change. It is a moving target. So if someone claims to have “off the shelf” lab automation. I’d be careful. The devil is always in the details. That means customized workflows.