Obstacles or Bottlenecks?

Obstacles or Bottlenecks?



The Wall Street Journal carried an article today on Eli Lilly’s success at bringing a new diet drug Mounjaro, to market. One feature among several, of their success: The company eliminated multiple committees that vetted decisions about drug development. There are two reasons why a committee system can slow down decisions. In the first, a?committee is simply not value adding. For example, it certifies decisions taken elsewhere but exists to publicly affirm them, for example to ensure that particular people and their constituents feel included rather than excluded.?The committee is performative rather than substantive in nature. The practice of reengineering identifies such non-value adding steps and proposes that they be eliminated. We can describe such unnecessary steps as obstacles, much like an unnecessary barrier on a highway that creates traffic jams.?


The second reason a committee can slow down a decision is that while it is essential it is under-resourced, for example the committee is poorly staffed resulting in multiple meetings, or members, feeling squeezed by other priorities, fail to show up, thus delaying discussion or votes. This is a bottleneck. Decisions?must flow through the committee, but the committee cannot operate at full capacity. This is like an unmanned toll booth. Drivers must pass through and pay the toll, but the toll collector is absent. (At least in the days before electronic toll collecting!)?We use bottleneck analysis as developed by Eli Goldratt to identify such rate limiting steps.?


One reasonable question is why obstacles and bottlenecks persist. One hypothesis is that both politics and psychology play a role. In the case of the obstacle, a committee might be just performative, but it is one way to keep the peace and protect the standing of key executives. It is a compromise formation.?In the case of the bottleneck, committee members are focused on their parts of the system, the domain of their own responsibilities, without considering their relationship to the whole, that is, the role they play in integrative decisions that cut across divisions and apartments. They are ambitious for themselves and their units, but not for the whole organization. So they don’t treat the committee with the seriousness it deserves. Both reasons suggest that in constructing a committee system that is requisite to the task we can't simply think of it as a challenge in social engineering– just putting executives in the right places at the right times– but also a human issue linked to standing, status, and ambition.?


Larry Hirschhorn Director, Dynamics of Consulting. www.dynamicsofconsulting.net

great little piece larry!!

回复

Thank you for sharing Larry. It's an interesting point and helps see how the desire to avoid conflicts (keep the peace) can stabilize an organization as much as prevent its ability for innovation. It's hard for the leading team to see this from within the system. It's again a reminder, that from within the system, the focus will easily be on achieving the objective to keep peace and individuals struggling to get themselves organized. The ability to stand back and look at the whole system enhances the ability to see and make grounded choices.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Larry Hirschhorn的更多文章

  • Know Thyself: Lessons from Bob Chapek's Tenure as Disney CEO

    Know Thyself: Lessons from Bob Chapek's Tenure as Disney CEO

    Leadership discussions often ignore one essential precondition for success: the age-old adage “know thyself.” Bob…

    5 条评论
  • Why Nike stumbled

    Why Nike stumbled

    Why Nike Stumbled. The Wall Street Journal reported recently that Nike’s digital strategy to sell more sneakers online…

    5 条评论
  • Open AI and the chaos of decision making

    Open AI and the chaos of decision making

    The recent turmoil at Open AI, the company that developed ChatGPT, poses many important questions about the dangers and…

    4 条评论
  • The vicissitudes of a calling: CNN and the firing of Chris Licht

    The vicissitudes of a calling: CNN and the firing of Chris Licht

    Chris Licht, the head of CNN, was fired summarily on June 7th. The proximate trigger for the firing? He sponsored a…

    1 条评论
  • What is organizational culture: The case of the CDC

    What is organizational culture: The case of the CDC

    What is organizational culture? I was drawn back to this perennial and always important question after reading some…

    3 条评论
  • Ernst and Young: The Mount Everest project and its failure.

    Ernst and Young: The Mount Everest project and its failure.

    On April 11, Ernst and Young, the consulting and audit firm, announced that it was shelving its plan to break off its…

    2 条评论
  • The overmanned setting

    The overmanned setting

    The Wall Street Journal reported a few days ago that some tech companies had overstaffed their roster of employees…

    1 条评论
  • Ambiguity or Uncertainty: The Fed and the fight against inflation

    Ambiguity or Uncertainty: The Fed and the fight against inflation

    The Federal Reserve Bank wants to tame inflation. It is doing this by increasing interest rates to reduce spending and…

    1 条评论
  • THE COLLAPSE OF SILICON VALLEY BANK

    THE COLLAPSE OF SILICON VALLEY BANK

    The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, SVB, highlights the role of psychodynamics in shaping business outcomes. SVB was…

  • TRENDS VERSUS INTENTIONS:MAKING PREDICTION

    TRENDS VERSUS INTENTIONS:MAKING PREDICTION

    One of the challenges an executive faces is making accurate assessments of the future. It is interesting in this…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了