Numbers Tell the Real Story—Here’s How
Risk management often begins with one persistent thought: “What if this happens?” That spark of imagination can fuel crucial conversations, but it's just the beginning. The real power lies in transforming these qualitative stories into data-driven decisions that drive actual results.
From Qualitative to Quantitative
Scenario-based risk quantification allows us to transform narrative-driven risk descriptions into measurable outcomes. Decision-makers can examine a range of potential results, for example:
The first version is a statement of concern. The second is a call to action. It empowers leaders to plan for specific outcomes, whether by bolstering financial reserves, investing in controls, or preparing contingency plans.
Monte Carlo Basics
Monte Carlo simulation powers scenario-based quantification by turning uncertainty into a range of possible outcomes. This involves assigning distributions to key parameters and running thousands of iterations. For each iteration, random values are sampled, the result being a range of possible outcomes, helping decision-makers prepare for both expected outcomes and extreme scenarios.
Overview of the Process
The process of transforming "what if?" into data driven decisions is straightforward:
领英推荐
Each step builds upon the last, making the entire process greater than the sum of its parts.
Why It Matters
A quantified scenario-based approach allows us to:
Consider Your Next Steps
Think about a significant risk your organisation faces. Could a scenario-based, probabilistic approach help you better understand and manage it? By transitioning from qualitative ratings to a data-driven approach, you’ll be better equipped to navigate uncertainty and seize opportunities.
By integrating scenario-based risk quantification into your risk management framework, you’re no longer reacting to the unpredictable—you’re taking control of it.
Want to try it out?
The Monte Carlo simulation app, hosted at riskspace.com, includes a variety of datasets for quantifying risks across numerous risk scenarios most with a focus on operational risk. You can explore these datasets using the "Select Dataset" button. A write-up on each scenario is available at riskinsights.com. Connect with me here on LinkedIn if you have a specific scenario you’d like to model or insights you'd like to discuss, I'd love to collaborate on your specific risk scenarios—please don’t hesitate to get in touch!
?
Principal Enterprise Architect
1 个月There is always the concern of effort and reward! How much effort and resource are required to deliiver something that has variable likelihood based on perspective, perception and practice. While data is helpful, there is considerable effort required to make data meaningful!
Senior Business Leader | Change Management | Risk, Regulatory, Finance | Board Advisor | Financial Services & Banking | Looking to support businesses to attain objectives in an interim, board and consultancy capacity
1 个月Good post and resources John.
That's fine: However, you should always start with a driver model. Continue to describe relationships (correlations) between the driver variables. After the simulation the prior belief is available. Collect data and derive the likelihood function (f.e. using kernel density estimation). Combine both data sources, prior belief and likelihood, to refine your model and assertions (posterior). This is called Bayesian learning. Do not stop at your prior beliefs. ????
Risk Advisor
1 个月John M. Good read! Risk & Reward. Risk and impact (if this happens- worst case scenario). Scenario analysis. Control effectiveness. Balanced controls: Loose controls, high impact. Many controls, kills business. Risk appetite (how much risk can we take / sustain). Quantitative (statistical) and Qualitative (non- statistical). Knowns, unknowns. Unknowns, unknowns. Black swan event.
I help Financial Services & SMEs turn Risk into Profit | Operational Risk & Resilience | GRC | AI & Cyber Risk | Founder of Arischio Consulting
1 个月Too many risk managers are scared of applying data to drive decisions, so they prefer heatmaps and fingers in the air