Numbers Tell the Real Story—Here’s How

Numbers Tell the Real Story—Here’s How

Risk management often begins with one persistent thought: “What if this happens?” That spark of imagination can fuel crucial conversations, but it's just the beginning. The real power lies in transforming these qualitative stories into data-driven decisions that drive actual results.

From Qualitative to Quantitative

Scenario-based risk quantification allows us to transform narrative-driven risk descriptions into measurable outcomes. Decision-makers can examine a range of potential results, for example:

  • Qualitative: “A product recall would be costly.”
  • Quantitative: “There’s a 15% chance a recall costs £2–£5 million, a 5% chance it exceeds £10 million, and a 1% chance it reaches £30 million.”

The first version is a statement of concern. The second is a call to action. It empowers leaders to plan for specific outcomes, whether by bolstering financial reserves, investing in controls, or preparing contingency plans.

Monte Carlo Basics

Monte Carlo simulation powers scenario-based quantification by turning uncertainty into a range of possible outcomes. This involves assigning distributions to key parameters and running thousands of iterations. For each iteration, random values are sampled, the result being a range of possible outcomes, helping decision-makers prepare for both expected outcomes and extreme scenarios.

Overview of the Process

The process of transforming "what if?" into data driven decisions is straightforward:

  1. Define Scenarios: Start by establishing a clear storyline that describes potential outcomes, along with their underlying conditions and triggers.
  2. Specify Parameters: Determine which factors, such as costs, duration, or volume, are most critical to your scenario.
  3. Perform Assessments: Evaluate the probability and outcome ranges for each parameter. Note that some parameters might require multiple assessments to capture different influencing factors. For example, duration may be affected by factors such as weather or equipment failure, each factor having its own likelihood and range of impact.
  4. Build Expressions: Develop formulae that link parameters to outcomes, the key to answering your ‘what if?’ questions.
  5. Run Monte Carlo Simulations: Generate thousands of possible outcomes by random sampling from the input distributions.

Each step builds upon the last, making the entire process greater than the sum of its parts.

Why It Matters

A quantified scenario-based approach allows us to:

  • Improve Decision-Making: Smarter, data-driven decisions arise from a clearer understanding of both expected outcomes and tail risks.
  • Prioritise Resources: Knowing where risks exceed our appetite enables smarter allocation of resources for mitigation.
  • Communicate Clearly: Quantitative insights, supported by visuals, make it easier to explain risks to others.

Consider Your Next Steps

Think about a significant risk your organisation faces. Could a scenario-based, probabilistic approach help you better understand and manage it? By transitioning from qualitative ratings to a data-driven approach, you’ll be better equipped to navigate uncertainty and seize opportunities.

By integrating scenario-based risk quantification into your risk management framework, you’re no longer reacting to the unpredictable—you’re taking control of it.

Want to try it out?

The Monte Carlo simulation app, hosted at riskspace.com, includes a variety of datasets for quantifying risks across numerous risk scenarios most with a focus on operational risk. You can explore these datasets using the "Select Dataset" button. A write-up on each scenario is available at riskinsights.com. Connect with me here on LinkedIn if you have a specific scenario you’d like to model or insights you'd like to discuss, I'd love to collaborate on your specific risk scenarios—please don’t hesitate to get in touch!

?

Joel-Ahmed M. Mondol

Principal Enterprise Architect

1 个月

There is always the concern of effort and reward! How much effort and resource are required to deliiver something that has variable likelihood based on perspective, perception and practice. While data is helpful, there is considerable effort required to make data meaningful!

Antony Craven

Senior Business Leader | Change Management | Risk, Regulatory, Finance | Board Advisor | Financial Services & Banking | Looking to support businesses to attain objectives in an interim, board and consultancy capacity

1 个月

Good post and resources John.

That's fine: However, you should always start with a driver model. Continue to describe relationships (correlations) between the driver variables. After the simulation the prior belief is available. Collect data and derive the likelihood function (f.e. using kernel density estimation). Combine both data sources, prior belief and likelihood, to refine your model and assertions (posterior). This is called Bayesian learning. Do not stop at your prior beliefs. ????

Kamran A.

Risk Advisor

1 个月

John M. Good read! Risk & Reward. Risk and impact (if this happens- worst case scenario). Scenario analysis. Control effectiveness. Balanced controls: Loose controls, high impact. Many controls, kills business. Risk appetite (how much risk can we take / sustain). Quantitative (statistical) and Qualitative (non- statistical). Knowns, unknowns. Unknowns, unknowns. Black swan event.

回复
Syed H Hussain

I help Financial Services & SMEs turn Risk into Profit | Operational Risk & Resilience | GRC | AI & Cyber Risk | Founder of Arischio Consulting

1 个月

Too many risk managers are scared of applying data to drive decisions, so they prefer heatmaps and fingers in the air

要查看或添加评论,请登录

John M.的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了