Number Theory in the English Department
Image by Henry Reich

Number Theory in the English Department

One thing, singular. Two or more things, plural.

Subjects must agree with verbs in number: It is, they are.

Of all the cows in the meadow, none are white. Or, none is white? “None” is zero things, neither singular nor plural.

I’m of two minds about that question. The half of me that goes with “none is” are coming out on top.

Because “half” isn’t singular nor plural either. Or aren't.

We could make a rule saying any number less than or equal to one is singular. But then, why does “none are” sound better than “none is”? I haven’t seen any rule like that in grammar books, but such a rule would settle whether a negative number is, or are, less than zero. A budget deficit is, or are?

(Then we have the pain-in-the-ass Brits, who speak a kind of English, but treat collective nouns as plural: “The cricket team are….” But wait, we civilized Americans do the opposite, singularizing nouns that clearly imply plurality: “A variety of candies is on display.” Ouch.)

Maybe we could invent a conjugation of the verb “to be” that is neither singular nor plural, but applies only to counts of less than one. How about “ib”? Then everyone would understand that “half a loaf ib better than none.”

We could use “ick” when the number is undetermined: “Albania’s economy, and possibly Montenegro’s, ick facing recession next year.” Darn those parentheticals and subordinate phrases!

These are thoughts spurred by editing ESL authors’ papers, and by watching the struggles of ESL students. I don’t want to be a grammar nazi, but what am I to make of a correct but mystifying sentence like, “Every student and teacher who attended the meeting was given an evaluation form"? (Darn that passive voice!)

Is one-and-a-half things plural? Or are it?

Fred Phillips

NGO leader, Retired prof, and Columnist

5 天前

My sister reminds me, 'There’s some debate about whether “y’all” can be used as a singular second-person pronoun (to refer to a single person, rather than a group), but linguists have already documented “y’all” being used that way. So, if “y’all” can refer to a single person OR a group of people, is there a need to pluralize it further? Some people say yes — and “all y’all” is the answer. So, while “y’all” may refer to an indeterminate number of people, “all a y’all”' refers to a group of people. But not to an indeterminate number of inanimate things. I used to be a Texan - those usages are so 2nd nature to me, I didn't think to comment on them. https://wordsmarts.com/yall-inclusive-pronouns/

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Fred Phillips的更多文章

  • What will become of reality?

    What will become of reality?

    For convenience, let’s say it started with Photoshop. That program made it obvious not only that we couldn’t believe…

    1 条评论
  • my most important column ever

    my most important column ever

    This column deals with political opposition, resistance, and the future of the nation. It dissects the Trump-Musk…

    4 条评论
  • Book Review: Lost in Austin - The Evolution of an American City. by Alex Hannaford. HarperCollins, 2024.

    Book Review: Lost in Austin - The Evolution of an American City. by Alex Hannaford. HarperCollins, 2024.

    The book is author Alex Hannaford’s lament about changes in Austin, Texas, since his initial visit to the city in 1999.…

  • The Notion of Nations

    The Notion of Nations

    Our outrage over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is due to our preference for democracy over autocracy, and to the danger…

  • Big Tech Whines About Antitrust

    Big Tech Whines About Antitrust

    Ooh, this is big, bigger than I imagined when I first noodled on writing about it. In short, tech industry opposes the…

    1 条评论
  • A.I. and Smart Cities

    A.I. and Smart Cities

    Our 2023 book, pictured, went to press just before Large Language Models hit the ground running – or hit the fan, if…

  • Crazy About Innovation

    Crazy About Innovation

    For hundreds of generations, life was unchanging. People lived just like their parents did.

    2 条评论
  • Someone shot Trump’s ear off.

    Someone shot Trump’s ear off.

    Someone shot Trump’s ear off. Alec Baldwin walked.

    2 条评论
  • Hit them in the wallet, or hit ‘em in the heart? Forestalling Fascism

    Hit them in the wallet, or hit ‘em in the heart? Forestalling Fascism

    To prevent, as we must, a Nazi-type regime in the United States, demands action on many fronts. As does preventing a…

  • AI is a sharp tool, let’s not cut ourselves.

    AI is a sharp tool, let’s not cut ourselves.

    Last week on LinkedIn, I ventured that when A.I.

    1 条评论