Is NPS right for you?

Is NPS right for you?

Does NPS make sense for you?

Let’s try this thought experiment: Say you’re a plastic surgeon, specializing in a bespoke and specific sort of work that’s...um, shall we say, personal in nature. Naturally, all plastic surgery is by definition personal, but I mean that your specialty is the sort of thing that people...just don’t talk about, whatever that may be. No, I’m not thinking of anything in particular myself. And yes, I’m sure this sort of thing exists. Based on this business model, what do you think the likelihood would be of any of your Customers discussing their procedures (and your work) with other people? Obviously, they’re unlikely to initiate such conversations themselves, but also based on the intimate nature of the need, I don’t imagine “friends and colleagues” of theirs—who might also have use for it—would ever raise the topic themselves either. Even if they’re extremely pleased with your work (and perhaps even more so if they are), your clients are not likely going to recommend your services to friends, family, co-workers, etc. Here’s an obvious place where NPS would make no sense as a metric for you.

There are lots of other examples, too. Products and services that seem germane to everyday life are potentially the sort of thing that will come up in conversation: the dog food we use, a movie you watched last week, the plumber I had come and fix my leaky pipe. Even if these sorts of conversations (about that plumber, for example) don’t come up all the time, it’s not hard to conceive in my mind the potential of recommending a product or service to someone were it to come up. But then, therein lies the rub.

Not to get all math-y on you here, but technically, the “likelihood to recommend” comes from a formula that I’ll sketch out as:

p(recommend) = p(promote) | p(conversation)

The first term on the right side of the equation is how likely someone is to like your service or product enough to suggest that others avail themselves of it. But the second part is the conditional part of the probability: the part that's contingent on the topic ever coming up in the first place (math nerds would read that as “the probability of promoting given that the conversation occurs”). The formulaic nub here being that, those two probabilities are multiplied together to produce an overall likelihood. Thus, as the chance of your Customer ever even having a conversation about you shrinks, so too does their chance of ever recommending you.

Does this matter? Do your Customers know what you’re getting at when you ask the question? Is the assumption that you actually mean “In the event it ever comes up, how likely are you to recommend...” understood to the recipient of your survey? I don’t know. But then again, why leave that up to chance? Why ask a question that has such an obvious shortcoming in the first place, thus adding potential but unnecessary flaws to your analysis?

As a statistician, I’d suggest to the plastic surgeon in our example that the probability of confusion or the Customer taking the question literally is enough to throw the results of the survey into question. As a CX advisor, I’d suggest that asking that question with such built-in ambiguity suggests an unseriousness about one’s interest in the Customers’ opinions in the first place.

This isn’t simply a rant against NPS. (Frankly, the word, “satisfied” is so meaningless and anodyne that using C-SAT is a pretty silly way to gauge the temperature of your Customers as well.) It’s a plea for you to take your interactions with your Customers seriously. If you are serious about your VoC program, you’re asking your Customer for incredibly valuable information: How you can improve what you do so as to attract more business (that of your current Customers as well as those who’d come after them). Realize the incredible treasure it would be to receive such insight and treat those providing it with respect. Ask actually actionable questions about their experiences with you and request honest (and brutal!) feedback about what you could have done better.

As thankful as you should be that the Customer chose you in the first place, a very close second in the list of things for which you should be grateful is their insights. If they’re willing to share them with you, don’t waste the opportunity by simply tossing out some boilerplate question so you can put the results on a PowerPoint slide. Do the upfront thinking work of formulating genuinely curious questions so you’re not wasting your Customers’ time and effort in helping you. Acting on that true curiosity will have the added benefit of providing more actionable insights for you as well.

 

(Originally Published 20210511)

– LtCol Nicholas Zeisler, CCXP, LSSBB, CSM

– Principal, Zeisler Consulting

Kendall Shortt

Bringing technicians the tools they want (and sometimes need)

3 年

Absolutely agree. It's hard enough receiving insightful feedback through surveys and even harder to have them give a rating that will help you make decisions. Know your end goal and ask the curious questions as you mentioned Nicholas. Then keep the conversation to keep winning that customer over and maximizing your time with them.

回复
Anita Toth

Hidden Revenue Hunter | Find $5K-$50k in overlooked revenues in just a few weeks--without chasing new customers | Champion for better customer experiences for everyone |

3 年

My fav line is this: "Do the upfront?thinking?work of formulating genuinely curious questions", which means you have an end goal for collecting the feedback in the first place. Asking for the sake of asking is pointless. Know what you're going to do with the feedback and then generate those 'curious questions'. And don't forget to close the loop and let customers know the results!

Tanuj Diwan

Top 25 Thought Leaders 2022 by ICMI | Co-founder SurveySensum | Working with Automotive, Financial, Telecom and other sectors to improve Customer Satisfaction

3 年

Love this ? Nicholas Zeisler NPS is a satisfaction metric not a recommendation metric. A Person can only recommend you when some sort of conversation comes up with another person. I have done that a lot with Zara, Hubspot without answering this NPS question from them But what I have noticed, NPS opens up a conversation between Brand and Customer. If they respond, give a suggestion and you follow up with them. It builds trust. And if you end up taking action on that request it enhances that relationship. So NPS for me is a relationship metric, a conversation starter.

Rick Denton

Conversation Catalyst | Amplify your event's impact | Live podcasting for results | CX Passport Live | Excite attendees | Reward high-value customers | Convert potential customers | ?????CX Passport Host??

3 年

Brilliant example in the article. (I won't be a spoiler and repeat it here...you have to go read this!) I'm still a fan of NPS in the right place and used, not as the metric to rule them all, but as one ingredient in understanding the customer's voice. However, as you point out, there are some clear examples where NPS should NOT be used. This points to how important it is to design customer listening posts (note I don't say surveys as that is only one of many possible listening posts) in a way to capture feedback that provides real insight and points to real actions one can take.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Nicholas ?? Zeisler的更多文章

  • What's your networking purpose?

    What's your networking purpose?

    Independent consultants have it sort of tough. Don’t cry for us; the liberties we enjoy make it pretty awesome as well.

    4 条评论
  • Figure it out

    Figure it out

    I wrote a while back about a pet-peeve of mine when I grocery shop: Not enough small carts. Now, that’s clearly a small…

    1 条评论
  • Okay, maybe AI will NOT kill CX

    Okay, maybe AI will NOT kill CX

    I wrote the other day about what I thought was a conclusion drawn about the impact of automation and AI and all that…

    3 条评论
  • AI Will Kill CX!

    AI Will Kill CX!

    One Big Question I hear a lot these days is about AI and automation. “How will AI impact CX?” How the heck should I…

    7 条评论
  • What's your word worth?

    What's your word worth?

    I recently had a particularly silly experience with the US Postal Service.* I mailed an envelope (containing nothing…

    3 条评论
  • I'm a greedy networker

    I'm a greedy networker

    I’m a selfish networker. But hear me out; I don’t mean it the way you probably think I do.

    3 条评论
  • Operationalize

    Operationalize

    I used to say that I don’t know anything about Marketing. Then I started spending a lot of time with marketers.

    3 条评论
  • Shu Ha Ri for CX?

    Shu Ha Ri for CX?

    Having spent a lot of time in education—corporately doing plenty of L&D work, having had lots of clients delivering…

    1 条评论
  • No, I don't want to log in

    No, I don't want to log in

    I recently had a ridiculous interaction with one of our household service providers. I had a general question about one…

    5 条评论
  • Getting CX Right: Copper Mountain Resort

    Getting CX Right: Copper Mountain Resort

    I posted about this way back when it happened, but I’m enjoying working from the mountains these past couple weeks, so…

    5 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了