Now, my articles are in Zenodo and Preprint.org

You might think that managing to post PUBLISHED work in preprint repositories is not something anyone should be bragging about...:)

By the way, I am still waiting for Paul Ginsparg to allow my work to be posted in the Los Alamos Archives. Paul Ginsparg won the Einstein prize not too long ago, I suppose, for doing what he does. I am waiting for an apology and a notice that I don't need to come up with another endorser just to be blocked again. Paul keeps a blacklist.

Maybe I should be gracious and just ask him to apologize to Mankind, you know, the people he harmed the most.

You would be right if the theory weren't disruptive, correcting the WHOLE PHYSICS and affecting potential grant money, book deals, pundit jobs...:) or Egos...

My theory is the Theory of Everything, and that is not allowed to come from a CIVILIAN. ;) I am not a member of the club. I am supposed to work there without any privileges.

THE PROBLEM WITH SCIENCE

Scientists just want my work so that they can plagiarize (check the "work" by Dr. Markolf Niemz and Siegfried Stein).

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202207.0399/v4

Copycat work that breaks the laws of Physics and scientific conduct. He mentioned my work (prior art) only in a few of the gazillion versions and never more. When he did, he mischaracterized it.

Just in case you don't know, Markolf tried to replace my Fundamental Dilator plus Dilaton Field with Electron + Oscillatory Electromagnetic Field. We all know about Particle-Wave Duality. Markolf decided to invent "wave-matter"....:)

The problem with that are many:

1. It is just a model for electrons
2. The addition of an oscillatory EM field is not consistent with the Quantum Mechanical model for Hydrogen. In other words, everything we know about hydrogen disproves (to use his words) this idea.
3. When asked: What is the Frequency and Amplitude? - You get no answer.
4. He proposed a logspiral (at 45 degrees) as the optical path of photons (ancient photons). Logspiral optical paths produce no redshift and hence it cannot be consistent with the Supernova Cosmology Observations.
5. He postulates a 4D space and a Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Hypersurface (LEHU). I told him that that is inconsistent with the Supernova data unless you also plagiarize my epoch-dependent Gravitation. In other words, one cannot just postulate my work and be fine. You have to plagiarize the whole work.
6. With respect to Wave-Matter...:) Markolf is a professor of Electronics. Any professor of Electronics knows that oscillating Electromagnetic fields are created by oscillating charges. For a single electron moving around, there are no extra oscillating charges, and there is no reason for the electron to oscillate by itself (Newton's First Law of Dynamics).

Of course, his slight to my work was totally wrong. I derived the laws of nature and showed that forces decay with r**(-2). THE DERIVATION IS SHOWN BELOW.

SIMPLE DERIVATION OF THE LAWS OF NATURE

This is a 4D plot of two interacting bodies or charges. The vertical distance is c times the Absolute Elapsed Time. For the calculation, one chooses to use R0/c.

The spatial reference frame is such that at Absolute Time (I derived the forces in the Absolute Reference Frame) -R0/c, the two bodies were connected by a vector R0_vec, going from body 1 to body 2. So, body 1 is the center of reference (0,0,0,0) in this calculation.

Body 2 is R0_vect. Body 1 will be at position 3 after R0/c, and position 3 will be given by (v1_vect*R0/c, R0/c). Body 2 will be at (R0_vec+v2_vec*R0/c).

At this point, you notice that we don't need to worry about the difference in time. The difference in space tells us everything.

I calculated both the Force exerted by body 2 on body 1 and the force exerted by body 1 on body 2 to make sure Newton's 3rd Law of Dynamics was still valid in this Absolute Reference Frame formulation. It is.

GENERAL FORMULATION OF LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION

Here, we introduced the Projector P or P(V). One is the unitary matrix. (1-P(V)) is the part of a vector that is not in the direction of V. Notice that only vectors along the velocity direction are affected by Lorentz Transformation (Relativity). Anything perpendicular to the direction of motion is not.

This is the most complicated step. Everything else is just simple Algebra.

We all know that Lorentz transformation is a rotation in 4D spacetime.

Galilean Covariance or Galilean Transformation between two inertial reference frames is just a translation (x -> x+a, t-t+b).

WHAT DID ALL SCIENTISTS MISS ABOUT LORENTZ TRANSFORMATION?

We all know that the Lorentz Rotation in Spacetime preserved the Electromagnetic Wave Equation. Once we realized that we forgot all about waves and focused just on space, Minkowski introduced the spacetime paradigm and the Minkowski Metric. Later, Einstein deformed the metric to fit whatever he wanted to fit.

That was a mistake. There was important information on the concept of waves. We know that whatever you do to spacetime, you are not changing the wave. In other words, the peaks of a cos(k.r) will always happen at k.r=n 2 pi.

In other words, whatever Lorentz Rotation does to spacetime, it must also do to k-vectors such that k.r remains constant. The derivation below showcases what happens in the k-space. Notice that the indices 0 are used for the Absolute Reference frame and 1 for an inertial reference frame with velocity V.

This shows that if you rotate the Absolute Vector r0 to achieve r1, the k1 vector will have to be rotated back to get k0 according to (58).

This is what was used in the AAA_Final_Derivation_of_Laws-3D_4_Body_1.iypynb, where I derived the laws of nature (force on body 1 by body 2).

Here you can see the rotations M1 and M2, the vectors V1, V2, R0_vect, the scalar R0, the speed of light c, and r1 and r2 ( r1 is really r14 in the drawing, and r2 is r23).

Notice the addition of an x*r_hat, where r_hat is the versor for the acceleration and force. Hat is used as a normalization symbol for the velocity, for R0. For all the other vectors hat means scaled by R0 (vector divided by R0). P1 and P2 are the "normalization factors" for r14 and r23.

r1_hat and r2_hat are just r1/R0 and R2/R0 (R0 is the scaling factor). Notice that r1 and r2 are vectors. In other words, the nomenclature can always be improved.

HOW THE K-VECTOR WERE ROTATED?

The k-vectors for the dilator field are trivial in the framework of the moving object. In other words, if you are a body in motion, the dilaton field you are creating will look spherically symmetric in your reference frame. I applied the Quantum Lagrangian Principle in the Absolute Reference Frame, so I need k1 and k2 projected into the Absolute Reference frame.

Equation (68) shows the simplicity of the k-vector in its moving reference frame. It will appear deformed in the Absolute Reference Frame.

Simple Definitions of the Dilaton Field and the Application of the Quantum Lagrangian Principle

About here, you can see that the calculation comprises the calculation of the derivatives of fields 1 and 2 to calculate x (or r).

Here, we calculate the derivative of Phi1

Here we calculate the derivative for Phi2

Here is the Latex version of the Electromagnetic Force. You can render it in QuickLatex.com. I did it in MathType and did the required manipulations there.

\frac{N P_{2 hat} m_{0} \left(- c^{2} + v_{1}^{2}\right)}{P_{2} \alpha \lambda_{1}^{3} \pi} \hat{r} \left(\left(\gamma_{v2} - 1\right) \hat{V}_2 \hat{V}_2 + One\right) \hat{r} \left(\frac{1}{2 P_{2} \alpha \lambda_{1} \pi} \left(- R_{0} \hat{R}_0 + \frac{R_{0} v_{1}}{c} \hat{V}_1\right) \left(\left(\gamma_{v2} - 1\right) \hat{V}_2 \hat{V}_2 + One\right) \left(- R_{0} \hat{R}_0 + \frac{R_{0} v_{1}}{c} \hat{V}_1\right)\right)^{-2} \left(\frac{8 R_{0}^{2} \pi^{2} v_{1}^{2}}{P_{1}^{2} c^{2} \lambda_{1}^{2}} \hat{V}_1 \left(\left(\gamma_{v1} - 1\right) \hat{V}_1 \hat{V}_1 + One\right) \hat{V}_1 \hat{r} \left(\left(\gamma_{v1} - 1\right) \hat{V}_1 \hat{V}_1 + One\right) \hat{r}\right)^{-1}        

THE FINAL RESULT:

This is an extra factor that multiplies the empirical laws of nature with which we are familiar.

So, the Gravitational Force came out as a LORENTZ FORCE?

How could that be possible?

That is just the result of symmetry and logical reasoning.

If one assigns the Absolute Reference Frame to the Sun, one can get a RADIAL law of gravitation, eliminating the dependence on v2 since v2=0.

HEY, CAN YOU SHOW THAT THIS IS CORRECT?

Of course, here are HU predictions of Planets Perihelion Precession Rates:

Where you can see where Einstein made his mistake (Mercury).

In other words, HU makes better predictions than GR.

Notice that the force calculated on a body 2 or 1 is the same (Newton's Third Law of Dynamics). That is possible because the forces are always expressed in the Absolute Reference Frame.

Repositories

https://github.com/ny2292000/CMB_HU

https://github.com/ny2292000/HU_GalaxyPackage

https://github.com/ny2292000/HU_Papers

Preprints ZENODO

https://zenodo.org/records/14047261 # HU-The Big Pop Cosmogenesis

https://zenodo.org/records/14047097 # The Kinetic Energy of Relativistic Particles

https://zenodo.org/records/14047049 # The Hypergeometrical Universe

Preprints Preprints.org

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202411.0689/v1 # The Hypergeometrical Universe

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202201.0106/v1 # HU-The Big Pop Cosmogenesis

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202411.0554/v1 # The Kinetic Energy of Relativistic Particles

Anyone is welcome to write a comment, critique, or praise my work at preprint.org or zenodo.org