Now: Additional BAF increases

Now: Additional BAF increases

Maersk appears to be the first container carrier to announce additional BAF increases triggered by the sharp increases in costs for low Sulphur fuel. They issued a customer advisory to this effect Tuesday. Their standard BAF is adjusted quarterly, but the sharp increases seen in the past month triggers an exceptional monthly revision. According to Maersk this will lead to increases of 50-200 USD/FFE in BAF from March.

It should be expected that other carriers follow suit in this endeavor, simply because from a cost perspective the spike to 700 USD/ton fuel cannot be absorbed without significant losses.

Or, another way to look at it, if the carriers cannot pass on this spike in cost to the shippers they will come out of Q1 with severely impaired financial results.

Consider a very high-level round ballpark number. The container carriers combined use around 4.5 million tons of fuel per month. The expectation was for a 200 USD/ton premium for low-Sulphur fuel. Instead this has spiked to a 300 USD/ton premium. The additional price premium beyond expectation thus equates to an added fuel cost for the carriers of 450 Million USD for one month.

Again in very round numbers, 14 million TEU is shipped per month. The added fuel cost therefore equals 32 USD/TEU or 64 USD/FFE as a global average. Clearly longer routes would mean a higher BAF and shorter routes a lower BAF.

chanoch winnykamien

Owner, www.shipper.co.il

5 年

I wonder if all of us noticed the shrinking gap between VLSFO price and HSFO a dramatic drop that would make carriers rethink about the surcharge update.?

回复
chanoch winnykamien

Owner, www.shipper.co.il

5 年

What bothers me is that portion of the fleet that is equipped with scrubbers hence fueled with the good old bunker. This portion should have been excluded from the calculation.?

回复
Jakob le Fevre

Managing Director @ MARPRO Group | Maritime Recruitment Expert

5 年

Hej Lars, godt indl?g. M? vi publicere det p? www.maritimeprofessionals.net med angivelse af dig som forfatter?

回复
Niels Bjorn Mortensen

Maritime Regulations - Owner at niels bjorn consult

5 年

When appreciating the marginal increase in the price the end-user will be paying for the merchandise in the shop, it's really baffling that shippers find it so hard to cover the additional costs being put upon shipowners/ship operators. I don't think end-users would refrain from buying a pair of Nike sneakers if the price increased from $150 - $151.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lars Jensen的更多文章

  • Shipping Cyber Incidents continued in 2019 and into 2020

    Shipping Cyber Incidents continued in 2019 and into 2020

    When I first got involved in maritime cyber security in 2014 with CyberKeel (now a part of Improsec) we approached a…

    4 条评论
  • Maersk & Hapag: Strong online uptake

    Maersk & Hapag: Strong online uptake

    Amongst the container lines, the two frontrunners on online digital container freight sales are Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd…

    8 条评论
  • Corona impact: 1.7 Million TEU and cashflow impact in Q2

    Corona impact: 1.7 Million TEU and cashflow impact in Q2

    Actual measurements of the demand impact on container trade still do not exist. All the data sources which measure this…

    1 条评论
  • Maersk: Scrubbers target 3M tons HFO

    Maersk: Scrubbers target 3M tons HFO

    In the investor conference call held by Maersk today (20 Feb) after release of their 2019 annual accounts, numbers on…

    5 条评论
  • Corona impact – here comes the rate increases

    Corona impact – here comes the rate increases

    The impact on container shipping keeps worsening. According to the latest SeaIntelligence Sunday Spotlight the carriers…

    5 条评论
  • Container shipping: Big problems due to Corona virus

    Container shipping: Big problems due to Corona virus

    The Sea-Intelligence Sunday Spotlight has just been published – 2 days earlier than usual in order to provide a timely…

    11 条评论
  • December drop in Eur and Nam container volumes

    December drop in Eur and Nam container volumes

    Container Trade Statistics has published the December data for global container shipments. North American imports…

  • Are you ready for IMO2021?

    Are you ready for IMO2021?

    As all are acutely aware, IMO2020 is upon us and 2019’s mad scramble to comply with the new low-Sulphur rules is coming…

    5 条评论
  • BAF: More increases to come

    BAF: More increases to come

    We are now 3 weeks into the new IMO2020 low-Sulphur regime, and two aspects are emerging for the container shipping…

  • How not to use the MRV CO2 emissions data

    How not to use the MRV CO2 emissions data

    The EU legislation mandating shipping lines to report CO2 emissions is in principle a good starting point for…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了