The Not-so-Surprising Truth About Teams

The HBR graphic titled "The Most Successful Teams Are Cognitively Diverse and Psychologically Safe" presents a matrix that categorizes teams based on two dimensions: cognitive diversity and psychological safety. Each quadrant of the matrix describes different behavioral characteristics that can define team dynamics, ranging from oppositional to generative and defensive to uniform. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for leaders and organizations aiming to foster effective teamwork and innovation.

Cognitive Diversity and Psychological Safety: Key Definitions Cognitive diversity refers to the range of different thinking styles, perspectives, and information processing methods present within a team. Psychological safety is the degree to which team members feel safe to express divergent opinions, challenge prevailing ideas, and take risks without fear of embarrassment or retribution.

The Quadrants Explained

1. Oppositional (High Cognitive Diversity, Low Psychological Safety): Teams in this quadrant are characterized by behaviors such as being cautious, controlling, flexible, hierarchical, reasoned, and resistant. However, the low level of psychological safety limits the team members from expressing dissenting opinions and challenging each other's ideas constructively, fostering an untrusted environment.

2. Generative (High Cognitive Diversity, High Psychological Safety): This quadrant represents the ideal team dynamics where members are curious, encouraging, experimental, forceful, inquiring, and nurturing. Teams here leverage their diverse perspectives in a supportive environment to innovate and experiment, driving breakthroughs and significant progress in their endeavors.

3. Defensive (Low Cognitive Diversity, Low Psychological Safety): Teams in the defensive quadrant tend to be cautious, conforming, controlling, directive, hierarchical, and resistant. The lack of psychological safety inhibits members from expressing unique ideas or challenging the status quo, which can stifle creativity and result in stagnant performance.

4. Uniform (Low Cognitive Diversity, High Psychological Safety): While these teams might operate in a psychologically safe environment, their low cognitive diversity means they may not generate many unique or innovative ideas. Characteristics such as being appreciative, considered, controlling, competitive, flexible, and hierarchical dominate, possibly leading to efficient execution within established frameworks but limited disruptive innovation.

Implications for Leaders and Organizations Understanding where a team falls within this matrix can help leaders identify strategies to enhance both cognitive diversity and psychological safety. For teams lacking diversity, introducing members with different backgrounds or training existing members to appreciate and leverage diverse viewpoints can be beneficial. Similarly, improving psychological safety involves cultivating an environment where team members feel valued and encouraged to share their thoughts freely.

In conclusion, the graphic emphasizes that the most successful teams strike a balance between cognitive diversity and psychological safety, fostering environments where innovative ideas can flourish through respectful challenge and collective problem-solving. Leaders who aim to maximize their team’s potential should strive to move towards the 'Generative' quadrant to harness the full spectrum of ideas and energies within their teams.

Check out our books on Amazon.

www.stevegladis.com