A NON-MONETARY POLICY, But Par For The Course
Tamal Bandyopadhyay
Consulting Editor, Business Standard & Senior Adviser, Jana Small Finance Bank. Linkedin Top Voice in 2015 & 2019
In May, when the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) went for an out-of-turn policy rate cut for the second time in a row, paring its policy repo rate to a historic low of 4 per cent, the equity market gave it a thumbs-down and bond prices rose marginally. On Thursday, the RBI refrained from a rate cut but the equity market cheered the policy; the bond prices dropped but there was no big selloff.
The reason behind the Monetary Policy Committee’s (MPC) consensus decision is the rise in inflation. For the same reason, the RBI governor’s statement doesn’t have any explicit foreword guidance on the next rate cut but none can complain. There is a structural shift in the central bank’s monetary policy – the focus is now on non-monetary measures.
The RBI is committed to “do whatever is necessary to revive the economy and preserve financial stability” but the next rate cut is off the table, for now. The retail inflation in June was 6.09 per cent, higher than the upper band of the RBI’s target. The MPC expects it to remain elevated till September before it starts easing in the second half of financial year 2021, aided by favourable base effects, but it has not committed to any figure. Ditto on growth, which is estimated to be negative.
The space for further monetary policy action will be created after inflation eases as the MPC doesn’t want to compromise on its medium-term inflation target (4 per cent with a 2 percentage-point band). The RBI’s rate-setting body will wait and watch “for a durable reduction in inflation” for action. For that, we may have to wait till February next year.
The no-rate-cut policy is a non-event for the bond market but for the economy and the banking system, it’s par for the course as the RBI has taken a series of non-monetary measures to support growth and keep the stressed financial sector stable. The most important of them is a Covid-19 window for one-time loan restructuring.
In June 2019, the RBI had framed norms for loan restructuring that made it mandatory for banks to treat restructured stressed loans as sub-standard unless there was a change in ownership of the borrowing company. Now, the banks can restructure loans for Covid-19 affected companies and treat them as a standard asset even if there is no change in ownership. Those stressed loan accounts, which had been in default for not more than 30 days as on 1 March 2020, could be covered under the new scheme.
An expert committee, headed by K V Kamath, who recently retired as chief of the New Development Bank of BRICS nations, will look into the finer aspects of the resolution plan under the scheme that will allow banks to stretch the repayment period by up to two years and convert part of the debt into equity, among others.
Not just corporate loans, banks are being allowed to restructure Covid-19 affected personal loans too under a separate framework. For the stressed loans given to micro, small and medium enterprises, there is already a restructuring platform in place. The RBI has extended it by three months – instead of December 2020, it will end in March 2021.
The announcement of the one-time forbearance package gives a signal that the six-month moratorium given to borrowers that ends in August will not be extended despite the clamour by many of them. While the RBI is extremely careful that the system doesn’t misuse the recast window, like the earlier schemes, the community of bankers should feel happy seeing Kamath heading the expert committee on restructuring and moratorium ending in August.
After the 115 basis points rate cut at two off-cycle meetings in March and May (beside a mid-April cut in the reverse repo rate by 25 basis points) this was the current MPC’s last policy meeting. By October, a new MPC could be in place. For the next rate cut, we will have to wait longer but by that time the government’s big, fat borrowing programme for the second half of the financial year will stare at the central bank. Going forward, we will have more non-monetary measures such as twists, open market operations, reshuffling of banks’ bond portfolio and even direct monetisation to see it through.
This column first appeared in Business Standard.
The writer, a consulting editor with Business Standard, is an author and senior adviser to Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd
Twitter: TamalBandyo
To read the writer’s previous columns, please log onto www.bankerstrust.in
Vice President- FX Product specialist- south , North & west - Institutional banking Group - CITI BANK NA EX - SCB
4 年Excellent read ! direct monetisation of deficit is widely suggested by economists but policy makers have been hesitant to deploy this tool however in my view the apex bank is already monetising the deficit through large scale OMOs which is practically the same as monetisation the difference is that OMO are a secondary market purchase instead of purchasing directly
-Consultant ---- printing & packaging M/S International Printing company Ltd, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
4 年Hi. Mr. Tamal B. I, Manas Kumar Bhadra, Ptg. & Packg. Consultant. Business Audit . Consultant. I am suggesting a scheme-- The first step should be to make a general survey and there after split them in Clustres with similar Size Turnover and Technological Know-how. Then we should exercise a SWOT Test , carefully Monitor the Quality of Management , current level of Capacity Those selected units will be sub-divided into Clusters with Main Goal of Capacity Utilizstion and the other necessary Actoons required to be undertaken by Each Unit under guidance of the Monitoring Body -- Represented by Experts , Bank Executive and one Rep from each of the Applicants/Unit. The entire cost of running this Monitoring Body +Experts Fees etc will be Shared by All Applicants .As soon as they reach a Level of achieving 60% of the Goal the involvement of this Experts . I sincerely believe , Such a scheme can be a great opportunity for the BandhanBank to expand their Business and also be in the Good Book withbothRBzi and Gov. Of India to achieve Upliftment of the MSMEs . We can discuss in details further . Looking forward to your valued response Best regards MANAS KUMAR BHASRA.. <[email protected].) Mo. 9830052970 .
Global Sanctions/AML(Advisor /CAMS/Corp.banking /Treasury Trainer and Consultant (ex. Std. Chartered/ABNAMRO/Royal Bk of Scotland )
4 年Right move on the part of the RBI under the circumstances. But the gross borrowing target for FY21 has been raised to Rs 12 Lakh Crore from the budgeted Rs 7.8 lakh crore, RBI will feel increasing pressure to partake in the government's borrowing programme or in other words in the monetisation of fiscal deficit. There is a possibility of inflation going up putting pressure on government bond yields which may impact banks too . All depends upon how Covid pandemic pans out in days to come. RBI has a job on hand.
Digital Transformation Solutions Consultant @ Cisco ?? Passionate about Science ??, Engineering ??, Technology ??, & Innovation ??
4 年Insightful article....RBI says they can't cut REPO due to Inflation targeting of 2-6 percent band limits...Current inflation is caused by supply side factors including artificial fuel price hike by hiking taxes...without significant demand, inflation is rising which is a cause of concern ...and government seems to be not concerned about reviving the macro economy as they can blame pandemic for the dip in economic growth...stagflation in offing ?