Nike's Olympic Ad Misses the Mark
Andreas Plastiras
Founder @ Way to Play - Sports Marketing Excellence | Ex-ATP Tour and Nielsen Sports | Insight and Intelligence to ensure you make the best Sports Marketing decisions
Nike recently launched its Olympics-themed 'winning isn't for everyone' ad and I feel somewhat troubled by its tone and message.
Between this and adidas’ ‘Hey Jude’ EUROS ad, where adidas focused their efforts on an individual players over the team, there is an evident consistency of emphasis on the individual athlete pursuit and the requirements for success in sports by leading sportswear brands and I think it is the wrong message.
For the purpose of this piece let's focus on Nike's spot, which hones in on the selfish and ego-driven inner voice. The Nike ad features a range of its star athletes to effectively leverage the idea that these selfish thoughts and ambitions are justified when the output is 'winning'. Reading between the lines it appears Nike's view of success and victory is in holding awards and recognition.
The ad contains powerful words:
"I have no empathy, I don't respect you, I'm never satisfied, I have an obsession with power"
I understand the message and I also understand that we all have a shadow side, an ego, a want to achieve at all costs, but it is a dated message and one that needs reforming.
It feels elitist, designed for few, and I can only assume that it is perhaps targeted at those seeking to become professional athletes? But then, why would Nike target this small pool of people? And does this fit within its brand ethos and 'Just do it' messaging from years gone by?
Is this the mindset we want people engaging in sports to adopt across all levels? Is it also not alienating to young girls? Research in the UK has previously highlighted that in schools that this ultra-competitive emphasis on sports has a negative affect on participation numbers in schools.
I won't dive too much further into this, it is just an ad after all.. But there is, to my mind at least, a somewhat concerning tonality to leading influential sportswear brands deviating from the true meaning and power of sport to unify people. Let’s think of it another way - does the personality / attitude Nike is conveying support us socially around the world’s biggest and most notable goals (climate etc?) I feel like these mega brands should be pursuing narratives of unity and what can be achieved together. On our world today we should all be striving to win - together. Perhaps that message doesn’t ‘sell’ as much yet?
领英推荐
At Way to Play we have literally built an ‘excellence framework’ - a set of modules to integrate the true meaning of sport in to messaging and storytelling within organisations and this totally contradicts it.
Within this context we pride ourselves on view such as:
"you're opponent is your greatest teacher"
"Team success trumps individual accolades"
These YouTube comments on the Nike video are pertinent. For most people, I'd suggest it captures it neatly:
"Winning isn’t for everyone but Nike needs to see a therapist"
"As a high school coach trying to teach good sportsmanship…thanks for making harder for me. All were signs of a champion accept lack of respect type comments. I get what they were trying to say, but they said it wrong in my opinion."
Perhaps this is the point all along. That it is targeted at the group of people who care about winning above all else. But again, I struggle to understand why Nike would go down this route - there are so many other directions they could have taken.
Music, Media + Tech: Advertising, TV, film and gaming Advisor - MyPart Inc. (music ai search, discovery)
7 个月However. Nike bringin’ the joy again, too ???? https://lnkd.in/ejqrbvu5
Senior Director of Brand & Creative | Marketing @ ATP Tour
7 个月This spot is fascinating and surprising in context of audience mindset. Bottom line, the ad sat uncomfortably with me because I was really surprised at the positioning and tone of the message. In 2024 this smacks the opposite tone to what we’ve been told we “should” be thinking. In the world we live in with the rising of new generational, open minded thinking - this feels really off the mark. Culture in sport (as a player) is huge and regardless of team or solo sports, the trend in recent years is accepting the ‘team effort’ around you, and shifting attitudes to be attune to the greater good of all parts coming together. The England team and Southgate is testament to this. It’s also pushing emotional thinking that has been criticised by championing the ‘stereotypical alpha, ‘red’ male’ attitudes, again that have been criticised in the past. Mindset here is a delicate battleground, I’m in favour of a lot of these attributes but on the balance it feels it’s gone too far. Sport is cyclical like everything in life, and this notion may come back, but we’re 10 years too early for this as the isolated ego driving boat has sailed. Even notice the red Nike swoosh, very intentional with an aggressive colour, but unneeded IMO.
Digital Director at Headland | Digital and social media strategy | Author of Only Third Party on Substack | Strategic comms planning
7 个月It's quite interesting how different those words from the ad you highlighted (I have no empathy etc.) read written down, vs Willem Dafoe's delivery in the ad. Cold and brutal written down, vs semi-serious trash talk in the ad. I think it's quite effective as a brand statement - and it speaks to a culture (as seen at the Euros) where individual performances often overshadow teams. But you're spot on that it has the potential to be extremely polarising.