Nike, Don't Do It
A few days ago, the share price of Nike fell 2.7 per cent in response to its controversial new ad campaign and purposeful step into the midst of a political storm.
On the 30th anniversary of the brand’s “Just Do It” campaign, Nike shifted from celebration to controversy when it plastered the words, “Believe in something. Even If it means sacrificing everything” across Colin Kaepernick’s face. Kaepernick is the quarterback who knelt during the US national anthem, which is played at the start of National Football League games. By defying the tradition of standing to give honor to the flag, he was protesting against US police brutality and racial injustice. He then sued team overs for allegedly colluding to keep him off the field.
Because of his decisions, Kaepernick has become one of the most polarizing players in America. His choice of when and how to stand in solidarity for a needed cause made him appear to be standing against patriotism. He’s ignited a fire storm between those in favor of preserving a tradition that is so entrenched in sporting identity, and those using sport for freedom of expression.
Kneeling during the national anthem is one of the least popular political stances a business could support, but Nike is entitled to its opinion. It is also entitled to actively support player protests and athletes’ freedom of expression on issues of great importance to the society. But, when they took sides and boldly supported Kaepernick by making him a poster child of their campaign, they made me wonder, am I showing my support for their view each time I put on my training shoes?
Nike doesn’t know this, but it’s been my partner in sports since fifth grade. For over forty years, it’s been my “go to” brand. Nike is the only brand of shoes that I run in, play basketball in, and wear on any other type of sports field, court, course. With its customization service, I’ve never felt closer to the brand. Being able to design the classics with the colors that I want has personalized a brand that I’ve literally hustled through life with. For thirty years, Nike’s tagline, Just Do It, was an emotive symbol of pride that for me, evoked memories of winning in the midst of fierce competition. Now, as the brand reaches its milestone anniversary, it’s redefining the meaning of one of the world’s most recognized slogans.
Nike’s history of sticking with players embroiled in controversy, even personal disgrace, is very different than promoting a player’s cause. Should a brand stand for an issue or cause? Yes, if they want to. In a free market every company should be able to make decisions about what they stand for and who they serve. And the customers also have a choice: do business with them or with somebody else.
Commercially speaking, research suggests that about a third of consumers will spend more money with a company that shares their values. Given that this is such a polarizing topic, will that one-third for Nike be with or against them? Fortunately for the iconic sports brand, most consumers are less engaged and therefore not inclined to change their behavior.
Even though consumers increasingly want businesses to express their views, I would caution brands against taking sides on controversial issues that are not built into their history. When you jump into a debate, you cause all of your consumers to choose if they want to be identified with your cause—and, in a world of options, they may just opt for your competitor.
I’m generally not an activist consumer, nor desirous for companies to wander into divisive social and political debates. Moreover, I don’t usually have a deep connection with brands. But for me, Nike is an exception. While I, too, am against racial injustice, attaching this stance to the deep and personal history I’ve had with Just Do It, makes me cringe. My advice? Nike: don’t do it.
Printed originally in Gulf News (10 September 18)
A thinker, speaker, and writer to the core, Dr. Tommy holds a doctorate in strategic leadership from Regent University, and is the founder of EMLC where he is the region's leading CEO Coach. In addition to writing a number of books—including the Amazon #1 best-seller, Leadership Dubai Style and 10 Tips for Leading in the Middle East, Dr. Tommy is the editor-in-chief of Emerging Markets Business—The Authoritative Review.
Follow me on twitter @tommyweir or visit www.tommyweir.com for more of my thoughts on leadership.
Workplace Culture Advisor, Author, Speaker, Coach, Trainer
6 年Update:
Workplace Culture Advisor, Author, Speaker, Coach, Trainer
6 年Update: https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1043611157037223936?s=21
Sales & Marketing Executive/Results Driven/Team Builder/Lifestyle/Branding/Experiential
6 年Their product is made mostly by underpaid foreign workers. The hypocrisy is stunning. But once again, perception wins the day and people really think they care about this cause. They simply are using it to sell more product.?
Programme Manager
6 年Maybe you should edit the start to this article : "...the share price of Nike fell 2.7 per cent in response to its controversial new ad campaign and purposeful step into the midst of a political storm, but today closed at an all time high for the company"
Managing Director at Ogilvy ┃ Board Member of the Lebanese Jordanian Business Forum
6 年Let's accept the argument that Nike did indeed decide to chose a side, racial injustice is a cause worth fighting for and investing your entire self against, patriotism on the other hand is debatable, some even consider it another form of racism. Are we not all children of this earth? What is patriotism in the context of humanity? Also, bending the knee is not disrespectful, it could be viewed as being overly respectful. You bend the knee in church. The TVC on the other hand is in my opinion the most demotivating message Nike could send. Don't aim to be the fastest running in your school, be the best ever?? How unreachable are these goals? How irresponsible is Nike to raise the bar this high? If they listen to Nike, our youngsters will never be satisfied with any of their achievements.. never happy. ?(these are my personal views and not those of my organization)